SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS

Introduction

In the real estate sector, the reputation of a builder can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. One such builder worth discussing is SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS, which operates primarily in the state of Gujarat. This article presents an analysis of the builder based on legal cases, complaints, and overall performance metrics, providing potential buyers with valuable insights.

Overview of SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 0
• Cases Lost: 1
• States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Details

SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS faced a legal case where they were ultimately unsuccessful. The details of this case indicate some issues related to project completion and compliance with regulatory timelines.

1. Case Summary: The builder claimed to have completed the project on time and obtained the necessary occupancy permit. However, they were penalized due to a delay related to the registration of the society, which led to a default in submitting the final report. The authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the builder for their failure to adhere to the prescribed timelines.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

• Common Factors: The sole case the builder has lost illustrates issues with compliance and documentation. Delays in the registration process significantly impacted their ability to meet expected deadlines, leading to regulatory penalties. This suggests that buyers should be wary of potential administrative inefficiencies within the builder's operational processes.

Cases Won

• Common Factors: SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS claims to have won a case. However, further insights into this victory reveal that it revolved around project completion and occupancy permits. The response given by the builder did not disprove the delay in documentation, indicating that winning cases may not necessarily reflect exceptional practices.

Conclusion

In conclusion, SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS presents a mixed record in terms of legal performance. With just one official complaint and one lost case, potential buyers might find cause for concern, particularly regarding compliance and administrative processes. The absence of any successful outcomes in legal battles raises questions about the builder's operational reliability.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Do Your Homework: Research the builder's track record, paying attention to the number of complaints and legal disputes.
2. Verify Completion and Compliance: Ensure that all necessary documentation, such as completion certificates and occupancy permits, are in order.
3. Seek Feedback: Look for reviews or testimonials from previous buyers to gauge their experiences with the builder.
4. Inquire About Project Delays: Ask about any previous delays or issues faced in projects, which might indicate how future projects could be handled.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Licenses and Certifications: Ensure the builder is legally recognized and has the requisite licenses.
• Visit Past Projects: Whenever possible, check the quality of previous projects and construction practices.
• Consult Real Estate Professionals: Engaging with real estate agents or legal experts can provide additional insight and guidance in the selection process.

By considering these factors, potential buyers can make informed decisions when evaluating builders like SHREE PRAMUKH DEVELOPERS in their quest for a new home.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Pramukh Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be categorized into three main topics: penalties for project delays, disputes over regulatory compliance, and delays attributed to other parties.

The first theme, penalties for project delays, is highlighted by the Authority imposing a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the builder for not submitting the final project report within the prescribed time limit. This indicates a pattern where the builder faced legal repercussions due to insufficient adherence to project timelines and reporting requirements.

The second theme, disputes over regulatory compliance, is evident from the builder's defense, which claimed that the project was completed on time and obtained the necessary occupancy permit. However, the delay in registration of the society, which is a regulatory requirement for final project completion, reflects a common issue in these cases—non-compliance or incomplete compliance with legal or regulatory standards.

The third theme, delays attributed to other parties, is also crucial. In this case, the builder attributed the delay in submitting the final report to the delay in society registration, which was beyond their direct control. This shows a prevalent strategy among builders to contest penalties by disputing the causes of delays and often blaming other parties involved in the project, such as regulatory authorities or homeowners' societies.

Common reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of their obligations regarding project reporting and timelines. These patterns suggest systemic issues within the builder's operations that could impact their reliability and adherence to deadlines, ultimately influencing the decisions of potential buyers.