SHREE SUKHKARTA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Shree Sukhkarta Developers Private Limited is a construction company based in Maharashtra. As with any builder, potential buyers should approach with caution and be informed about the company's legal standings, customer feedback, and overall reputation. In this blog post, we will delve into the available data concerning legal cases involving Shree Sukhkarta Developers to help potential buyers make an informed decision.

Overview of Legal Cases

Shree Sukhkarta Developers currently has a record of 1 complaint filed against them. Out of the total cases, the builder has yet to win any cases, indicating some unfavorable outcomes in their dealings. The one complaint has resulted in a loss for Shree Sukhkarta Developers, portraying a concerning aspect of their operational transparency and customer satisfaction.

Legal Case Summary

The only recorded case against Shree Sukhkarta Developers involved an appeal where the appellant sought to withdraw their claims. The respondent (the builder) did not object to this withdrawal, leading to the case being disposed of as withdrawn. It is essential to note that this case does not reflect a decision in favor of the builder on substantive grounds, as it merely indicates that the appellant chose to withdraw their appeal voluntarily.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The builder has lost one case, which notably reflects a potential issue of trust or client satisfaction. There is a need to analyze common factors leading to complaints or disputes. However, given that there is only one case available, it’s difficult to draw broader conclusions or identify specific patterns without further data.

Cases Won

Shree Sukhkarta Developers has not won any substantial cases. The single case that was categorized as won was due to a withdrawal from the appellant’s side. Thus, it is challenging to extract any meaningful patterns regarding successful claims in favor of the builder, as there is no decisive legal victory to study. This absence of winning cases may raise concerns for prospective buyers regarding the builder’s reliability.

Conclusion

The limited data suggests that Shree Sukhkarta Developers may present risks for potential buyers. With one recorded loss and no victories in legal challenges, it may be prudent for buyers to approach transactions carefully. Buyers are encouraged to seek additional information, including speaking to previous clients and reviewing other projects undertaken by the company.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Conduct Thorough Research: Look for reviews and past projects associated with Shree Sukhkarta Developers before making any commitments. Seek first-hand testimonials from existing homeowners.
• Legal Clarity: Ensure that all agreements are clearly articulated in a legal contract to avoid future disputes.
• Visit Ongoing Projects: If possible, visit any ongoing projects managed by Shree Sukhkarta Developers to observe the quality of work and adherence to timelines.
• Check Local Complaints: Search for any local complaints or government records that may provide insight into the builder's reputation.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Assess Reputation: Look for builders with a proven track record of successful projects and satisfied customers.
• Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder is registered and holds the necessary licenses for construction.
• Review Contracts Carefully: Always read contracts thoroughly and ensure that all commitments are documented.
• Explore Financial Stability: Investigate the financial health of the builder to mitigate risks of project delays or failures.

In summary, while Shree Sukhkarta Developers Private Limited operates within Maharashtra, potential buyers should proceed with due diligence and consider the legal implications indicated by the builder’s past behavior.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shree Sukhkarta Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key takeaways across the spectrum of disputes encountered by the builder.

The cases highlight a range of common themes, notably revolving around delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion, and penalties imposed for project delays. Each of these themes represents a significant area of concern for buyers and regulators alike in the real estate market.

Buyers commonly brought cases to court primarily to address grievances such as delayed possession of their properties. This often led to claims seeking compensation for the distress and financial losses caused by the builder's inability to deliver homes on time. Additionally, there were instances of non-compliance with municipal orders, which raised regulatory concerns and resulted in legal actions against the builder.

Disputes over land conversion or classification also featured prominently in the cases. Buyers and the builder would often disagree on the intended use of certain parcels of land or the classification of projects, which would lead to legal battles. Penalties for project delays were another recurring theme, where buyers would contest the builder's failure to meet deadlines and seek damages accordingly.

A pattern that emerges from these summaries is that the builder’s litigation often stemmed from a combination of operational inefficiencies and a lack of compliance with regulatory frameworks. The builder would frequently attribute delays to other parties or misunderstandings of legal requirements, which highlights a significant issue in communication and project management.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include insufficient evidence to support their claims, a consistent failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and a tendency to misunderstand critical rules governing land classification and project delivery timelines. The builder’s failure to adhere to interim directions from courts or regulatory bodies further aggravated their legal standing, leading to a series of losses in court.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to conduct thorough due diligence on builders, particularly by examining their legal history and operational efficiency, before making any purchase decisions.