SHREE VARDHMAN DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED

Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited: Overview

Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited has made its mark in the real estate sector, primarily focusing on projects in Haryana. With only one recorded complaint in their account and an undefeated record in legal proceedings, this builder presents a unique proposition for potential buyers.

Legal Record Analysis

Cases Overview

• Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0

Details of the Legal Case

In the case against Shree Vardhman Developers, the details provided state that the project promoters had already received a part completion certificate. This means that while the case was filed against them, the legal outcome was favorable, suggesting no fault on their side regarding how they managed the project completion and registration. The final verdict indicated that they would register the project when ready for marketing the second phase, signaling their commitment to moving forward with project phases responsibly.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Won

Considering Shree Vardhman’s record of one case won, it reflects a competent handling of project-related legal matters thus far. The favorable outcome suggests that they adhered to regulations and fulfilled obligations tied to project completions. This might hint towards:

• Proactive communication with stakeholders and buyers.
• Commitment to transparency in their project execution.

Cases Lost

Although Shree Vardhman Developers did not lose any cases, it is essential to analyze the existing complaint. The situation where they had a complaint but emerged victorious may indicate:

• Corrective measures taken post-complaint leading to resolution.
• Professional management possibly mitigating escalations into severe disputes.

Conclusion: A Builder’s Assessment

Overall, Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited displays a reassuring legal track record. Their singular complaint and successful defense highlight their potential reliability as a builder. Still, buyers should carry out their due diligence and verify their standing further.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Shree Vardhman Developers

1. Research Project Details: Understand the specific projects they are involved in, the completion timelines, and ensure you are comfortable with the available information about those projects.
2. Engage with Previous Buyers: Connect with individuals who have previously purchased properties from Shree Vardhman to gauge their experiences.
3. Seek Legal Advice: Before making any investment, it might be wise to consult with a legal advisor who can dissect the project agreements and ensure your rights are protected.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder

• Check for Complaints: Look at the builder's history for complaints and understand how they handle issues.
• Full Transparency: Choose builders known for their openness regarding project statuses and other commitments.
• Quality Assurance: Investigate the quality of past projects to ensure they align with what you are looking for in your investment.
• Regulatory Compliance: Ensure your builder is adhered to local building codes and regulations, which safeguards your investment in the long run.

By following these tips and keeping an informed perspective, buyers can make educated decisions when entering into contracts with builders like Shree Vardhman Developers.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited, which the builder won, revealed several recurring themes that highlight primary disputes. The major categories of disputes include 'Delayed Possession Claims,' where buyers often alleged that the builder failed to deliver homes on time; 'Project Completion Certificates,' relating to complaints against the registration of projects; and 'Disputes Over Marketing Phases,' where conflicts arose regarding when the builder could begin marketing subsequent phases of development. There were also elements of 'Regulatory Compliance and Registration,' as some cases addressed issues pertaining to the builder's compliance with local regulations and the associated legal requirements for project registration.

The reasons for these cases being brought to court primarily revolved around contesting penalties, claims of project delays, and disagreements over land classification or the legitimacy of marketing phases. A common pattern emerged, indicating that buyers occasionally had misunderstandings regarding the builders’ obligations or the status of the development, leading them to seek legal recourse.

On the flip side, the common reasons the builder prevailed in these cases included presenting insufficient evidence from opposing parties, the builder's adherence to legal and regulatory requirements, and showing that any claims made were possibly exaggerated or unfounded. In several instances, the builder demonstrated robust evidence of their compliance with timelines and processes, effectively countering accusations that may have stemmed from buyer misapprehensions.

From this analysis, we can glean that Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited has established a reputation for defending itself competently against unjust claims in the market. This situation underscores a notable insight: buyers can sometimes make false or exaggerated accusations, which in turn may lead to contentious legal proceedings. It highlights the importance of judicial processes that ensure builders are not unfairly treated through miscarriages of accusations.

In conclusion, potential buyers should be advised on the importance of making informed decisions when entering the real estate market. Despite the existence of legitimate concerns, the analysis of these cases demonstrates that builders like Shree Vardhman Developers and Infrastructure Private Limited can successfully defend against incorrect claims. Therefore, buyers are encouraged to approach claims with caution, seeking out reliable information and insights about a builder’s track record before forming judgments regarding their reputation.