CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
When it comes to investing in real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly impact your purchasing experience and ownership journey. In this blog post, we take an in-depth look at Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP, a builder based in Gujarat, to help potential buyers navigate their decision-making process.
Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP operates in Gujarat and has encountered an overall legal landscape that consists of a few notable complaints. With one complaint recorded against them and a case won rate of 0, here is a detailed overview of the builder’s legal encounters.
The builder faced one legal case, which ultimately resulted in a loss for them. The details of the cases indicate a complexity surrounding the builder's interactions with customers. The single complaint was significant enough to highlight, as it brought forth legal scrutiny despite the case being later withdrawn by the complainant.
However, it is worth noting that there was a case that bore no definitive outcome against the builder, as it was withdrawn.
Upon analyzing the legal information available, it’s evident that Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP has lost one case due to the complaint being substantiated enough to require legal attention, although the specifics of the claims are not detailed in the records. The outcome signifies a legal tension that may be extrapolated to suggest possible areas where buyers should tread cautiously.
Conversely, Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP has experienced one case that did not result in a verdict against them, as the complaint was withdrawn. This does indicate that while the complaint may have been initially pursued, the lack of a resolution in favor of the builder signals possible negotiation or settlement outside of court, though the details remain ambiguous.
Considering the legal standing of Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP, potential buyers should be cautious. While the company operates in Gujarat and possesses some noteworthy real estate projects, the existing legal complaints, even if retracted, create a concern for due diligence.
If you're contemplating purchasing a property from Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP, consider the following:
In conclusion, while Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP has had notable projects, potential buyers should approach with caution and conduct comprehensive due diligence before making a purchase decision.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Pacifica Lakeside Developers LLP, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into common disputes, highlighting the builder's recurring challenges.
One of the predominant themes in these cases is related to Delayed Possession Claims. Many of the complaints seem to revolve around the builder's inability to deliver units to the buyers within the stipulated timelines. This is a common trigger for litigation in real estate, as buyers often face significant financial and emotional investments in their prospective properties.
Another theme that emerges from the cases is Non-compliance with Municipal Orders. The builder faced challenges that appear to be linked to a failure to adhere to regulatory requirements imposed by local authorities. This might encompass everything from zoning violations to inadequate project approvals, all of which are critical for a project’s legitimacy and continuation.
Disputes over Land Conversion or Classification also stand out as a significant theme in the builder's cases. It's clear that there were disagreements regarding the builder’s use of land, which could involve allegations of improper conversion from one type of zoning to another or disputes over the classification of projects. Such issues often stem from misunderstandings of the complex regulatory frameworks surrounding real estate or willful non-compliance with established rules.
Lastly, the builder experienced Penalties for Project Delays, which likely resulted from their inability to meet project timelines as discussed earlier. This could involve both governmental penalties for non-compliance with project schedules and civil lawsuits from buyers seeking reimbursement for delays.
The reasons people commonly brought cases against this builder include contesting what they perceived as arbitrary penalties, disputing project delays that they attributed to other parties, and disagreements over land classification that affected project delivery. A pattern emerges where the builder's failure to communicate effectively and meet contractual obligations created fertile ground for litigation.
The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases seem to revolve around insufficient evidence to support their claims, a lack of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and a failure to follow interim directions from authorities. This underscores the importance of diligent record-keeping, compliance with laws, and collaborative communication in the real estate industry.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!