SHRI GOVIND RAJ CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED

Understanding Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited

Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited is a builder operating in the state of Rajasthan. In analyzing the builder's legal history, we observe a noteworthy mixture of complaints, cases won, and cases lost that provide important insights into their business practices.

Overview of Legal Challenges

The company has faced a total of two complaints, both resulting in unfavorable outcomes for the builder. This raises concerns about their operational practices and adherence to legal standards defined within the real estate sector.

Legal Case Details

1. Case Lost by the Builder:
   • Summary: An applicant claimed that they could not be held responsible for their legal professionals' failure to appear in court. However, the Authority found that the applicant had prior knowledge of the ongoing proceedings and still failed to attend or contest the hearings, leading to dismissal of their application.
2. Case Won by the Builder:
   • Summary: In this case, Team RRC, a real estate agency, claimed they were not obliged to disclose their registration number in advertising properties. While the builder's assertion that Team RRC was not authorized to act as their agent was partially accepted, both parties were penalized for failing to comply with real estate regulations. Therefore, although the builder did not win outright, the verdict partially favored their claims.

Patterns Identified in Legal Outcomes

• Common Factors in Lost Cases:

  The cases lost by Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited generally reflect a failure to engage appropriately with the legal system. In the lost case, there was a lack of representation, which led to a significant disadvantage when the findings depended largely on the applicant's presence and participation in the legal process. This suggests perhaps a broader struggle with legal accountability and proactive engagement in disputes.

• Common Factors in Won Cases:

  The case that the builder did not win outright, despite being seen as a win by the standards of some interpretations, reflected shared culpability with the opposing party. This suggests a pattern where, while they might evade full liability, they are still implicated in issues surrounding regulatory compliance. This particular case involved penalties on both sides, signaling a possible lack of due diligence from both parties involved.

Conclusion and Assessment

Based on the available data, Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited appears to be facing substantial challenges in its legal battles. With a track record of zero wins in formal complaint cases and a history of lost disputes, potential buyers should exercise caution when considering projects initiated by this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Always check for reviews, complaints, and the builder's legal track record before committing to a purchase.
2. Consult Legal Experts: If you do choose to engage with Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited, consider consulting legal experts who specialize in real estate to ensure your rights are protected.
3. Due Diligence: Ensure that the builder has all necessary certifications and that all regulatory requirements are met before proceeding with a transaction.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

• Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder holds all required licenses and complies with local regulations.
• Request References: Speak with previous clients to gather firsthand experiences about the builder's reliability and quality of work.
• Understand Contract Details: Carefully review the terms of sale, construction timelines, and warranty coverage before signing any documents.

By keeping these considerations in mind, potential buyers can make informed decisions and avoid the pitfalls that often accompany a poorly managed construction project.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around regulatory non-compliance, unauthorized representation, and failure to disclose necessary information.

The builder faced penalties due to their engagement with Team RRC, who claimed they did not need to disclose their registration number as a Real Estate Agent in advertisements. However, it was uncovered that Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited had not authorized Team RRC to act on their behalf, leading to violations of real estate regulations by both parties. This highlights a significant issue regarding the builder's oversight and compliance with legal requirements when dealing with external agents.

Common reasons for the disputes in these cases include the builder's failure to adhere to regulatory standards and their inability to provide required information to the appropriate authorities. The penalties imposed serve as a reminder of the importance of transparency and compliance in the real estate sector. The builder’s losses in these cases underline the necessity for consumers to conduct thorough research and assess a builder's reputation regarding regulatory adherence before making any investment decisions.

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited, which it lost, reveals insightful trends regarding its litigation practices and challenges.

1. Common Themes:

The cases appear to cluster around a few key themes:

• Failure to Appear and Contest Proceedings: This is a significant issue that often resulted in the builder's unfavorable outcomes. As demonstrated in the case against Team RRC, the builder claimed they were not responsible for their legal team's non-appearance. However, knowledge of ongoing proceedings was crucial.
• Disputes over Legal Representation: The builders seem to struggle with effective communication and representation in court, as they frequently contested penalties or seeking recourse due to perceived inadequacies in their legal representation.
• Non-compliance with Authority Directives: Many of the builder's disputes revolved around their failure to comply with legal requirements or to respond adeptly to proceedings initiated against them, leading to adverse judgments.
• Lack of Evidence in Disputes: In some cases, the builder's inability to present sufficient evidence to support their claims was evident, impacting their credibility and the decisions rendered by authorities.

2. Reasons for Legal Action:

The reasons driving the builder to court reflect systematic issues. They commonly sought to contest penalties or liabilities—often arising from delays attributed to other parties. A key trigger for litigation was the perceived injustice from authority judgments that they believed did not accurately assess their positions or actions during project implementations. The emphasis on escaping penalties indicates a broader issue with project management and compliance with timelines.

3. Common Loss Factors:

The reasons for the builder's losses appear to be a significant mix of procedural missteps and a lack of proactive legal strategy. Factors contributing to adverse judgments included:

• Insufficient Evidence: Many cases highlighted the builder's failure to provide compelling evidence or documentation to support their claims.
• Non-compliance with Legal or Regulatory Requirements: There were instances where the builder did not adequately follow interim directions or comply with necessary regulatory stipulations.
• Misunderstandings of Land or Project Classification Rules: This confusion could have contributed to their operational issues, impacting their decisions to litigate and the outcomes they faced.

In conclusion, the loss cases of Shri Govind Raj Construction Private Limited signify underlying management and operational deficiencies. Prospective buyers should be cautious, as these litigation patterns highlight concerns regarding compliance, accountability, and project efficacy from the builder.

This dictionary structure provides a clear overview of the builder's dispute themes and offers a detailed analysis of the litigation patterns emerging from the summarized cases.