SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS logo

SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the real estate sector, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. One such builder worth discussing is SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS, which operates primarily in the state of Gujarat. This article presents an analysis of the builder based on legal cases, complaints, and overall performance metrics, providing potential buyers with valuable insights.

Overview of SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS

  • Number of Complaints: 1
  • Cases Won: 0
  • Cases Lost: 1
  • States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Details

SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS faced a legal case where they were ultimately unsuccessful. The details of this case indicate some issues related to project completion and compliance with regulatory timelines.

  1. Case Summary: The builder claimed to have completed the project on time and obtained the necessary occupancy permit. However, they were penalized due to a delay related to the registration of the society, which led to a default in submitting the …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Penalties for Project Delays Disputes over Regulatory Compliance Delays Attributed to Other Parties

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Pramukh Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be categorized into three main topics: penalties for project delays, disputes over regulatory compliance, and delays attributed to other parties.

The first theme, penalties for project delays, is highlighted by the Authority imposing a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the builder for not submitting the final project report within the prescribed time limit. This indicates a pattern where the builder faced legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to project timelines and reporting requirements.

The second theme, disputes over regulatory compliance, is evident from the builder's defense, which claimed that the project was completed on time and obtained the necessary occupancy permit. However, the delay in registration of the society, which is a regulatory requirement for final project completion, reflects a common issue in these cases—non-compliance or incomplete …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review