Analysis of the cases filed against Shreeji Construction, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns across the disputes. The cases primarily revolve around three common themes: delay condensation claims, limitation period disputes, and delays in filing appeals.

The majority of the cases involve claims from the appellants that they filed their appeals within the allowed limitation period after accounting for the time taken to obtain certified copies of the impugned orders. In each instance, the builder contested this, asserting that the appeals were filed late. However, the verdicts consistently favored the appellants, indicating a systemic issue in the builder's understanding or application of the limitation periods.

A notable pattern emerges where the builder frequently attributes delays to other parties or seeks to condone significant lapses in time before filing their cases. This raises concerns about project management practices and the builder's compliance with timelines, which could be a common trigger for litigation.

The reasons for the builder’s losses in these cases are strikingly similar. Most verdicts highlight the builder's failure to recognize or adhere to the established limitation periods for filing appeals. This suggests a potential lack of legal counsel or a misunderstanding of the regulatory framework surrounding real estate projects. Since the builder did not provide claims in several cases, it is also possible that insufficient evidence was presented during the hearings, further contributing to their losses.

Overall, this analysis indicates that prospective buyers should exercise caution when considering projects by Shreeji Construction. The builder's recurrent losses in legal disputes, particularly those concerning delay claims and limitation periods, may signify broader operational inefficiencies that could impact delivery timelines and the overall purchasing experience. It is crucial for buyers to conduct thorough due diligence, seek direct testimonials from previous buyers, and closely examine the builder's legal history before making any investment decisions.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION, which it lost, revealed several insights into the recurring themes and challenges faced by the builder.

Firstly, the cases predominantly revolved around key topics like 'Delayed Possession Claims', where buyers may have experienced extended delays in receiving their properties, leading to disputes. Secondly, many cases centered on 'Disputes over Consent Terms', indicating contention between the builder and buyers regarding compliance with previously agreed-upon terms. Furthermore, there were instances of 'Non-compliance with Agreements', revealing issues relating to the builder's adherence to regulatory requirements and commitments. Lastly, 'Regulatory Compliance Issues' often surfaced, suggesting that the builder may not have fully understood or met all the necessary legal obligations tied to development projects.

This builder frequently brought cases to court to contest penalties or penalties related to project delays, indicating a tendency to challenge decisions that impacted their operational timeline. Additionally, disputes often arose from disagreements over land classification and regulatory compliance, where the builder sought to invalidate claims or penalties they deemed unjustified.

The common reasons SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION lost these cases seem to stem from several critical factors. A notable point was a potential lack of sufficient evidence to prove their claims or justify their defenses. Furthermore, instances of non-compliance with legal requirements pointed towards gaps in following essential procedures and regulations, which ultimately hurt their case in a legal context. Also, misunderstanding land or project classification rules came to light, revealing a need for better legal guidance and clarity in project documentation.

Overall, these case summaries suggest that potential buyers should exercise caution when considering a purchase from SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION. The recurring legal challenges hint at operational deficiencies within the builder's practices, prompting due diligence and thorough investigation into their prior engagements before any commitment.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases can be categorized into a few key themes, predominantly focusing on 'Delayed Possession Claims' where claimants argued that the builder failed to hand over flats within the specified timeframe, causing distress. The builder responded by attributing these delays to external factors such as statutory approvals from government authorities.

Additionally, many cases revolved around 'Settlement through Consent Terms' where disputes ended amicably, indicating a tendency towards negotiation and resolution outside of lengthy legal battles. Finally, there were 'Disputes with Respondents over Claims' where various claims made by the parties were found unsubstantiated, resulting in cases that were often disposed of based on mutual agreement to settle the matter without further contention.

The primary reasons for the builder bringing cases to court typically included contesting penalties related to project delays, disputing allegations of non-compliance, and negotiations for settlement terms. A common trigger for the litigation involved disputes over perceived delays, especially when the builder could attribute those delays to factors beyond their control.

On the other hand, the cases the builder won frequently centered around the opposing party’s lack of sufficient evidence to support its claims. Moreover, there were instances of regulatory non-compliance from respondents, indicating that some cases were brought forth based on misunderstandings of legal obligations. The builder effectively defended itself against accusations that may have been exaggerated or unfounded.

This thorough analysis reveals valuable insights regarding SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION's reputation in the real estate market. It uncovers a pattern wherein buyers sometimes lodge claims against builders, which may lead to legal disputes. This scenario indicates that the builder maintains a robust strategy for defending itself and addressing claims made against it, exemplifying its commitment to navigating the complexities of the real estate landscape.

In light of these findings, potential buyers are encouraged to make informed decisions when entering into agreements with builders. While legitimate disputes do occur within this sphere, understanding that builders like SHREEJI CONSTRUCTION often successfully contest unjust claims is crucial. It is advisable for buyers to thoughtfully evaluate claims and seek reliable information, ensuring they don’t form hasty judgments about a builder's reputation.