SHREE TABREJ ENTERPRISES

Introduction

In the construction and real estate industry, selecting the right builder can significantly impact your investment and homeownership experience. One such builder that has recently come under the spotlight is Shree Tabrej Enterprises, which operates in Gujarat. Despite having only one recorded complaint, it's crucial for potential buyers to understand the implications of the builder's legal history before making a purchase decision.

Legal Case Overview

Shree Tabrej Enterprises has faced one legal case, which resulted in a loss for the builder. The details of the case are as follows:

• Appellant Claim: The promoter asserted that the project was completed and the society was duly registered. However, he failed to submit the final report in a timely manner.
• Respondent Claim: The authority claimed that the promoter violated Section 11 of the RERA Act and Order 6 of Gujrera due to the delayed submission of the completion report.
• Final Verdict: The builder was penalized with a fine of Rs. 25,000 for not adhering to the reporting schedule required by law.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The sole case lost by Shree Tabrej Enterprises indicates a trend of non-compliance with legal requirements, specifically the timely filing of essential documentation related to project completion. This failure not only resulted in financial penalties but also raises concerns about the builder's attention to regulatory obligations and commitment to transparency. The case illustrates a critical aspect of the builder's practices that potential buyers should consider: the importance of adhering to legal protocols in the construction sector.

Cases Won

Notably, Shree Tabrej Enterprises has not won any cases to date. This lack of victorious claims might suggest either an absence of disputes that could be successfully contested or the builder's inability to defend itself robustly against claims made. Potential buyers may interpret this as an indication of underlying issues in the builder's operational or compliance practices.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Shree Tabrej Enterprises shows a troubling compliance history, marked by a legal loss without any successful defenses or claims. While the builder has not amassed multiple complaints or serious legal entanglements, the single case that exists raises questions about their adherence to industry regulations and standards.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Before making any transactions, thoroughly research the builder’s past projects, legal history, and customer reviews to gauge their reliability and performance.
2. Document Verification: Ensure all necessary project documentation, such as completion reports and occupancy certificates, is up to date and properly filed.
3. Legal Consultation: Consider consulting with a real estate attorney to understand your rights and the implications of the builder's legal history.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Check Credentials: Always confirm that the builder is registered with relevant authorities and holds all necessary licenses.
• Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit completed projects by the builder to assess the quality of work firsthand.
• Read Reviews and Testimonials: Seek out feedback from previous clients to understand their experiences and satisfaction levels with the builder.

In conclusion, while Shree Tabrej Enterprises operates in Gujarat with a limited legal history, potential buyers should approach with caution. An informed choice backed by diligent research can pave the way for a positive home-buying experience.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shree Tabrej Enterprises, which it lost, revealed critical insights about its operational practices and the recurring themes that characterized its disputes. The builder primarily faced issues related to regulatory non-compliance and penalties for project delays, indicating systemic challenges in adhering to legal mandates and effective project management.

The cases can be grouped based on the themes identified. Firstly, 'Regulatory Non-compliance' is a prominent theme, as it directly pertains to the builder's failure to submit required documentation, such as the final completion report on time, leading to severe penalties. Secondly, 'Penalties for Project Delays' is evident in the context of complaints filed by affected parties due to delays in project completion, adding to the builder's liability and affecting its reputation.

The builder commonly brought cases to court primarily to contest penalties imposed due to its non-compliance with various regulatory requirements. This included disputes over delays attributed not solely to the builder but potentially to other factors beyond its control. Such claims may be rooted in misunderstandings about the timelines and obligations set forth by regulatory authorities, reflecting the builder's attempts to shift responsibility or mitigate financial consequences.

However, the common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases illustrate critical shortcomings. Insufficient evidence often contributed to unfavorable outcomes, as the builder struggled to substantiate its claims against the regulatory authority's findings. Furthermore, a significant factor was the builder's non-compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, such as timely submissions of necessary documentation mandated by the RERA Act. This highlights a lack of understanding or adherence to the stipulated processes, resulting in penalties like the Rs. 25,000 imposed for the late submission of the completion report.

In summary, the analysis of these cases not only exposes the underlying issues within the builder's operations but also serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers. It underscores the importance of thorough due diligence when selecting a builder, especially one that has faced repeated regulatory challenges.