SHREE RAM CONSTRUCTION

Introduction

In the competitive real estate landscape, it's crucial for homebuyers to thoroughly research builders before making a purchase. One such builder that has made an impact in Gujarat is Shree Ram Construction. In this blog post, we will delve into Shree Ram Construction's legal history, analyze their performance in legal disputes, and offer guidance for potential buyers.

Legal Overview

Shree Ram Construction has faced a total of five complaints, with results reflecting a challenging path. They have lost one significant case while securing victories in four others, showcasing a mix of challenges and successes that prospective buyers should consider.

Cases Lost

• Case Summary: The sole case lost by Shree Ram Construction revolved around the provision of common amenities and the acquisition of necessary permits for a project. The complainant argued that these essentials were not fulfilled, highlighting a possible issue in project management or compliance with local regulations.
• …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Ram Construction, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily revolve around two main topics: amenities provision disputes and withdrawal and objection cases.

In terms of amenities provision, one significant case highlighted the issue of the builder failing to provide basic facilities such as a lift and water supply in their building. The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority ruled in favor of the complainants, directing the builder to install a lift facility and a submersible motor for the bore within 15 days. This case underscores a common expectation among homebuyers regarding the adequate provisioning of amenities in residential units.

The second theme pertains to withdrawal and objection cases, where three out of the four summarized cases ended where the complaints were withdrawn by the complainants. However, the builder's advocate objected in one case due to unpaid fees, which …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shree Ram Construction, which they won, revealed the following information.

The cases can be grouped under two common themes: Non-compliance with Permits and Barred Claims and Res Judicata.

1. Non-compliance with Permits: In one case, the complainant alleged that the builder did not provide common amenities and failed to obtain necessary permits for the project. This highlights how buyers' expectations about amenities and regulatory compliance are crucial factors driving complaints against builders.
2. Barred Claims and Res Judicata: The builder successfully argued that a previous complaint from the same complainant was barred by res judicata, meaning that the issue had already been settled in a prior legal proceeding. This emphasizes the legal principle that prevents parties from litigating the same issue multiple times, which is important for maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.

…

Unlock Full Report & Analysis