| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction
In the world of real estate, the reputation of builders plays a crucial role for homebuyers. SHREENATH BUILDCON, based in Rajasthan, has been a subject of scrutiny due to its involvement in a significant number of legal cases. This blog post delves into the performance of SHREENATH BUILDCON, examining patterns in its legal challenges and offering insights for potential buyers.
Overview of SHREENATH BUILDCON
SHREENATH BUILDCON has faced a total of 75 complaints, resulting in 39 cases won and 36 cases lost. The builder operates primarily in Rajasthan, providing a focused market presence within the state. The legal battles, particularly concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) under the Real Estate Regulation and Development Act (RERA), form the crux of the complaints against the company.
Legal Case Analysis
Complaints and Losses
In analyzing the 36 cases that SHREENATH BUILDCON lost, a common pattern emerges:
- Submission of QPRs: Most complaints centered around the failure to submit the required Quarterly Progress Reports on the RERA web portal. The appellants alleged non-compliance, which the builder contested by claiming technical issues hindering the upload process.
- Penalties and Directions: The final verdicts often directed the builder to upload the pending QPRs, pay penalties, and deposit delay processing charges. The consistent theme of penalties suggests administrative lapses rather than outright fraud or neglect.
This indicates that the builder may have faced operational or organizational challenges in fulfilling regulatory obligations, necessitating immediate corrective measures to avoid recurrent issues in the future.
Victories and Defenses
Conversely, in the 39 cases SHREENATH BUILDCON won, the following trends were noted:
- Claims of Submission: Many cases involved disputes regarding whether the QPRs had been submitted at all, with the builder often succeeding in arguing that submissions were made, albeit disputed by the appellants.
- Technical Justifications: The builder frequently defended its position by citing technical issues that led to the non-reflection of submissions on the RERA portal, which resonated positively with the authorities in several rulings.
These victories highlight that SHREENATH BUILDCON was able to effectively navigate various claims regarding compliance, showcasing its adherence to project progress reporting when appropriately documented.
Conclusion
Overall Assessment
Despite its considerable number of legal challenges, SHREENATH BUILDCON has managed to win nearly half of its cases, reflecting a mixed performance. While the losses indicate areas needing improvement in compliance and reporting, the wins suggest that the builder can present strong defenses when adequately prepared.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Research Thoroughly: Buyers should examine the builder's track record. Understanding past complaints and legal outcomes can provide insights into potential risks.
- Request Documentation: Ensure that the builder provides documented proof of compliance with RERA and any associated reporting requirements before proceeding with a purchase.
- Understand Your Rights: Familiarize yourself with the rights and recourses available under RERA, as this knowledge can protect you against potential future disputes.
General Buyer Tips
- Check Reviews: Look for buyer reviews and feedback on various platforms. Peer experiences can highlight strengths and weaknesses of the builder.
- Compare Builders: Don't settle solely on one builder; compare multiple builders before making a choice, focusing on their legal standings, reputation, and project quality.
In conclusion, while SHREENATH BUILDCON presents both opportunities and risks, an informed buyer can navigate the complexities of the real estate market more effectively.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against the builder SHREENATH BUILDCON, which it lost, revealed several key themes across the various disputes. The primary issues revolve around the builder's failure to comply with the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, particularly concerning the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) on the RERA web portal.
The primary type of case involved accusations that the builder had not submitted the required QPRs, which led to penalties and potential revocation of registration. The builder consistently claimed that QPRs had been submitted, often attributing the lack of records on the RERA portal to technical issues. However, the Authority did not accept these defenses and repeatedly directed the builder to upload the pending reports and pay applicable penalties.
A common reason for litigation in these cases was the builder's dispute over the penalties imposed for the late or non-submission of QPRs. The builder often argued that the penalties were unjustified or that the delays were beyond their control due to technical problems. This pattern suggests that one of the main triggers for the builder’s litigation was a desire to contest the financial repercussions of their failure to adhere to reporting requirements.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims of timely submission. Although they frequently cited technical issues as a cause for non-compliance, the RERA Authority likely required more concrete proof of report submissions than the builder could provide. Furthermore, the repeated failures to comply with interim directions to submit pending QPRs and pay penalties indicated a broader non-compliance with legal and regulatory standards, which undermined the builder's position in court.
In summary, the cases against SHREENATH BUILDCON highlight significant concerns regarding the builder's adherence to RERA regulations and their responsibility to maintain transparency in their projects through timely reporting. Buyers should take these legal issues into account when contemplating a purchase from this builder, as they may indicate potential delays or complications down the line.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F. 3(601)/2017 | Rajasthan | The respondent promoter failed to complete the pr… | ["Failure to comple… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Shree Nath Buildcon | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/6213F.3(601).pdf |
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, but the builder won. We’ve included a summary and key insights from each case.
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHREENATH BUILDCON, which the builder won, revealed several key themes and insights regarding the disputes between the builder and the appellants. The disputes primarily revolved around non-compliance with regulatory requirements, specifically focusing on the submission of Quarterly Progress Reports (QPRs) as mandated by RERA.
The various cases showcased a recurring pattern where appellants initially claimed that SHREENATH BUILDCON had failed to submit the required QPRs on time, asserting that these delays could lead to penalties or even the potential revocation of registration. Many appellants also claimed to have disputed the builder's defense of having submitted these reports, yet the builder effectively countered these claims with assertions of technical difficulties in uploading, which were recognized by the Authority as valid excuses.
One of the common reasons for bringing these cases to court included contesting the penalties imposed on the builder due to delays in report submissions, with some cases highlighting disagreements over the actual submission of documents and their reflection on the RERA web portal. This suggests a lack of communication or understanding often led to escalations in disputes.
The builder's successes in these cases stem from several factors: the lack of sufficient evidence from the opposing parties to substantiate their claims, instances of non-compliance by the appellants themselves in providing necessary documentation, and even technical misunderstandings regarding the submission process. Additionally, the Authority consistently directed the builder to comply with the procedural aspects, indicating that the builder was mostly diligent in its responses.
This analysis sheds light on SHREENATH BUILDCON's reputation and its ability to navigate the legal landscape. It emphasizes that misunderstandings can lead to false accusations, and sometimes, buyers may overreact to perceived issues, necessitating legal interventions. Despite the challenge of dealing with certain claims, SHREENATH BUILDCON has displayed a strong defense against what can often be exaggerated complaints.
Potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions based on reliable information. While disputes in the real estate market can arise legitimately, it's crucial to consider the context and veracity of claims against builders such as SHREENATH BUILDCON. Buyers should weigh their options carefully, looking beyond sensational claims and ensuring they consult adequate sources before forming any judgments about a builder's reputation.