SHRI ADITYA INFA

Understanding Shri Aditya Infa's Performance in the Real Estate Arena

Shri Aditya Infa, a builder primarily focused on projects in Gujarat. While the builder has shown promise in terms of customer satisfaction, a closer look into their legal history reveals important insights for potential buyers.

Builder's Legal Record Overview

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0

Shri Aditya Infa has filed only one case, which they successfully navigated, showcasing their efficiency in handling disputes and an overall positive track record against complaints. However, it’s essential to delve deeper into this single case, where the details of the dispute lie.

Detailed Legal Case Summary

The following summarizes a case where Shri Aditya Infa had to address complaints about parking allocations:

• Appellant Claim: The complainant claimed that the promoter allocated the parking space for their flat to another allottee and sought an order to change the allocation.
• Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the project work was completed, and possession of the common area, including parking, had been handed over to the society. Hence, any changes concerning parking allocation needed to be addressed within the society itself rather than with the builder.
• Final Verdict: The complaint was dismissed by the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority, with no liability found on the part of the builder to change the parking allocation.

Pattern Analysis

Upon analyzing the case, a few patterns emerge:

1. Common Factors in Lost Cases:
   - Upon investigation, the single case reflects a scenario where the complainant's claim entailed property management issues (parking allocation) rather than construction-related matters. This suggests that complaints regarding property usage and common area management fall outside the pure construction-related issues typically handled under builder obligations.
2. Common Factors in Won Cases:
   - The builder’s successful defense in this instance indicates a possible strength in their operational and project management processes, particularly concerning the completion and handoff of common areas to societies. It also illustrates the importance of understanding society norms and regulations for buyers post-purchase.

Conclusion: Overall Assessment of Shri Aditya Infa

Shri Aditya Infa, with a decent track record, has navigated a legal challenge successfully. The dismissal of their complaint suggests an organization that is compliant and responsive to regulations; however, the singularity of the legal action also reminds buyers to consider potential issues that could arise after possession, especially regarding amenities and common area management.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Shri Aditya Infa

1. Understand Property Management: Given that a recent complaint dealt with parking allocations, inquire about the specifics of how these matters are managed once the property is handed over.
2. Research Project Reviews: Seek feedback from current residents in the builder's completed projects to get a sense of their experiences, particularly regarding communal aspects.
3. Review Society Guidelines: Familiarize yourself with the homeowner’s association or society regulations as they can significantly impact your living experience.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Verify Track Records: Investigate past legal battles and complaints against builders to gather insights on customer satisfaction.
• Look for Transparency: A builder's willingness to openly discuss their projects and share feedback from previous clients is a positive indicator.
• Seek Full Information: Ask about any ongoing or completed projects, including legal status, to ensure you're making an informed purchase.

In conclusion, while Shri Aditya Infa presents a promising option in Gujarat, being proactive in gathering information and understanding the implications of living within a homeowners' society can further enhance your buying experience.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shri Aditya Infa, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes primarily revolved around a few key themes, notably 'Disputes over Parking Allocations', where buyers raised issues regarding the allocation of parking spaces. 'Claims of Project Completion' highlighted instances where buyers contested the completion status of various aspects of the project. Furthermore, 'Issues with Society Responsibilities' emerged as buyers sought recourse regarding matters that ideally fell under the purview of the housing society after possession had been transferred.

Many of these cases were brought to court by buyers seeking to address perceived injustices, such as claims for changed parking allocations or dissatisfaction over the acknowledgment of completed projects. A common thread among these cases is that buyers often expressed their discontent, leading to legal disputes over fairly standard real estate practices. The complaints typically stemmed from misunderstandings regarding the builder's obligations once the project had transitioned to the society.

The reasons why Shri Aditya Infa was able to win these cases often related to the opposing party's presentation of inadequate evidence. Cases were dismissed, as the builder's defense effectively underscored that the project work had been duly completed, and hence the responsibility of certain issues lay with the society, rather than the builder. This highlights a trend where buyers, at times, made exaggerated or unfounded claims, leading to the dismissal of the complaints against the builder.

This analysis significantly reflects on the reputation of the builder within the broader real estate market. It suggests that while there are certainly genuine disputes, there are also instances where buyers may overreach or misinterpret contractual obligations. Shri Aditya Infa's ability to withstand these challenges implies a robust understanding of regulations and project management, further establishing their reliability in the industry.

In conclusion, potential buyers are encouraged to approach claims and disputes with caution. While many builders face legitimate concerns from buyers, the case outcomes reveal that builders like Shri Aditya Infa can successfully defend against false accusations. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for buyers to base their decisions on thorough due diligence and reliable information regarding a builder's track record and reputation.