SHRI ABJIBAPA INFA

Introduction

In the competitive realm of real estate, the reputation of a builder can greatly influence the decision-making process of prospective homebuyers. This blog post delves into the track record of Shri Abjibapa Infa, a builder operating in Gujarat, focusing on their legal encounters and overall standing based on the available data.

Builder Overview

Name: Shri Abjibapa Infa
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1
States with Projects: Gujarat

Shri Abjibapa Infa has had one legal complaint lodged against it, which resulted in the builder losing the case, further solidifying a cautious outlook for potential buyers.

Legal Case Details

The analysis of the single legal case against Shri Abjibapa Infa reveals important facets of their operational practices:

• Nature of the Complaint: The complaint arose when the builder was found guilty for violating guidelines regarding the RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) registration. Specifically, the issue centered on the font size of the registration number and website address being smaller than the contact details of the promoter.
• Verdict: The final verdict determined that the builder was guilty of the stated violation, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 20,000 as per Gujrera circular no. 18.

Analysis of Legal Outcome

Patterns in Lost Cases

The builder has a concerning record of zero cases won and one case lost. The case lost appears to stem from a lack of compliance with established regulations concerning transparency in communication, particularly about legally required information. This points to a possible negligence in adhering to regulatory standards, which can invoke caution among potential buyers.

Patterns in Won Cases

Given that there are no cases won, it is difficult to identify any positive patterns or common factors in cases won, as the singular outcome reflects poorly on the builder’s reputation for adhering to necessary laws.

Conclusion

Overall, the assessment of Shri Abjibapa Infa suggests a builder struggling to maintain a clean slate in terms of legal compliance. With a history of losing cases and facing penalties, prospective homebuyers may want to proceed with caution when considering a purchase from this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before making any commitments, ensure to conduct comprehensive research on the builder’s track record, focusing on any legal disputes and resolutions.
2. Ask for Documentation: Ensure that all necessary documents, especially those pertaining to RERA compliance, are provided and reviewed.
3. Seek Reviews: Look for testimonials or reviews from previous buyers regarding their experiences with the builder and their projects.
4. Consult with Professionals: Consider hiring a legal advisor or a real estate expert who can offer industry insights and guidance relevant to your purchase.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Look for Credibility: Choose builders with a proven track record of successful projects and positive feedback from clients.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: Ensure the builder has the financial backing to complete the project safely and on time.
• Assess Quality of Work: Visit completed projects or request a tour to evaluate the quality of materials and construction.

In conclusion, the story of Shri Abjibapa Infa serves as a pertinent reminder of the importance of diligence and careful consideration in the journey to homeownership.

Analysis of the cases filed against builder Shri Abjibapa Infa, which it lost, reveals several key themes across the various disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory non-compliance and penalties imposed for project delays.

In terms of regulatory non-compliance, the most notable case involved the builder's violation of the Gujrera circular no. 18. The respondent claimed that the font size of the RERA registration number and website address was smaller than the contact/address of the promoter, which is a stipulated requirement. This highlights a pattern where builders may face legal challenges due to insufficient adherence to regulatory guidelines, which raises concerns about their operational integrity.

The common reasons people brought cases to court against this builder primarily revolved around regulatory violations and the resulting penalties. There was a notable absence of other types of disputes, such as those related to delayed possession or land classification. This suggests that the builder's litigation triggers were predominantly related to their failure to align with legal requirements rather than issues related to project delivery or customer satisfaction.

Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that the builder lost due to a clear non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements. In the cited case, the builder was found guilty of violating the aforementioned circular and was penalized accordingly. This underscores the importance of transparency and compliance in the real estate sector, as failure to uphold these standards can lead to legal repercussions and financial penalties.