|
6-87.
6-87.
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant, Shri Pradeep Yedi, sought a refund…
The applicant, Shri Pradeep Yedi, sought a refund of the amount paid for a flat in the 'Swastik Paras Enclave Phase-4' project developed by M/s Shri Adinath Developers. The authority directed the applicant to pay at least Rs. 5.30 lakh to the promoter and then pay installments regularly according to actual progress.
|
["Refund of amount …
["Refund of amount paid for flat", "Payment of installments"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that he had paid Rs. 9,49,587 for a flat in the 'Swastik Paras Enclave Phase-4' project developed by M/s Shri Adinath Developers and sought a refund of the amount paid with interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the construction work was continuing and more than 80% work had been done. They stated that the applicant had not paid any amount after the signing of the new contract.", "final_verdict": "The authority directed the applicant to pay at least Rs. 5.30 lakh to the promoter and then pay installments regularly according to actual progress.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Pradeep Yedi
Shri Pradeep Yedi
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/151351331535.pdf
|
|
4-8-353 and 4-8-355
4-8-353 and 4-8-355
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicants, Shri Subhash Pandey and Smt. Shak…
The applicants, Shri Subhash Pandey and Smt. Shakuntala Pandey, filed a case against M/s Shri Adinath Developers for delay in possession of their flat and sought compensation. The parties reached an agreement and the case was resolved after the execution of the sale deed.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that …
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that the respondent delayed the possession of their flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought time to complete the project.", "final_verdict": "The parties reached an agreement and the case was resolved after the execution of the sale deed. The applicants were given possession of their flat and the respondent paid the compensation as per the agreement.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Smt. Shakuntala Pan…
Smt. Shakuntala Pandey
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/555552555555.pdf
|
|
4-87?|-49-0654
4-87?|-49-0654
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not providing possession of a flat within the stipulated period. The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 8,45,928 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. from the date of payment till the date of payment.
|
["Non-provision of …
["Non-provision of possession", "Interest payment"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not provide possession of the flat within the stipulated period and sought refund of the consideration amount with interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant had not paid the installments within the stipulated period and sought payment of interest at the rate of 24% p.a.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 8,45,928 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. from the date of payment till the date of payment.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Ajit Kumar Raj…
Shri Ajit Kumar Rajput
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/828568152888.pdf
|
|
H |4-8?|--49--4468
H |4-8?|--49--4468
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in granting possession of a flat and compensation. The Adjudicating Officer passed an order directing the non-applicant to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 4,000/- per month for the period of delay.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed the possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought to be exempt from paying compensation.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer directed the non-applicant to pay compensation at the rate of Rs. 4,000/- per month for the period of delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Gulchand Harode
Shri Gulchand Harode
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/926106001666.pdf
|
|
4-87?--49--0706
4-87?--49--0706
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not completing the construction work of a flat and not refunding the amount paid. The adjudicating officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the amount paid with interest and compensation for mental distress and other expenses.
|
["Non-completion of…
["Non-completion of construction work", "Non-refund of amount paid"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that he paid Rs. 2,76,000/- for a flat, but the non-applicant did not complete the construction work and did not refund the amount paid.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant did not file any response.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer directed the non-applicant to pay the amount paid with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation for mental distress and other expenses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Amit Kumar Sha…
Shri Amit Kumar Sharma
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/459976442925.pdf
|
|
4-82.-24-0009
4-82.-24-0009
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant, Smt. Sarika Pal and Mr. Deepak Pal…
The applicant, Smt. Sarika Pal and Mr. Deepak Pal, sought compensation for delay in construction of a flat and non-provision of possession. The authority ordered payment of compensation, interest, and costs.
|
["Delay in construc…
["Delay in construction", "Non-provision of possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed compe…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed compensation for delay in construction of the flat and non-provision of possession.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that the applicants had cancelled the agreement and were not entitled to compensation.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered payment of compensation, interest, and costs to the applicants.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Mr. Deepak Pal
Mr. Deepak Pal
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/118112666872.pdf
|
|
Case Command: -82-2…
Case Command: -82-22-0464
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant sought compensation for not receivi…
The applicant sought compensation for not receiving possession of a flat and not getting a refund of the advance amount paid. The authority partly accepted the complaint and ordered the non-applicant to pay the refund with interest and compensation for mental injury.
|
["Refund of advance…
["Refund of advance amount", "Compensation for not receiving possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that h…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that he paid an advance amount of Rs. 9,00,225/- and did not receive possession of the flat within the stipulated time. He sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that the applicant did not pay the amount as per the terms of the contract and that the project was still under construction.", "final_verdict": "The authority partly accepted the complaint and ordered the respondent to pay the refund with interest and compensation for mental injury.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Gaurav Chaturvedi
Gaurav Chaturvedi
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/188527188666.pdf
|
|
4-870-48-4409
4-870-48-4409
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant, Ms. Sangeeta Thakur, filed a compl…
The applicant, Ms. Sangeeta Thakur, filed a complaint against M/s Shri Adinath Developers for compensation for the contravention of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2046. The Adjudicating Officer ordered the non-applicant to pay an amount of Rs. 5,64,000/- plus interest and compensation.
|
["Real Estate", "Co…
["Real Estate", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed compen…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed compensation for the contravention of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2046.", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that they had constructed the flat and taken possession of it, and that the applicant had paid the amount of Rs. 5,64,000/-.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer ordered the non-applicant to pay an amount of Rs. 5,64,000/- plus interest and compensation.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Ms. Sangeeta Thakur
Ms. Sangeeta Thakur
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/741146711661.pdf
|
|
4-87 ,--47-0679
4-87 ,--47-0679
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not paying the remaining consideration amount along with interest and compensation. The adjudicating officer passed an order in favor of the applicant.
|
["Non-payment of co…
["Non-payment of consideration amount", "Interest and compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not pay the remaining consideration amount along with interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant did not respond to the complaint.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the principal amount of Rs. 4,40,000/- and interest at the rate of 7% per annum.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Shailendra Sin…
Shri Shailendra Singh Baghelwal
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/923292555921.pdf
|
|
4-80, -48--4070
4-80, -48--4070
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant, Smt. Rashmi Naik, filed a complain…
The applicant, Smt. Rashmi Naik, filed a complaint against Shri Adinath Developers and Sri Balaji Infrastructures for not constructing her flat and not providing possession. The Adjudicating Officer passed an order directing the non-applicants to pay the applicant the principal amount of Rs. 4,61,100 and interest at the rate of 8% per annum.
|
["Non-construction …
["Non-construction of flat", "Non-provision of possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicants did not construct her flat and did not provide possession despite receiving the full payment.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicants claimed that they had constructed the flat and were ready to provide possession, but the applicant was not cooperating.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer directed the non-applicants to pay the applicant the principal amount of Rs. 4,61,100 and interest at the rate of 8% per annum.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Smt. Rashmi Naik
Smt. Rashmi Naik
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/191616619195.pdf
|
|
4-87-49-0439
4-87-49-0439
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicants filed a complaint against the non-…
The applicants filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not refunding the amount paid for a cancelled booking. The Adjudicating Officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest and compensation.
|
["Refund of amount"…
["Refund of amount", "Interest and compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that …
{"appellant_claim": "The applicants claimed that they paid Rs. 8,90,000 for a booking, but the non-applicant did not refund the amount after cancellation.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that they had paid Rs. 4,26,000 to the applicants, but the applicants had not paid the amount late.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount of Rs. 22,223 with interest at the rate of 8% per annum from 04.04.2045 till the date of receipt of the amount.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Mrs. Aarti Saini
Mrs. Aarti Saini
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/166356371751.pdf
|
|
Krimank: . 4-82. -4…
Krimank: . 4-82. -49--023
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat. The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed the possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought to justify the same.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant at the rate of Rs. 5,000 per month from 04.04.2048 to 34.07.2049, and Rs. 7,000 per month from 01.04.2020 to 31.12.2049.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Santosh Raghuvanshi
Santosh Raghuvanshi
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/366855668167.pdf
|
|
[4-87[--49--0049
[4-87[--49--0049
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat. The authority directed the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession within a stipulated period and pay compensation for the delay.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation for delay"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed the possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought time to complete the construction work.", "final_verdict": "The authority directed the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession within a stipulated period and pay compensation for the delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Santosh Raghuvanshi
Santosh Raghuvanshi
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/886661686166.pdf
|
|
4-82[--49--0082
4-82[--49--0082
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat. The Authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed the possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to various reasons, including financial management problems and non-payment of wages by customers.", "final_verdict": "The Authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per month till the date of grant of possession.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri C.P.
Shri C.P.
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/758616166756.pdf
|
|
[4-82]-49--0280
[4-82]-49--0280
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant complained about delay in possessio…
The applicant complained about delay in possession of a flat by the non-applicant. The Authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to various reasons, including the applicant's failure to make payments on time.", "final_verdict": "The Authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant at the rate of Rs. 3,500/- per month.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Prakash Srivas…
Shri Prakash Srivastava
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/777676665700.pdf
|
|
4-82. -19--0424
4-82. -19--0424
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat. The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and provide possession within a stipulated period.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought time to complete the construction work.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and provide possession within a stipulated period. The applicant was awarded compensation for the delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Ashutosh Gupta
Shri Ashutosh Gupta
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/586687686716.pdf
|
|
[1-87-48-4850
[1-87-48-4850
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat and non-construction of the building. The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Non-construction of building"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed the possession of the flat and did not construct the building as per the agreement.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that they were working hard to complete the construction.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant at the rate of Rs. 3,000/- per month.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Yogendra Soni
Shri Yogendra Soni
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/172295601650.pdf
|
|
4-82 --18--4659
4-82 --18--4659
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in completion of the construction work and non-grant of possession of the cell. The Adjudicating Officer passed an order directing the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession of the cell within a stipulated period.
|
["Delay in completi…
["Delay in completion of construction work", "Non-grant of possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed the completion of the construction work and had not granted possession of the cell within the stipulated period.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that they had made efforts to complete the construction work as soon as possible.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer directed the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession of the cell within a stipulated period.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Umesh Kumar Sh…
Shri Umesh Kumar Shukla
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/662866851378.pdf
|
|
H |4-8?|-48-4484
H |4-8?|-48-4484
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in completion of the project and non-grant of possession. The Authority passed an order directing the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession within a stipulated period.
|
["Delay in completi…
["Delay in completion of project", "Non-grant of possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed the completion of the project and had not granted possession of the cell within the stipulated period.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to various reasons, including financial difficulties and poor booking situation in the market.", "final_verdict": "The Authority directed the non-applicant to complete the construction work and grant possession within a stipulated period. The non-applicant was also directed to pay compensation to the applicant for the delay.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Vikas Nagle
Shri Vikas Nagle
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/858685595177.pdf
|
|
4-87? -49-0083
4-87? -49-0083
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat. The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay compensation for the delay and to complete the construction work by December 2049.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant delayed the possession of the flat and sought compensation for the delay.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought to justify the delay.", "final_verdict": "The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay compensation to the applicant for the delay and to complete the construction work by December 2049.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Syed Imran Ali
Shri Syed Imran Ali
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/333558153563.pdf
|
|
4-87?|-48-4303
4-87?|-48-4303
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant, Smt. Rampyari Soni, filed a compla…
The applicant, Smt. Rampyari Soni, filed a complaint against M/s Shri Adinath Developers for delay in possession of a flat. The Adjudicating Officer passed an order directing the developer to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the developer delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The developer claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and sought time to complete the construction work.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer directed the developer to complete the construction work within a stipulated period and pay compensation to the applicant.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Smt. Rampyari Soni
Smt. Rampyari Soni
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/896959661655.pdf
|
|
H |4-8?|-48-0936
H |4-8?|-48-0936
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat and sought compensation. The adjudicating officer passed an order directing the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed possession of the flat and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to various reasons including financial difficulties and sought to justify the delay.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer directed the non-applicant to complete the construction work and pay compensation to the applicant at the rate of Rs. 3,000 per month.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Awadhesh Kumar…
Shri Awadhesh Kumar Pandey
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/552885255595.pdf
|
|
4-87. -48-4342
4-87. -48-4342
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant paid Rs. 6,47,750 to the non-applic…
The applicant paid Rs. 6,47,750 to the non-applicant for a flat, but the non-applicant failed to deliver possession. The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest and compensation to the applicant.
|
["Non-delivery of p…
["Non-delivery of possession", "Interest and compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant failed to deliver possession of the flat and sought interest and compensation.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant failed to pay the monthly installments and sought penalty.", "final_verdict": "The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest and compensation to the applicant.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Vaibhav Katarw…
Shri Vaibhav Katarwar
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/722617225111.pdf
|
|
4-87. -49-0284
4-87. -49-0284
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for delay in possession of a flat and non-performance of work. The authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 3,89,789/- with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation for mental distress and other expenses.
|
["Delay in possessi…
["Delay in possession", "Non-performance of work"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant had delayed possession of the flat and had not performed the work as per the agreement.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay was due to unforeseen circumstances and that the applicant had not paid the dues on time.", "final_verdict": "The authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 3,89,789/- with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation for mental distress and other expenses.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Anurag Khare
Shri Anurag Khare
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/157172676169.pdf
|
|
4-87. -49--0328
4-87. -49--0328
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not refunding the amount paid for a flat. The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest at the rate of 8% per annum.
|
["Refund of amount …
["Refund of amount paid for flat", "Interest at the rate of 8% per annum"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not refund the amount paid for a flat and sought refund of the amount with interest.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant did not start the construction work and therefore the refund was not made.", "final_verdict": "The Authority ordered the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest at the rate of 8% per annum.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Mahesh Chandra
Shri Mahesh Chandra
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/917744712162.pdf
|
|
4-87. -48-4444
4-87. -48-4444
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not granting possession of a flat within the stipulated period. The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 3,70,642 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation for mental distress.
|
["Non-grant of poss…
["Non-grant of possession", "Interest and compensation"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not grant possession of the flat within the stipulated period and sought compensation for the same.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant had not paid the remaining amount as per the agreement and therefore, the possession was not granted.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 3,70,642 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation for mental distress.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Applicant
Applicant
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/165655265210.pdf
|
|
4-87. -48-4352
4-87. -48-4352
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not completing the construction work as per the terms of the contract. The Adjudicating Officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest and compensation.
|
["Non-completion of…
["Non-completion of construction work", "Delay in possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not complete the construction work as per the terms of the contract, resulting in financial loss and delay in possession.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant was not cooperating in the completion of the work.", "final_verdict": "The Adjudicating Officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the amount with interest and compensation.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Ms. Laxmi Maurya
Ms. Laxmi Maurya
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/251565154067.pdf
|
|
H |4-87. --48-4354
H |4-87. --48-4354
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not completing the project and not providing possession of the flat. The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 5,52,846 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation of Rs. 40,000.
|
["Non-completion of…
["Non-completion of project", "Non-provision of possession"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not complete the project and did not provide possession of the flat despite receiving the full payment.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the delay in completion of the project was due to unforeseen circumstances and that the applicant was not entitled to compensation.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer ordered the non-applicant to pay the applicant Rs. 5,52,846 with interest at the rate of 8% p.a. and compensation of Rs. 40,000.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Pradeep Vishwa…
Shri Pradeep Vishwakarma
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/610625632245.pdf
|
|
4-87--49--0374
4-87--49--0374
|
Madhya Pradesh
Madhya Pradesh
|
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-a…
The applicant filed a complaint against the non-applicant for not starting the construction work despite receiving the consideration amount. The adjudicating officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the balance amount with interest and compensation for mental distress.
|
["Non-performance o…
["Non-performance of work", "Delay in construction"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t…
{"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that the non-applicant did not start the construction work despite receiving the consideration amount, and sought compensation for mental distress and other expenses.", "respondent_claim": "The non-applicant claimed that the applicant had not produced any document or proof to show that they had taken a loan from the bank for the said amount.", "final_verdict": "The adjudicating officer passed an order in favor of the applicant, directing the non-applicant to pay the balance amount with interest and compensation for mental distress.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Shri Sandeep Bansal
Shri Sandeep Bansal
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/115751610121.pdf
|
|
CMP/Ahmedabad/22012…
CMP/Ahmedabad/220127/000026
|
Gujarat
Gujarat
|
The complainants, Akshat Singh Jitendra Singh Ksh…
The complainants, Akshat Singh Jitendra Singh Kshatriya and Babu Rameshbhai Panara, filed complaints against Shri Chandrakant Himmatlal Shah and Shri Adinath Developers for not providing lift facility and common facilities in their flats despite paying the full price.
|
["Lift facility", "…
["Lift facility", "Common facilities"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed tha…
{"appellant_claim": "The complainants claimed that despite paying the full price, the respondents did not provide lift facility and common facilities in their flats.", "respondent_claim": "The respondents claimed that they would provide the facilities by the validity date of the project on 31/01/2024.", "final_verdict": "The respondents were ordered to provide lift facility and water within 3 months from the receipt of the copy of the orders, and the remaining facilities by the date of validity of the project on 31/01/2024.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
Babu Rameshbhai Pan…
Babu Rameshbhai Panara
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1o3OlBFgA5OoYPiEJCuQFdLhzmqtCKnjj
|
|
61/8[02/5800//3T0th…
61/8[02/5800//3T0th(3/200124/0019
|
Gujarat
Gujarat
|
The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority impo…
The Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on Adinath Developers for not submitting the quarterly report on time. The authority ordered the promoter to pay the penalty personally.
|
["Non-submission of…
["Non-submission of quarterly report", "Fine imposed"]
|
{"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The …
{"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "The respondent claimed that they had not submitted the quarterly report on time due to unforeseen circumstances.", "final_verdict": "The authority imposed a fine of Rs. 25,000 on the respondent for not submitting the quarterly report on time.", "in_favor_of_respondent": "no"}
|
|
Shri Adinath Develo…
Shri Adinath Developers
|
https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1LPGICDMYCbEfPZyPqShNwI3U928xjpaS
|
