| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the evolving real estate market of Gujarat, Shreeji Realty stands out as a builder with a blend of promise and challenges. This article delves into the legal landscape surrounding Shreeji Realty, assessing their performance through the lens of customer complaints and legal cases.
Overview of Shreeji Realty
Shreeji Realty has been identified with 3 recorded complaints. Unfortunately, the builder has not managed to win any of the cases they were involved in, having lost all three disputes.
Legal Case Analysis
Cases Lost
- Flat Issues in 'Windward Business Park': One prominent complaint involved a customer who faced issues with a flat booked in Shreeji Realty's 'Windward Business Park' project. While the builder claimed that they had resolved the issues, the final outcome was that the complaint was withdrawn due to an amicable resolution between the parties. This case highlights a possible trend where resolutions often depend on direct negotiations rather than legal victories.
Cases Won
In contrast, Shreeji Realty has faced two cases where they emerged victorious:
- Violation of RERA: In a case concerning an advertisement lacking the RERA registration number, the verdict resulted in the builder being fined Rs. 1,25,000 for unintentional oversight, showcasing a compliance issue despite a win.
- Completion Certificate: The second case dealt with the completion of a project. Shreeji Realty claimed to have completed the project while the registration of the society was pending, leading to a minor penalty of Rs. 20,000. This indicates that while the builder may have delivered on the project completion, procedural shortcomings can still lead to penalties, reflecting a tendency towards operational challenges.
Patterns and Common Factors
Complaints and Lost Cases
The lost cases mainly revolved around customer dissatisfaction related to specific projects, suggesting a potential issue in project execution or communication. The amicable resolutions imply that while legal disputes arise, customers are open to resolving issues externally, perhaps indicating a trust deficit that needs to be addressed.
Won Cases
The cases won by Shreeji Realty point to procedural violations rather than customer-centric issues. The penalties suggest that while compliance with regulations is essential, the builder managed to avoid more significant legal ramifications. This can indicate a recognized commitment to maintain minimum standards despite facing operational hurdles.
Conclusion
Shreeji Realty presents a mixed bag of experiences for buyers, with several complaints and a complete loss record in litigation. Potential buyers should exercise caution and conduct thorough due diligence. Here are some tips for prospective clients considering properties from Shreeji Realty:
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Project Reviews: Look for reviews or testimonials from previous clients regarding specific projects, especially 'Windward Business Park.'
- Visit Completed Projects: Physically visit properties completed by Shreeji Realty to gauge quality and authenticity.
- Seek Legal Advice: Consider speaking with legal experts if you encounter any concerns during the buying process to understand your rights and remedies.
General Tips for Selecting Any Builder
- Check Credentials: Always verify the builder's credentials, including their track record and regulatory compliance.
- Evaluate Financial Stability: Review the builder's financial health to ensure their projects are not at risk of delays.
- Understand the Contract: Be clear about all terms in the sale agreement, including timelines, payment schedules, and penalties for delays.
In conclusion, while Shreeji Realty has its merits, potential buyers should approach with careful scrutiny, ensuring all aspects of purchasing from this builder are transparent and satisfactory.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shreeji Realty that the builder lost revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance, penalties for project delays, and accidental omissions in advertising.
The first type of case involves regulatory non-compliance, particularly concerning the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In one significant case, Shreeji Realty was fined for failing to mention the required RERA registration number in an advertisement. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal consequences due to oversight or accidental violations of regulatory requirements.
Another theme emerges around penalties for project delays. Builders often face scrutiny over completion timelines, and Shreeji Realty was no exception. In one case, the builder claimed to have completed a project yet faced a penalty due to the pending registration of the society. This indicates that even when builders believe they have fulfilled their obligations, there may be additional legal or regulatory steps that can lead to delays and penalties.
The common reasons people brought cases against Shreeji Realty primarily revolved around the builder’s failure to adhere to regulatory standards and timelines. There were instances where the builder contested penalties, arguing that certain violations were accidental rather than intentional. However, the underlying pattern suggests that non-compliance with legal requirements was a significant trigger for the litigation.
Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that Shreeji Realty lost primarily due to insufficient adherence to regulations, including advertising requirements and project completion obligations. The builder's defenses often revolved around claims of accidental actions or completed projects, yet the decisions underscored the need for meticulous compliance in the real estate sector. Overall, these cases serve as a reminder for prospective buyers to exercise diligence when evaluating builders' track records regarding regulatory adherence and timely project delivery.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GJ/CMP/NCQR/Panchma… | Gujarat | Shreeji Realty failed to submit the final report … | ["Non-submission of… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "Shre… | Shreeji Realty | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1772ELecsGAJBBic_TYzIdmdOIeWp_QQq | |
| 52/2019 | Gujarat | The promoter-developer of 'Auro Heights-2' projec… | ["RERA registration… | {"appellant_claim": "The appellant claimed that t… | Gujarat Real Estate… | Shreeji Realty, Aur… | https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1J_D7Z37VDSwQA-tocqsVZl0yBciFNCBD |
Here you’ll find cases where the builder sued others but didn’t win. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shreeji Realty, where it lost, reveals interesting insights into the nature of disputes they encountered. One notable theme is the resolution of complaints, often resulting in withdrawal. In the case examined, the complaint from the client regarding issues with their flat in the 'Windward Business Park' project was eventually resolved amicably between the parties involved. This suggests that while disputes may arise, there is a capacity for dialogue and resolution which can prevent prolonged litigation.
The primary cases filed by Shreeji Realty often revolved around project issues and client satisfaction. Clients raised concerns regarding their properties, while the builder claimed to have resolved these issues. The disputes suggest that there may have been initial dissatisfaction from clients, which then influenced the builder’s decision to seek legal recourse. However, the ability to reach amicable solutions highlights a willingness to resolve disputes without extensive legal battles, perhaps indicating an underlying desire for a positive customer experience.
Common reasons for the builder to take legal action included contesting customer claims regarding project deficiencies or complaints about flat conditions. In this particular case, the builder faced a situation where the claimant believed their concerns warranted legal attention. The pattern here indicates that issues of project quality or service delivery are at the forefront of the builder's challenges.
The loss in these cases can be attributed to a combination of factors. Firstly, there appears to be a lack of sufficient legal ground to contest the claims made by clients, leading to disputes being resolved outside of court. Additionally, the resolution of issues before reaching a verdict suggests that the builder may not have fully understood or complied with customer expectations and regulatory requirements. The amicable resolutions also indicate a potential failure on the builder's part in managing client relationships proactively, which could derive from misunderstandings or unmet obligations regarding project deliverables. Overall, understanding these disputes can provide important insights for prospective buyers considering Shreeji Realty as a builder.