CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is a critical decision that can significantly impact your investment. One such builder in the Indian state of Chhattisgarh is Shri Krishna Colonizer. In this post, we will explore the builder's legal history, assess their reliability, and provide helpful tips for potential buyers.
Shri Krishna Colonizer has faced 6 legal complaints, and commendably, they have won all 6 cases without losing any. This notable record points towards a strong legal stance and a robust operational framework.
Interestingly, there are no documented cases that Shri Krishna Colonizer has lost. This impeccable record emphasizes their capacity to navigate legal challenges successfully—likely due to well-prepared submissions and perhaps, strong agreements in place regarding project layouts and facility use.
Based on the provided legal data, Shri Krishna Colonizer appears to be a reliable builder, particularly in managing disputes related to property access and facility usage. Winning all cases indicates an adeptness in legal matters, which may inspire greater confidence among potential buyers. However, it is essential for prospective homeowners to conduct comprehensive due diligence before finalizing any purchases.
In conclusion, while Shri Krishna Colonizer shows promise with its perfect track record in legal matters, prospective buyers should always prioritize due diligence and informed decision-making when investing in real estate.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Krishna Colonizer, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder encountered various recurring disputes primarily focused on access to project facilities, allegations of encroachment on land, and disagreements regarding land use and regulatory compliance. These disputes often highlight the complexities involved in real estate transactions, where misunderstandings can lead to significant legal challenges.
Grouped by theme, the cases predominantly revolve around 'Disputes over Facility Access.' In each of the analyzed cases, the applicant claimed that non-applicants (other party) were obstructing their use of project facilities, especially road access. This reflects the critical nature of access to infrastructure in real estate projects. Additionally, 'Encroachment Claims' emerged as a common thread, with the builder facing accusations of intruding upon others' land—a serious concern that can jeopardize property rights.
Moreover, disagreements linked to 'Disagreements over Land Use' often involved contentions over what was permitted as per town planning regulations. The builders often contested claims regarding 'Regulatory Non-compliance,' where opposing parties argued the builder failed to secure necessary approvals. The litigation appears to stem primarily from external factors or misunderstandings, rather than direct failures on the builder's part.
The reasons Shri Krishna Colonizer commonly brought these cases to court included contesting unjustified penalties imposed by regulatory bodies, disputing project delays attributed to issues beyond their control, and defending against accusations that were often based on unclear or misinterpreted legal frameworks. This demonstrates a pattern where the builder is often reactive to claims rather than being the initiator of conflict.
Winning these cases can be attributed to several factors. The builder often faced insufficient evidence from opposing parties, who failed to present strong justifications for their claims. Additionally, instances of non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements on part of the complainants were noted, as was the failure to adhere to established procedures. This highlights how the builder was capable of effectively defending itself, sometimes overcoming accusations that were unfounded or exaggerated.
This analysis of Shri Krishna Colonizer's legal battles sheds light on the builder's reputation within the real estate market. It is not uncommon for buyers to overstate claims against builders, which can lead to contentious lawsuits. The builder's strong track record of successfully defending against these claims suggests that buyers should exercise caution and diligence when forming opinions based solely on disputes.
In conclusion, potential buyers should recognize the significance of informed decision-making in the real estate market. While legitimate disputes do exist, this analysis reveals that builders like Shri Krishna Colonizer are often well-prepared to assert their rights and defend against unfair accusations. Therefore, prospective buyers are encouraged to seek reliable information and consider all facets before assessing a builder's reputation.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!