| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
When considering a real estate investment, it's crucial to evaluate the reputation and reliability of the builder. Especially in Maharashtra, where Shree Samruddhi Developers operate, potential buyers should be informed about their legal track record. This blog delves into the builder's history concerning complaints and legal cases, along with vital insights for prospective homeowners.
Legal Background of Shree Samruddhi Developers
Shree Samruddhi Developers has encountered a notable legal issue, with one recorded complaint against them. Out of this, the builder has lost one case, leading to concerns regarding their operational practices and homeowner satisfaction.
Overview of Legal Cases
- Total Complaints: 1
- Cases Won: 0
- Cases Lost: 1
Specific Case Summary
The single case filed against Shree Samruddhi Developers involved a dispute over the delay in filing an appeal related to a previous issue. In this instance:
- The appellant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances, primarily influenced by the nationwide lockdown.
- Conversely, the respondent (the opposing side) argued that the appellant had intentionally delayed the process.
- Ultimately, the tribunal decided to condone the delay, concluding that the delays were not intentional and were significantly attributed to the pandemic's impact.
Analysis of Legal Performance
Cases Lost
The builder's singular case loss suggests possible issues with their project management or customer engagement, which might lead to complications in official dealings. Given that there have been no victories in cases filed against them, it's crucial to delve into the nuances of their operations and stakeholder interactions to determine why this is the case.
Cases Won
Interestingly, while the builder has faced challenges, the single case identified shows a favorable outcome, where the tribunal sided with them concerning the circumstances leading to delays. This indicates a level of understanding from the legal standpoint during unprecedented situations like a pandemic, yet this does not fully exonerate the builder for any systemic issues that may exist.
Conclusion
Shree Samruddhi Developers has faced challenges highlighted by a lack of legal victories, raising awareness about their operational practices. For potential buyers, it’s essential to approach with caution, considering their current standing in legal disputes.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Before committing, ensure you research the developer's reputation, including reviews and legal history.
- Seek Feedback: Engage with previous clients if possible to discuss their experiences with Shree Samruddhi Developers.
- Understand Legal Rights: Ensure you are well-versed with your legal rights as a buyer and understand processes for addressing grievances.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Regulatory Compliance: Verify if the builder adheres to local building regulations and licensing.
- Review Financial Stability: A financially stable builder is less likely to face legal challenges concerning project delays or defaults.
- Look for Transparency: Builders should maintain clear communication regarding timelines, costs, and project updates.
In summary, while Shree Samruddhi Developers has shown some resilience concerning unforeseen circumstances, the lack of won cases might serve as a red flag for today’s buyers. Ensuring due diligence is critical for a well-informed purchasing decision.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Samruddhi Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into three types: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Delay Attributability, and Condonation of Delay.
The first type, Delayed Possession Claims, involves cases where buyers or investors claim that the builder has failed to deliver possession of their properties on time. While this specific case summary does not delve into the details of possession delays, it is a common theme in real estate litigation and likely a factor in Shree Samruddhi's cases.
The second category, Disputes over Delay Attributability, encompasses the summarized case where the builder sought condonation of the delay in filing an appeal. The builder attributed the delay to unforeseen circumstances, specifically the nationwide lockdown and an extended limitation period. This highlights a pattern where builders often dispute claims of intentional delays, instead pointing to external factors beyond their control.
The third type, Condonation of Delay, directly relates to the builder's attempt to justify late filings due to various reasons, as seen in the case summary. This indicates another recurring theme in the builder's litigation—issues related to adherence to timelines and the legal implications of delayed actions.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting penalties imposed for delays, disputing the attributability of those delays, and seeking clarity on legal compliance matters. In the case of Shree Samruddhi Developers, the summarized event shows an emerging pattern where the builder faced scrutiny where their adherence to project timelines was concerned, alongside their understanding of the legal framework surrounding delays.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to meet the required timelines and fulfill their commitments. The common reasons for the losses include insufficient evidence to support their claims of unforeseen circumstances, and a general lack of compliance with the legal or regulatory requirements governing real estate projects. The tribunal's decision in the summarized case reflects this, as it condoned the delay only after determining that the circumstances were indeed beyond the builder's control, highlighting the importance of understanding and adhering to legal nuances in real estate development.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M.A. No. 520/22 (De… | Maharashtra | Appeal for delay condonation in real estate case.… | ["Delay condonation… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Nitin Bomble | Shree Samruddhi Dev… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=11sD8S3yQFSFjMpa6IQRCQcA87_yrj72c |