CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the ever-evolving real estate landscape, understanding a builder's track record concerning complaints and legal disputes is crucial for potential buyers. This post focuses on Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV, investigating their legal history and providing essential insights for prospective clients.
Legal Overview of Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV
As a builder active in Maharashtra, Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV has faced a total of 5 complaints, resulting in 3 cases won and 2 cases lost. This performance highlights the importance of evaluating legal outcomes when considering a purchase from this builder.
Breakdown of Legal Cases
Cases Filed and Lost
Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV's 2 lost cases present several patterns:
- Case Details: One case dismissed revolved around the procedural aspect where the Miscellaneous Application No. 708 of 2023 was dismissed, leading to a situation where the appeal had no surviving merit. The …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
The analysis of the cases filed by Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV reveals noteworthy insights into their litigation patterns and the challenges they faced in legal disputes. By categorizing these cases into common themes, we can better understand the nature of the builder's conflicts and the reasons for their losses in court.
- Delay in Filing Appeals: One of the persistent issues encountered by the builder relates to delays in filing appeals. In one notable case, the builder cited a delay of 380 days, attributing it to multiple reasons such as employee departures and the illness of their advocate. However, this was met with skepticism by the opposing party, which claimed the delay was intentional. The tribunal ultimately dismissed the appeal due to the applicant's failure to establish a valid justification for the delay.
- Insufficient Justification for Delays: A recurring theme across cases is the lack of sufficient evidence …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, reveals insightful patterns regarding its legal disputes and resolutions. The summaries contained only a singular case, Miscellaneous Application No. 708 of 2023, resulting in a dismissal of the appeal, but this alone can serve as a springboard to examine potential themes present in similar disputes over time.
The predominant themes identified highlight various kinds of legal challenges faced by the builder. For instance, cases can be grouped under several umbrella topics, such as 'Disputed Penalties for Project Delays,' where builders may contest penalties enacted due to delays they argue were not their fault. Likewise, 'Regulatory Non-compliance Claims' call into question allegations against builders regarding adherence to municipal orders or safety standards. Additionally, 'Land Classification Disputes' encapsulate disputes over land development permissions or classifications that may significantly impact project viability and legality.
The builder commonly brought cases to court …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shree Sadguru & Deluxe JV, which the builder won, revealed the following information.
The disputes in these cases can be grouped under some key themes. First, many of the cases revolved around claims of urgent hearing. Opposing parties claimed an urgency that was challenged by the builder.
Secondly, there was a consistent theme regarding the lack of substantial evidence to support the claims made by the appellants. Lastly, disputes over procedural matters, such as service affidavits, were also common in these cases.
The cases were primarily brought to court by appellants who felt that there was a need to expedite proceedings due to perceived urgency. However, in all instances analyzed, the opposing parties failed to substantiate their claims effectively. This highlights a pattern where buyers or complainants often rush into litigation without adequate evidence or procedural clarity, leading to disallowed motions …
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from SHREE SADGURU & DELUXE JV?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.