Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shri Ganesh Developers which they lost reveals several key insights into the builder's challenges and the recurring themes in their disputes.

The cases can be grouped into three main categories: Non-compliance with RERA Regulations, Penalties for Late Filings, and Disputes over Report Submissions.

1. 1. Non-compliance with RERA Regulations: This theme highlights the builder’s struggles to adhere to the requirements established by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).

The builder faced penalties due to not filing essential documents, such as final reports of project completion, on time. This failure not only resulted in financial consequences but also raised questions about the builder's commitment to regulatory compliance.

2. 2. Penalties for Late Filings: Several cases emphasize the consequences of late submissions of reports. The builder asserted that they had submitted their reports timely, but regulatory authorities disputed these claims.

The outcomes of these cases show a clear trend: the authority imposes fines when builders fail to demonstrate compliance with filing protocols, leading to additional financial liability for the builder.

3. 3. Disputes over Report Submissions: The cases included a focus on the timely delivery of required documentation. The builder's insistence on preparation and submission of reports contrasts with the authority’s position that these reports were either incomplete or submitted late.

A common pattern observed in these legal disputes is the builder’s inclination to contest penalties and argue against claims of non-compliance primarily directed at project reporting.

However, despite these arguments, the outcomes show that the builder often lacked sufficient evidence to support their claims or failed to meet RERA’s stipulated requirements.

Moreover, the reasons behind the builder’s loss often stem from their inability to sufficiently demonstrate compliance with regulatory guidelines or misunderstanding of their obligations.

Without clear documentation or adherence to filing timelines, the builders find themselves at a disadvantage in legal disputes.

Overall, these cases serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers, highlighting the importance of ensuring that builders adhere to regulatory standards and the potential risks associated with non-compliance.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shri Ganesh Developers, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily center around regulatory compliance issues, particularly concerning the registration of projects with GUJRERA, and the associated penalties due to delays in this registration process.

One notable case brought against the builder involved claims that the project was not registered with GUJRERA within the stipulated time frame. This led to an imposition of a penalty; however, the builder successfully defended against more severe accusations thanks to their legal standing and adherence to other regulatory obligations.

The reasons for these legal challenges largely stem from disputes over project delays, compliance with municipal orders, and accusations related to regulatory non-compliance. In most cases, buyers or regulatory bodies contested penalties, leading to legal action. A pattern can be seen here that many of these cases arise due to misunderstandings or disputes over compliance with legal standards and project timelines.

The common reasons attributed to the builder's ability to win these cases include insufficient evidence presented by the opposing parties, issues relating to non-compliance with legal requirements on their end, or a lack of following interim directions. These components emphasize the builder's effective defense mechanisms against claims that could be overblown, or in some cases, unfounded.

This analysis sheds light on the builder’s reputation within the wider real estate market. It indicates that buyers may sometimes resort to unfounded accusations, resulting in unnecessary legal confrontations. Shri Ganesh Developers appears to have a solid track record for defending their interests against exaggerated or incorrect claims from buyers or regulatory bodies, establishing their robustness in managing disputes effectively.

In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to make informed decisions when considering real estate investments. Although legitimate disputes exist within the market, the outcome of these legal cases illustrates that builders like Shri Ganesh Developers can often successfully defend themselves against unjust claims. Thus, it is crucial for buyers to analyze claims carefully and seek reliable information that can provide a clearer perspective on a builder's reputation.