| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Understanding SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION: A Comprehensive Review of Complaints and Legal Outcomes
When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, potential buyers often face a plethora of options, making it crucial to scrutinize the track record of each builder. In this post, we delve into the case of SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION, focusing on the numbers of complaints filed, cases won, and the outcomes of legal disputes. This aim is to equip prospective buyers with insights that will guide their decision-making process.
Overview of SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION
SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION operates primarily in Maharashtra and has a record of attracting a significant number of complaints—totaling 139. Out of these, they have successfully won 92 cases while losing 47. Understanding the nature and outcomes of these disputes sheds light on the builder’s reliability and ongoing issues.
Patterns in Cases Lost
Analyzing the 47 cases lost by SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION reveals a recurring theme: many …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shreeji Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three common themes: delay condensation claims, limitation period disputes, and delays in filing appeals.
The majority of the cases involve claims from the appellants that they filed their appeals within the allowed limitation period after accounting for the time taken to obtain certified copies of the impugned orders. In each instance, the builder contested this, asserting that the appeals were filed late. However, the verdicts consistently favored the appellants, indicating a systemic issue in the builder's understanding or application of the limitation periods.
A notable pattern emerges where the builder frequently attributes delays to other parties or seeks to condone significant lapses in time before filing their cases. This raises concerns about project management practices and the builder's compliance with timelines, which could be …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION, which it lost, revealed several insights into the recurring themes and challenges faced by the builder.
Firstly, the cases predominantly revolved around key topics like 'Delayed Possession Claims', where buyers may have experienced extended delays in receiving their properties, leading to disputes. Secondly, many cases centered on 'Disputes over Consent Terms', indicating contention between the builder and buyers regarding compliance with previously agreed-upon terms. Furthermore, there were instances of 'Non-compliance with Agreements', revealing issues relating to the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements and commitments. Lastly, 'Regulatory Compliance Issues' often surfaced, suggesting that the builder may not have fully understood or met all the necessary legal obligations tied to development projects.
This builder frequently brought cases to court to contest penalties or penalties related to project delays, indicating a tendency to challenge decisions that impacted their operational timeline. Additionally, …
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be categorized into a few key themes, predominantly focusing on 'Delayed Possession Claims' where claimants argued that the builder failed to hand over flats within the specified timeframe, causing distress. The builder responded by attributing these delays to external factors such as statutory approvals from government authorities.
Additionally, many cases revolved around 'Settlement through Consent Terms' where disputes ended amicably, indicating a tendency towards negotiation and resolution outside of lengthy legal battles. Finally, there were 'Disputes with Respondents over Claims' where various claims made by the parties were found unsubstantiated, resulting in cases that were often disposed of based on mutual agreement to settle the matter without further contention.
The primary reasons for the builder bringing cases to court typically included contesting penalties related to project delays, disputing allegations …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!