SHRI KRISHNA EMPOWERMENT

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a builder for your next home, it's crucial to thoroughly research their track record. In this post, we delve into the case of Shri Krishna Empowerment, a builder operating in Madhya Pradesh. With a concerning number of complaints and a lack of favorable outcomes in legal disputes, potential buyers should take caution when considering this builder.

Overview of Shri Krishna Empowerment

Shri Krishna Empowerment has faced a total of 4 complaints from customers, with no victories in any related legal cases. Each of the cases resulted in losses for the builder, painting a picture of a troubling pattern. Given the legal landscape surrounding this builder, it is vital for prospective customers to be well-informed before proceeding with any agreements.

Legal Case Details

1. The total number of cases filed against Shri Krishna Empowerment is 4, and in each instance, the builder lost. Here is a summary of these cases:
• Case 1: An applicant paid Rs. 84,000 for a flat, but construction work was never initiated. The builder had claimed they did not receive the payment. The verdict favored the applicant, awarding them compensation and interest.
• Case 2: After paying Rs. 3,42,000 for a flat that was not completed, the applicant sought a significant interest rate and compensation. The adjudicating officer again ruled in favor of the applicant, though the compensation awarded was lesser than sought.
• Case 3: In another instance, the builder faced penalties for failing to complete work on time, resulting in a substantial order for compensation and interest to the applicant.
• Case 4: With a payment of Rs. 4,50,000, the applicant claimed non-completion of construction, leading to a similar outcome where the builder was ordered to refund the amount with interest and additional compensation.

Patterns in Legal Cases

Common Factors in Lost Cases

• Non-Completion of Work: A prevalent theme appears where the builder failed to complete the construction of flats, leading many applicants to seek compensation.
• Delayed Construction: Many cases highlighted delays beyond the promised timeframes, resulting in financial claims from applicants.
• Disputed Payments: The builder consistently contested that payments had not been made in full, which may indicate mismanagement or communication issues with clients.

Common Factors in Won Cases

While there are no cases where the builder has won, it is important to present the details leading to their losses, as these cases imply a consistent trend of unfavorable outcomes. In every case, the decision favored the applicant due to failures attributed to the builder.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Shri Krishna Empowerment appears to be a potentially risky choice for homebuyers in Madhya Pradesh. With no wins against 4 lost cases, there is a clear indication of dissatisfaction among clients and failures within the company concerning project completion and customer service.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Extensively: Investigate any builder's history. Customer reviews, legal disputes, and outcomes are vital for making an informed decision.
2. Request Transparency: Set clear terms regarding construction timelines and payment structures, ideally documented in a contract.
3. Consult Legal Resources: Seek legal advice before making any commitments, especially if the builder has previously faced legal challenges.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Verify Credentials: Ensure the builder is properly licensed and has a reputable standing within the community.
• Demand References: Ask for references from previous clients and follow up on their experiences to gauge reliability.
• Review Contracts: Before signing, thoroughly read and understand all terms and conditions outlined in the contract, paying close attention to completion dates and refund clauses.

In conclusion, it is essential for prospective homebuyers to approach Shri Krishna Empowerment with caution and to consider the outlined risks associated with this builder.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Krishna Empowerment, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the complaints raised by the applicants. The primary disputes can be categorized into three main topics: Delayed Possession Claims, Disputes over Payment and Completion, and Compensation for Mental Distress and Delays.

The cases often revolved around the builder's failure to initiate or complete construction work on flats after receiving payments from the applicants. This led to multiple claims primarily classified as Delayed Possession Claims. Applicants sought compensation and interest for the delays, arguing that they had made substantial payments for flats that were supposed to be completed within a reasonable timeframe. For instance, in one case, the applicant paid Rs. 84,000, and in another, Rs. 3,42,000, yet the builder did not fulfill their commitments.

Disputes over Payment and Completion emerged as another significant theme. In these cases, the builder contested the claims by stating that applicants had not paid the full amount due. However, the adjudicating officer consistently ruled in favor of the applicants, indicating a failure on the builder's part to provide credible evidence of incomplete payments or to justify the delays in construction.

The builders were also held accountable for causing mental distress to the applicants due to their inability to deliver properties on time. Compensation for Mental Distress and Delays was a common verdict, with courts recognizing the emotional and psychological ramifications that buyers face when contracts are not honored.

A pattern emerges from these summaries: the builder’s litigation often stemmed from a combination of factors, including insufficient evidence to support their claims, a lack of compliance with payment agreements, and a failure to meet project timelines. The consistent ruling against the builder suggests systemic issues within their operational practices, resulting in repeated failures to fulfill contractual obligations and meet buyer expectations.