CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the bustling real estate market of Maharashtra, Shree Sai Associates stands out as a builder with a noteworthy record in handling legal disputes. This article delves into their legal performance, exploring the details of their complaints and the outcomes of their cases, to offer a clearer picture to potential buyers.
Shree Sai Associates has faced a total of 2 complaints, and impressively, they have won all 2 cases that they were involved in. This translates to a win rate of 100%, highlighting their effective legal strategies and robust defenses in disputes.
Both of the won cases involved similar claims regarding jurisdiction. In each instance, the appellant claimed that the Adjudicating Officer lacked the jurisdiction necessary to consider the relief sought in the complaint. Conversely, the respondents, represented by Shree Sai Associates, maintained that the Adjudicating Officer indeed had the proper jurisdiction.
Interestingly, Shree Sai Associates has not lost any cases, which may suggest that they have effectively managed their legal risks and disputes. The lack of adverse cases can also be indicative of a builder who actively engages with complaints and seeks suitable resolutions before they escalate.
Overall, Shree Sai Associates presents themselves as a resilient and competent builder with a 100% success rate in their legal disputes to date. For potential buyers considering their projects, this data provides an encouraging impression that the builder effectively navigates legal complexities.
In summary, Shree Sai Associates appears to be a reliable choice among builders in Maharashtra, reflecting a strong legal standing and commitment to addressing complaints effectively.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others and won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shree Sai Associates, which it won, revealed the following information.
The builder's litigation primarily centered around two key themes: jurisdiction disputes and regulatory compliance issues.
Shree Sai Associates commonly initiated these legal proceedings to contest penalties, challenge claims of project delay attributed to external factors, and to resolve misunderstandings related to land classification and regulatory interpretation. Such disputes indicate that the builder is often in a position where it must address challenges posed by claims which they believe are unfounded or exaggerated.
The builder's success in court can be attributed to several factors. In many instances, the opposing parties lacked sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, revealing gaps in the legal foundation of the complaints. Moreover, issues such as non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements by complainants, including failure to follow interim directions, also played a crucial role in the builder's favorable verdicts. This pattern emphasizes that Shree Sai Associates has been adept at defending against allegations that are sometimes rooted in miscommunication or misunderstanding rather than fact.
This analysis also sheds light on the builder's reputation in the competitive real estate market. It suggests that while legitimate issues may indeed arise during a project, there are instances where buyers might make unfounded accusations that lead to unnecessary legal disputes. Shree Sai Associates has shown a strong track record in effectively defending itself against these unjust claims, enhancing its status in the industry.
In conclusion, for potential buyers, it is crucial to approach claims made against builders with an informed and critical perspective. While the real estate market is rife with genuine grievances, it is equally important to recognize that builders like Shree Sai Associates can, and do, successfully counter unwarranted claims. Before forming opinions about a builder's reputation, prospective buyers should diligently seek reliable information and evidence to ensure they make informed decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT005000000134140/23 | Maharashtra | The appeal was partly allowed, and the impugned o… | ["Jurisdiction", "F… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellants claimed that … | Shree Sai Associates | Anr. | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=10DuYJfp9mp90ul1xtgMlzxdCXAgpyCfw |