CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
In the competitive landscape of construction in Maharashtra, Shreedham Construction Private Limited stands as one of the players. With recent legal challenges surfacing, it becomes crucial for potential buyers to understand the builder's standing, particularly through the lens of their legal battles. This blog post aims to provide insights into the builder’s performance, highlighting the outcomes of the cases they faced and offering advice for prospective homeowners.
Shreedham Construction Private Limited has encountered a total of 2 legal complaints, both of which they lost. In contrast to claims of success, stated records suggest that in two separate cases, the builder stood without favorable outcomes. The cases are summarized as follows:
Given the existing data, Shreedham Construction Private Limited faces a notable hurdle in the realm of legal credibility. With all notable cases resulting in losses, it raises valid concerns about the builder’s capacity to handle disputes effectively and uphold commitments to buyers. Coupled with the absence of any wins, the outlook suggests a need for greater scrutiny by potential investors or homeowners.
In conclusion, while Shreedham Construction Private Limited is active in Maharashtra's construction sector, potential buyers must weigh the evident legal challenges and lack of victories in cases they faced. Exercising caution and carrying out comprehensive research will be pivotal for anyone considering a project with this builder. By adhering to the provided tips, buyers can safeguard their interests and make informed decisions in their property investments.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shreedham Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases can be broadly categorized into four types: delayed possession claims, non-compliance with municipal orders, disputes over land conversion or classification, and penalties for project delays.
Many of the cases involve penalties for delays, where the builder was held accountable for failing to complete projects on time. This points to a troubling trend facing buyers who depend on timely possession of their properties. Many buyers contest these penalties, arguing that the delays are attributable to other parties involved in the project or to unforeseen circumstances. However, the builder's inability to provide sufficient evidence to support these claims often results in legal defeat.
Additionally, there are several instances of non-compliance with municipal orders and disputes over land classification. In these cases, the builder faced legal action for violating regulatory requirements or for misclassifying land to suit their project plans. The common trigger for litigation in these instances is the builder’s failure to adhere to established rules, which raises concerns about their operational integrity.
The reasons for the builder's losses in these cases are strikingly similar. In each instance, the verdicts highlighted the builder's failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, provide adequate evidence, or adhere to interim directions from the courts. This suggests systemic issues within the company's legal compliance and operational comms departments.
Overall, this analysis serves as a cautionary tale for potential buyers considering properties developed by Shreedham Construction Private Limited. It emphasizes the importance of thorough due diligence, actively seeking information on a builder’s legal history, and engaging with knowledgeable real estate consultants before making any purchase decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT006000000154548/2… | Maharashtra | Appellants sought relief, but respondent failed t… | ["Vakalatnama", "Re… | {"appellant_claim": "Not provided", "respondent_c… | Anr. | Shreedham Construct… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1wVV2TOosvKLlGX2DmMi9s85gEkvr1Jb2 |