SHRI CHOGALA DEVELOPERS

Introduction

When it comes to real estate investments, due diligence is essential. Buyers must be aware of a builder's track record, especially when it comes to legal compliance and customer satisfaction. In this post, we delve into the performance and history of Shri Chogala Developers based on available data.

Overview of Shri Chogala Developers

Shri Chogala Developers is a builder located in Gujarat, with a notable record of two legal complaints filed against them. Unfortunately, their history indicates that they have not won any cases and have lost both.

Legal Case Details

The two cases involved serious compliance issues:

1. First Case: The appellant (builder) argued that they were adhering to all regulations set forth, claiming that the fine imposed was unjustified. However, the authority disagreed, finding that the builder had not complied with the necessary regulations. Consequently, a fine of Rs. 10,000 was levied against them.
2. Second Case: In the second case, the builder claimed they had submitted a tri-monthly report on time; however, this report was not available on the RERA portal. The respondent contended that the builder had indeed not met the requirements as outlined by the RERA Act. The verdict in this case favored the respondent, with another fine of Rs. 10,000 imposed on Shri Chogala Developers.

Patterns in Cases Lost

From the summary above, it can be noted that:

• Non-compliance: A recurring theme is the non-compliance with regulatory requirements. In both instances, the regulatory body upheld its stance that Shri Chogala Developers failed to follow the prescribed rules, leading to fines.
• Failure in Documentation: The builder's inability to provide necessary documentation, as evidenced by the tri-monthly report incident, highlights potential inefficiencies in their operations or oversight.

Cases Won

Interestingly, there are no records of the builder winning any cases, indicating a problematic history in terms of legal disputes. This could point to systemic issues regarding adherence to regulatory frameworks or mismanagement in project execution.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, it is evident that prospective buyers should approach Shri Chogala Developers with caution. The builder's record of legal challenges and losses raises concerns about their compliance with industry standards and regulations.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Before making a purchase, ensure that you research the builder's reputation thoroughly, especially in terms of compliance with regulations.
2. Request Documentation: Always ask for evidence of compliance, such as RERA registrations and necessary approvals.
3. Consider Legal History: Take note of the builder’s legal history, including any complaints or cases filed against them.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Check Reviews: Look for online reviews or testimonials from previous buyers.
• Assess Completed Projects: Evaluate the quality and timeliness of the builder's completed projects.
• Meet with Current Residents: If possible, speak with residents of buildings developed by the builder to gauge their experience.

In summary, while Shri Chogala Developers may have aspirations for growth within the Gujarat real estate market, their current legal standings warrant a careful assessment by potential buyers.

The analysis of the cases filed by Shri Chogala Developers, which it lost, revealed significant insights into the recurring issues this builder faces in the realm of real estate compliance and governance.

One prominent theme is Regulatory Non-compliance. In the cases reviewed, the builder was often found to be non-compliant with established regulations. For instance, in both case summaries, the authorities upheld findings that the builder failed to meet various regulatory requirements, leading to imposed fines. This pattern suggests that the builder may not have a robust internal compliance mechanism in place to adhere to regulations set forth by local governing bodies.

Another critical theme identified is Penalties and Fines. The builder seems to frequently contest financial penalties imposed upon them, arguing that such fines are unjustified. However, the consistent outcome of these cases indicates that the authorities validate the fines as justified, often tied to the builder's regulatory lapses. This pattern may reflect deeper operational inefficiencies within the builder's management, where compliance lapses can lead to financial repercussions.

Lastly, there were several Disputes over Report Submission. The builder claimed to have met obligations such as timely report submissions, disputing claims made by regulatory bodies. However, the outcome of these disputes consistently reaffirmed that the builder failed to submit necessary documentation as required. This recurring issue highlights potential deficiencies in record-keeping or communication systems that may be used by the builder.

Overall, the common reasons the builder brought cases to court include contesting penalties related to non-compliance and disputing project delays attributed to perceived oversights by regulatory bodies. However, the builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence supporting their claims, a demonstrated history of non-compliance with legal standards, and an apparent misunderstanding or failure to adhere to reporting obligations. This data serves as a cautionary insight for potential buyers considering engaging with Shri Chogala Developers, as the outcomes of these cases illustrate a consistent pattern of challenges faced by the builder in fulfilling their obligations within the real estate landscape.