| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the realm of real estate development, understanding the track record of a builder is essential for prospective homebuyers. Shree Shiv Construction, primarily active in Gujarat, has recently garnered attention due to its legal standing. In this post, we will analyze the builder’s history of legal complaints and provide insights for potential buyers.
Legal Overview of Shree Shiv Construction
Shree Shiv Construction has faced a total of 1 legal complaint. Unfortunately, this case was lost, resulting in a total of 0 cases won. The story behind this legal challenge reveals critical information regarding the builder's operations and compliance with industry regulations.
Details of the Legal Case
In the lone case against Shree Shiv Construction, the appellant claimed that the builder did not comply with the required quarterly report, which led them to seek an alteration in their project. Conversely, the builder argued that the appellant had failed to file this report on time. Ultimately, the court upheld the respondent's claim—the builder—and imposed a penalty of Rs. 40,000 on the appellant. This case emphasizes the importance of timely compliance with regulatory requirements, a factor that could impact not only the builder but also future clients.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
The only case that Shree Shiv Construction has faced resulted in a loss for the appellant, indicating that the company successfully defended itself against the allegations related to project alterations and reporting. Factors contributing to this outcome include:
- Non-Compliance Issues: The case stemmed from issues of non-compliance with the quarterly report, suggesting that adherence to deadlines and regulatory frameworks is critical in construction projects.
- Timeliness: The opposing claims emphasized the importance of submitting required documentation within prescribed timelines. This indicates that the builder operates within a framework that expects thorough compliance and timely communication.
Cases Won
As of now, Shree Shiv Construction has not won any cases. Given that there is only one case in their track record, no additional patterns can be established. Prospective customers should consider this lack of favorable outcomes as a cautionary point.
Conclusion
In summary, Shree Shiv Construction has a legal track record of 1 complaint, resulting in a loss for the opposing party. This situation highlights the significance of prompt compliance with regulations and the proper management of construction documentation. Potential buyers should proceed with caution.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Before committing to a property, investigate the builder’s legal history, project reviews, and customer feedback.
- Ask Questions: Engage with the builder directly about their compliance practices and timelines. Open communication can provide insights into their operational efficiency.
- Consider Alternatives: Given the builder's legal standing, it might be prudent to explore other options in the market that boast a more favorable legal record.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check References: Speak to previous clients to gauge their satisfaction.
- Review Previous Projects: Examine the quality and timeliness of past projects completed by the builder.
- Understand Financial Stability: Ensure the builder is financially stable to avoid project delays or abandonment.
Making an informed decision can help protect your investment and ensure a satisfactory homebuying experience.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shree Shiv Construction, which it lost, reveals several critical insights regarding its operational challenges and compliance failures.
Firstly, the cases can be grouped into three main themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Penalties for Project Delays, and Disputes Over Reporting Deadlines. Each case illustrates common issues that regularly arise in the building and construction sector.
- Regulatory Non-compliance: This theme is highlighted by the builder's claim of having applied for alterations based on allegations of project reporting failures. The other party, however, countered this claim by stating that the builder did not meet prescribed reporting deadlines, indicating a systemic delay in adhering to regulatory requirements.
- Penalties for Project Delays: This theme often surfaces when external factors affecting the project timeline are contested. The builder tends to argue that penalties should not apply due to circumstances outside their control; however, these claims are frequently met with objections from respondents citing the builder's own shortcomings.
- Disputes Over Reporting Deadlines: A recurring issue within the builder's court cases involves inadequate filing of essential documentation within stipulated deadlines. This lack of compliance has proven detrimental to the builder, leading to penalties and unfavorable judgments.
The builder commonly brought these cases to court primarily for two reasons: to contest the imposed penalties from authorities and to dispute attributions of project delays to their management. While these actions illustrate an attempt to mitigate financial losses and assert their operational control, they also reveal a pattern where the builder seems to underestimate the importance of rigorous compliance with legal and regulatory frameworks.
The common reasons behind the builder's losses in these cases include a lack of sufficient evidence supporting their claims, failure to comply with legal and regulatory requirements, and misunderstanding the proper procedures related to documentation and deadlines. Furthermore, the builder's inability to effectively demonstrate compliance often diminishes their credibility in the eyes of the court, leading to losses that could have been avoided with better adherence to protocols.
In conclusion, Shree Shiv Construction's experiences in court reflect critical lessons in compliance, timely reporting, and the importance of meticulous management of regulatory obligations. For potential buyers, caution is advised as the builder's past litigation history raises concerns regarding its operational integrity and adherence to construction regulations.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Vadodar… | Gujarat | The promoter, Shree Shiv Construction, was penali… | ["Non-filing of qua… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Shree Shiv Construc… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1SkDJ87D0GOv-17jEUHLdT02B_F2aZyy2 |