SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP

Introduction

In the competitive real estate market, selecting the right builder is paramount to ensure your dream home becomes a reality. Today, we delve into the operations of SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP, a builder based in Gujarat, examining their complaint history and legal disputes to provide potential buyers with a comprehensive overview.

Overview of SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP

SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP has registered two complaints against them, both of which resulted in cases that were lost. This notable record raises important questions about the builder's commitment to their clients and adherence to legal obligations. With projects primarily in Gujarat, it's essential for potential buyers to proceed with caution when considering this builder.

Legal Case Details

1. Case 1: The complainant claimed a refund of Rs. 5,07,333/- after voluntarily canceling their booking. The builder argued against the refund, asserting that the cancellation was not eligible for a refund according to their policies. The authority ultimately rejected the complaint based on section 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.
2. Case 2: Another complaint involved an appellant who contended that a fine of Rs. 75,000 was excessive. The builder countered by stating that the fine was legally justified as the appellant had not sufficiently proven their claims. This case ended similarly, with the authority upholding the fine and dismissing the appellant's arguments.

Analysis of Legal Disputes

Patterns in Lost Cases

Upon reviewing the two cases where SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP lost, it appears that:

• Cancellation and Refund Disputes: Both cases involved disputes related to financial matters, specifically concerning refunds and fines. The complaints suggest a pattern of dissatisfaction over financial transactions
• Lack of Evidence: In the second case, the authority noted that insufficient evidence was provided by the appellant to support their claim regarding the excessive fine. This points to possible weaknesses in documentation and claim substantiation by those in dispute with the builder.

Patterns in Won Cases

It is important to note that SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP has not won any cases. This absence of victories might indicate a tendency for complaints against the builder to be upheld by authorities.

Conclusion

The existing data indicates a somewhat troubling trend for SHREE SIDDHI INFRABUILDCON LLP, with a record of unsuccessful legal disputes leading to complaints from consumers. Potential buyers should be aware of this history as it may reflect on the reliability and accountability of the builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Thorough Research: Ensure to conduct comprehensive research regarding a builder's track record, including any legal disputes and complaint history.
• Request Detailed Documentation: Before engaging with a builder, request and review all relevant documents pertaining to past projects and dispute resolutions.
• Consult Current/Home Buyers: Reach out to individuals who have purchased from the builder to garner firsthand experiences regarding their customer service and quality of work.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

1. Assess Financial Stability: Verify the builder’s financial health to ensure they can complete your project without delays.
2. Check Reviews and Ratings: Look for customer reviews and ratings on platforms like Google, Facebook, or real estate forums.
3. Visit Past Projects: Whenever possible, visit completed projects to assess the quality of construction and adherence to timelines.
4. Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with your rights as a buyer under the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act and other consumer protection laws.

By staying informed and cautious, prospective buyers can make well-rounded decisions when it comes to real estate investments.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shree Siddhi Infrabuildcon LLP, which it lost, reveals several insights pertaining to the common themes and underlying issues related to their disputes.

One recurring theme is Refunds on Cancellation. In one instance, a complainant sought a refund of Rs. 5,07,333/- as they claimed to have voluntarily cancelled their booking. The builder contested this, asserting that the cancellation was valid. This case highlights the complexities involved in transactions, as misunderstandings or disputes over cancellations can lead to legal actions and claims for refunds.

Another theme that emerged from the cases is Penalty Disputes. In a separate case, the builder argued that a fine of Rs. 75,000 was excessive, claiming to have made a cash payment of Rs. 50,000. However, the authority upheld the fine, indicating that the builder's claims did not resonate well with regulatory compliance. This suggests that builders may sometimes find themselves in conflict with regulatory authorities regarding penalty assessments.

A significant factor leading to the construction of these disputes is the builders' contestation of imposed penalties, which often stems from disagreements over compliance with rules and regulations. For example, the cases show that the builder frequently contested fines, suggesting a tendency to challenge penalties that they deemed unjust, yet failing to support their claims adequately with sufficient evidence.

The common reasons behind the builder's losses in these cases appear to stem from insufficient evidence and regulatory non-compliance. In the refund case, the decision by the authority pointed to section 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, suggesting that the builder's arguments did not meet legal standards or criteria. Similarly, the upheld fine points to a judicial inclination to favor regulatory compliance over the builder’s claims of excessiveness.

Collectively, these cases highlight the builder's challenges in navigating disputes over compliance and financial claims. As a result, potential buyers should be discerning when entering agreements with such builders, considering the patterns of disputes and outcomes in prior cases to make informed decisions.