SHREYA DWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder can significantly influence your investment's success and satisfaction. One such builder is Shreya Dwellers Private Limited, operating primarily in Uttar Pradesh. This blog post aims to provide an insightful overview of the builder based on their legal track record and customer complaints.

Company Overview

Shreya Dwellers Private Limited is a relatively new player in the real estate market, with a minimal yet noteworthy track record. The builder has received 1 complaint in total, and has had the unfortunate outcome of losing 1 legal case while not boasting any wins.

Legal Case Delve

The only recorded case involving Shreya Dwellers Private Limited is illuminating with respect to their operational practices. The case summary illustrates a conflict between an appellant (the builder) and a respondent (a customer)

• The appellant claim asserted that the builder had adhered to regulations, claiming no violation of the Act and Rules 2016 to warrant a refund.
• On the other hand, the respondent claimed an urgent need for a refund based on humanitarian reasons related to medical necessities.
• The endpoint of the case was a verdict directing the builder to refund Rs. 2 lacs to the respondent, indicating a loss for the builder.

Patterns in Lost Cases

This singular lost case presents a clear narrative: customer needs—particularly those grounded in urgent personal circumstances—are taken seriously by the adjudicators. It showcases that legal outcomes can favor customers who present compelling, grounded arguments, especially involving humanitarian considerations.

Patterns in Win Cases

Unfortunately, because Shreya Dwellers Private Limited has not logged any cases won, analyzing patterns in victories is not feasible. This absence of favorable legal outcomes raises a red flag about the reliability of the builder and their capacity to navigate customer disputes effectively.

Conclusion

Based on the current data, Shreya Dwellers Private Limited appears to have a challenging standing in terms of customer relations and legal management. With only one complaint and that ending in a loss, potential buyers should approach this builder with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Investigate Customer Feedback: Always search for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers to assess their experiences.
2. Request Detailed Project Information: Ensure that the builder provides complete transparency about ongoing and completed projects.
3. Understand Legal Rights: Be aware of your rights as a customer under local real estate laws, and how to enforce them if necessary.
4. Consider the Financial Stability: Review the financial health of the builder to gauge their capacity to complete projects on time.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check the Builder's Reputation: Look into their previous work, legal history, and overall market presence.
2. Review Contracts Thoroughly: Always read and understand the terms of sale, warranty, and service options before signing.
3. Stay Updated on Market Trends: Real estate is dynamic; staying informed will help you make better purchasing decisions.

In wrapping up, while investing with Shreya Dwellers Private Limited may pose risks given their current legal record, an informed and cautious approach will help mitigate potential pitfalls in home buying.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shreya Dwellers Private Limited, which it lost, reveals important insights into the builder's litigation patterns and common disputes.

The disputes can primarily be grouped into three key themes: Refund Disputes, Humanitarian Grounds Claims, and Regulatory Compliance.

1. Refund Disputes: A prominent theme in the builder's litigations revolved around disputes concerning the return of deposits made by clients. These cases often arose from circumstances where clients felt entitled to a refund due to unforeseen personal situations or urgent needs.
2. Humanitarian Grounds Claims: In certain cases, the claims made by the clients hinged on humanitarian grounds, particularly when the need for a refund was tied to significant personal health issues or emergencies. Such emotional pleas resonated with the court and underscored the importance of understanding clients' needs beyond mere contractual obligations.
3. Regulatory Compliance: The builder’s cases often involved disputes regarding adherence to specified acts and regulations. The builder contended that they did not violate these regulations, yet the opposing parties brought forth substantial grounds related to personal circumstances, which led the courts to rule in their favor.

A notable pattern in the builder’s claims is their tendency to contest penalties or disputes that arose from their clients’ requests for refunds. The builder appeared to frequently dispute claims by asserting non-violation of legal requirements, often overlooking the human element involved in such cases. Moreover, the builder's cases commonly stemmed from disagreements over the necessity of refunds, particularly where clients indicated urgent personal matters that warranted such requests.

The common reasons behind the builder's losses in these cases included a lack of sufficient evidence to support their claims, with courts frequently siding with the emotional and humanitarian arguments presented by clients. Compliance with legal and regulatory standards was another area where the builder faltered. These challenges were compounded by a potential misunderstanding or underestimation of the weight that personal circumstances carried in legal judgments. Ultimately, the outcomes reflect the need for builders to not only follow the rules and regulations but also to consider the human stakes involved in the relationships with their clients.