SHRI KUNJ RESIDENCY CO.OMP.YES. SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED

Understanding Shri Kunj Residency Co.Omp.Yes. Service Society Limited

Shri Kunj Residency Co.Omp.Yes. Service Society Limited, primarily operating in the state of Gujarat, has garnered attention within the real estate market. As potential homebuyers consider this builder for their property needs, it’s essential to evaluate their track record, especially in the realm of legal disputes.

Current Standing

The builder has been involved in a total of 1 complaint, resulting in 0 cases won and 1 case lost. This record indicates a concerning trend regarding customer satisfaction and the fulfillment of contractual obligations.

Legal Case Details

Case Analysis

1. Case Filed Against the Builder: The complainant alleged that the builder failed to provide multiple promised facilities as outlined in marketing materials. These included:
   • Parking shed
   • Annual expenditure report
   • Water connection
   In response, the builder contended that all promised facilities were delivered and argued that the complainant’s claims for additional facilities were unwarranted. However, the final verdict concluded that the builder was ordered to complete the parking shed and cover reasonable expenses incurred by the complainant.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

Cases Lost

The singular case lost by Shri Kunj Residency reveals a pattern where the builder may have failed to adequately address customer needs as outlined in marketing material. The claim that promised amenities were lacking points to potential issues in customer service or project delivery standards. This situation illustrates a critical area for improvement in how they meet their customers’ expectations.

Cases Won

In contrast, while the builder has indicated that they have successfully defended their position in other complaints, the details provided do not reflect any cases won by the builder related to customer claims. This lack of successful outcomes underlines the importance of buyer vigilance and highlights potential weaknesses in the builder’s operational practices.

Conclusion

Overall, Shri Kunj Residency Co.Omp.Yes. Service Society Limited shows a challenging legal record which may raise red flags for prospective buyers. The solitary case lost reflects a need for prospective homeowners to seriously consider the builder’s maintenance of contractual commitments and fulfillment of promises.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate not only the builder's history but also its reputation in the market.
2. Ask for References: Connecting with previous buyers can offer valuable insights into their experiences.
3. Request Detailed Documentation: Ensure that all promised amenities and conditions are clearly documented in the contract before signing.
4. Be Aware of Your Rights: Understand the legal recourse available should promises not be fulfilled.

General Tips When Choosing a Builder

• Always look for builders with a solid track record of delivering quality and fulfilling contracts.
• Check for any ongoing legal disputes or complaints against the builder.
• Consider the builder’s responsiveness to customer queries and its service level post-purchase.
• Pay attention to reviews on social media and dedicated real estate platforms.

By following these recommendations, buyers can better navigate the complexities of the real estate industry and make informed decisions regarding their future homes.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Kunj Residency Co. Op. Yes. Service Society Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The primary disputes can be categorized into two main topics: 'Failure to Deliver Promised Facilities' and 'Disputes Over Contractual Obligations'.

The cases often involved the builder's failure to provide facilities that were promised in the marketing materials, such as parking sheds, annual expenditure reports, and proper water connections. This suggests a systemic issue where the builder may have been over-promising while under-delivering, leading to significant dissatisfaction among buyers.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases included complaints filed by buyers who felt aggrieved by the lack of promised amenities. The builder's defense typically revolved around claims of having fulfilled their obligations, yet the outcomes reveal a different story. The authorities determined that the builder did indeed fail to meet the expectations set during the sales process, leading to legal consequences.

The builder's losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims of having provided the promised facilities was a critical reason. Moreover, the builder's failure to comply with the regulatory requirements regarding transparency and accountability in real estate dealings likely played a significant role in the verdicts.

The patterns emerging from these case summaries indicate a need for buyers to exercise caution when engaging with Shri Kunj Residency Co. Op. Yes. Service Society Limited. It is essential for prospective buyers to carefully review contract terms, assess the builder's reputation, and evaluate prior legal disputes before making a purchase.