| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the real estate sector, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth and hassle-free home buying experience. Shri Adinath Developers, operating mainly in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, recently came under the spotlight due to a concerning track record. This blog delves into the builder's performance, particularly focusing on the legal cases filed against them and their outcomes.
Overview of Builder Performance
Shri Adinath Developers has faced a total of 44 complaints, with a striking record of losing all cases (0 wins). The outcomes of these legal battles reflect various issues concerning project delays, failure to provide facilities, and customer dissatisfaction.
Legal Case Analysis
Common Patterns in Lost Cases
Among the complaints filed against Shri Adinath Developers, there are several recurring themes:
- Failure to Provide Promised Facilities: Many complainants have raised issues regarding the non-provision of lift facilities and other common amenities despite full payment. The builder …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Adinath Developers, where the builder lost, reveals significant insights into the common themes and disputes associated with their projects.
The cases can be broadly categorized into several types, including delayed possession claims, failure to provide promised facilities, compensation for mental distress and financial loss, refund disputes, and non-compliance with contractual obligations.
Delayed possession claims were among the most frequent, with multiple complainants alleging that the builder had failed to deliver possession of their flats within the stipulated time. This was often attributed to unforeseen circumstances, which is a common defense in real estate disputes. However, the adjudicating bodies consistently ruled in favor of the applicants, indicating a degree of disfavor towards the builder's reliability in meeting timelines.
The failure to provide promised facilities was another recurring theme. Complainants often cited that despite paying in full for their flats, the builder …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!