SHREEJI DEVELOPER

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, the reputation of a builder is paramount for potential buyers. This post examines SHREEJI DEVELOPER, a builder with a significant number of legal cases, reflecting either challenges in their operations or deficiencies in meeting buyer expectations. With 125 complaints filed against them, of which only 10 resulted in favorable rulings, understanding the context of these complaints can guide prospective buyers in their decision-making process.

Overview of SHREEJI DEVELOPER

SHREEJI DEVELOPER is principally active in the state of Gujarat. Despite being involved in numerous projects, their track record raises considerable concerns. Out of a total of 125 complaints:

• Cases Won: 10
• Cases Lost: 115

This heavily tilted ratio of losses versus wins indicates a substantial risk factor for consumers.

Legal Case Patterns

Cases the Builder Lost

1. Common Issues: A predominant theme in the cases won against SHREEJI DEVELOPER involves the failure …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Shreeji Developers, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the builder's dealings and the common themes that arose in litigation.

The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including disputes over the registration of sale documents, compensation payment disagreements, issues related to maintenance deposit refunds, failures to comply with RERA regulations, and project delays/incomplete facilities.

In many instances, the complaints revolved around the builder's failure to register sale documents after receiving full or substantial compensation payments from buyers. This points to an apparent mismanagement or neglect of legal documentation, which is critical in real estate transactions.

Compensation payment disputes were another frequent theme, where buyers claimed to have paid most of the agreed-upon amount, yet faced resistance from the builder when it came to registering the sale documents. This suggests a systemic issue in the builder's payment verification and documentation …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed by Shreeji Developer, which it lost, reveals several concerning trends pertaining to their operational practices and compliance with legal frameworks. These cases can be grouped into common themes that highlight their primary disputes and weaknesses.

Firstly, under the theme of Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements, Shreeji Developer faced multiple penalties due to failure to meet reporting obligations on time as mandated by the RERA Act. This includes their inability to file quarterly reports, which was a recurring issue highlighted in the court summaries. The builder frequently cited unforeseen circumstances for their delays, but these claims were not accepted as valid defenses by the authorities.

Additionally, the theme of Penalties for Reporting Delays emerges strongly. The authority consistently fined Shreeji Developers for not submitting the necessary documentation within stipulated timelines. The penalties ranged from ₹25,000 to ₹8,50,000, indicating the seriousness of their non-compliance and …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, SHREEJI DEVELOPER, which it won, revealed the following information. The key recurring themes highlight the builder's primary disputes, which can be grouped into four main categories: Registration of Sale Documents, Payment Disputes, Formation of Cooperative Societies, and Maintenance Deposit Issues. These themes illustrate the complex interactions between builders and buyers, often revolving around contractual obligations and regulatory compliance.

1. Registration of Sale Documents: Many cases focused on the failure to register sale documents, with complainants arguing that they had paid most of the compensation due but had not received the necessary documents. In contrast, the builder often claimed that full payments were not made, which led to the issuance delays.
2. Payment Disputes: A recurring issue in the cases was the payment or compensation disputes. Complainants claimed that they were willing to pay the outstanding amounts but cited …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder SHREEJI DEVELOPER, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily fall into two key themes: Disputes Over Allottee Claims and Delayed Possession Claims. Each type outlines the common issues that both buyers and the builder have faced during legal proceedings.

1. Disputes Over Allottee Claims: Many of the cases involved claims by complainants asserting that they were original allottees of specific flats. In the summaries provided, the complainants sought registered sale documents for flats, only to be countered by the builder claiming that these flats had already been sold to other parties. The authority ruled in favor of the builder, establishing that the claims of the complainants lacked validity as they were not the original allottees.
2. Delayed Possession Claims: Another recurring theme centered around delayed possession of flats. In one case, the complainant alleged …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis