SHREE SALASAR BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder for your home is crucial for ensuring a smooth purchasing experience. One builder that has recently garnered attention is Shree Salasar Builders & Developers, particularly in the state of Odisha. In this post, we'll delve into their track record, examining both the complaints lodged against them and their performance in legal battles.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases

Shree Salasar Builders & Developers has faced a total of 2 complaints, both resulting in legal cases that were lost. These outcomes reveal a challenging pattern and raise questions about the builder's reliability and engagement with their clients.

Details of Legal Cases

1. Case 1:
   • Appellant Claim: The complainant contended that the builder failed to complete the construction work and did not refund the corpus fund of Rs. 5,60,000.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the construction was completed before the applicable act took effect and provided a completion certificate dated 10.01.2017.
   • Verdict: The builder was directed to complete the construction, refund the corpus fund, and provide necessary documents to the association within two months.
2. Case 2:
   • Appellant Claim: The complainant alleged non-completion of construction, retention of the corpus fund, and failure to form a society of flat owners.
   • Respondent Claim: The builder did not appear in this case, offering no defense.
   • Verdict: The adjudicating officer awarded compensation of Rs. 20,00,000 to the complainant.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Lost Cases:

Both cases where Shree Salasar Builders & Developers lost showcased a common theme of incomplete construction work and disputes over financial transactions (i.e., corpus funds). The lack of a solid defense in the second case indicates a troubling absence of engagement or accountability from the builder's side. Their consistent failure to fulfill client obligations has resulted in significant financial penalties.

Won Cases:

Interestingly, while there were no cases won by the builder in the provided information, the details indicate that the builder had grounds to argue the completion certificate in the first case, yet they still lost the case due to a failure to meet obligations imposed by law. This suggests that even in cases where they had some legal footing, the underlying customer dissatisfaction and failure to deliver remained critical issues leading to unfavorable judgments.

Conclusion

Shree Salasar Builders & Developers has had a challenging history with legal disputes, highlighted by the loss of both cases brought against them. The patterns in these cases clearly indicate issues with project completion and financial disputes with clients.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Always conduct thorough research on a builder’s reputation, including reviewing past projects and client testimonials.
• Legal Clarity: Ensure all legal agreements detail construction timelines and financial agreements to protect against potential disputes.
• Engagement: Communicate openly with your builder throughout the construction process to ensure transparency and accountability.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder

• Reputation Check: Look into previous cases involving the builder and their resolutions. A strong track record can offer peace of mind.
• Project Visit: If possible, visit other projects completed by the builder to gauge construction quality and commitment.
• Client References: Ask for references from previous customers to understand their experiences firsthand.

In conclusion, exercising caution and conducting thorough research are essential steps for potential buyers considering Shree Salasar Builders & Developers or any other builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Salasar Builders & Developers, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's dealings and the common themes that emerged from these legal disputes.

The cases against the builder primarily revolved around three critical themes: incomplete construction claims, disputes over the refund of corpus funds, and the failure to form a society of homeowners. In each case, the complainants cited substantial grievances that highlight ongoing issues in the builder's operational practices.

The first type of case involved claims of incomplete construction work. Complainants often cited that the builder had failed to finish the promised development, leaving buyers in limbo and unable to receive possession of their properties. This theme was prevalent in two cases, where the builder was accused of halting construction prematurely and not returning the corpus fund, which is meant to cover the common areas and facilities in a housing project. The builder's defense in one case suggested that they believed the construction was completed before the relevant legislation came into effect, but this did not resonate with the adjudicating officer, who ruled in favor of the complainants.

The second theme revolved around the builder’s failure to refund the corpus fund, an amount that belongs to the buyers once construction is completed and the community is established. Since the builder did not complete the projects as promised, the buyers argued that this fund should be returned, and the legal rulings supported this position.

The final theme of failure to form a homeowners' society is critical because it reflects a broader issue of community governance and buyer rights. When a development is completed, it is essential that the buyers come together to form a legal entity that oversees their collective interests. The builder's failure to facilitate this step resulted in further legal action, as it undermines the ability of buyers to manage their own affairs and make decisions regarding their properties.

Common patterns emerged from these cases that shed light on the builder's practices and the complaints lodged against them. Buyers were primarily motivated to take legal action due to the incomplete status of their properties, the non-refund of their corpus funds, and the lack of community governance established by the builder. The builder's losses in these cases typically stemmed from their inability to provide adequate evidence of completed construction, their failure to comply with regulatory requirements regarding corpus funds, and a lack of engagement with the buyers regarding their rights and responsibilities.

Overall, these rulings highlight the need for prospective buyers to exercise caution when engaging with Shree Salasar Builders & Developers. It is essential to thoroughly vet a builder's reputation, operational history, and previous legal disputes before making a purchase decision. Buyers should also be proactive in understanding their rights and the expectations that should be set during the construction and sales process.