SHRI SARTHI CORPORATION

Introduction

When it comes to choosing a builder for your dream home, understanding their track record is crucial. In this post, we will delve into the performance of Shri Sarthi Corporation, a builder operating in Gujarat, by examining their legal encounters and overall reputation based on the provided data.

Overview of Shri Sarthi Corporation

Shri Sarthi Corporation has registered only one complaint against them, and impressively, they have won that case, showcasing a resilient legal standing. The data indicates a solitary case against them, with no losses apart from the singular complaint they have faced.

Legal Case Details: A Closer Look

The legal case against Shri Sarthi Corporation entails the following details:

• Appellant Claim: The appellant claimed they submitted tri-monthly reports on time but did not receive the system-generated email confirming their submission.
• Respondent Claim: The builder argued that the appellant had not submitted the reports on time and failed to provide the necessary details.
• Final Verdict: The builder was fined Rs. 25,000 for their failure to submit required reports on time.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

The sole case that resulted in a loss for Shri Sarthi Corporation highlights a critical common factor: the failure to maintain timely submissions and proper documentation. The builder's inability to provide adequate proof of timely report submissions led to a fine, suggesting that operational shortcomings can significantly impact legal standings.

While Shri Sarthi Corporation has won their cases, the lack of data on specific won cases means we cannot derive direct patterns from multiple victories. Nonetheless, their successful defense indicates that they have the ability to challenge claims effectively, possibly due to proper legal strategies or sufficient documentation in various instances.

Conclusion: Assessing Shri Sarthi Corporation

Overall, based on the limited data available, Shri Sarthi Corporation appears to be a builder with a generally favorable track record in legal scenarios. Despite the existence of one formal complaint and a resultant fine, their overall case-winning status suggests competent handling of disputes. However, their experience with one lost case highlights the importance of impeccable documentation and operational compliance.

Tips for Potential Buyers Considering Shri Sarthi Corporation

1. Verify Documentation: Ensure that Shri Sarthi Corporation has a consistent and thorough documentation process, especially for submissions and reports related to your projects.
2. Seek Transparency: Inquire about their processes and how they handle project submissions to avoid future issues.
3. Assess Past Performance: Look into other projects completed by Shri Sarthi Corporation to gauge the quality and timeliness of their work.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Research Reputation: Always check for complaints, legal cases, and resolutions against builders before making your decision.
2. Communicate Clearly: Establish clear communication channels with the builder about project timelines and responsibilities.
3. Ask for References: Speak with previous clients to get insights into their experiences with the builder.
4. Review Contracts Carefully: Thoroughly read through all agreements and contracts to understand your rights and the builder’s obligations.

In conclusion, while Shri Sarthi Corporation has demonstrated resilience in legal challenges, potential buyers should remain vigilant and proactive in their approach. Doing thorough research and maintaining open communication can significantly enhance the buying experience.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The disputes centered around the timeliness of reporting and the failure to submit required documents, highlighting a few notable themes in the interactions between Shri Sarthi Corporation and their clients or regulatory bodies.

The cases under the theme of 'Timeliness of Reporting' typically involved disputes regarding the submission of tri-monthly reports. Clients claimed they had submitted these reports on time but experienced issues with receiving system-generated emails, prompting them to contest penalties imposed by the builder. On the other hand, the builder maintained that the clients had failed to submit the reports in a timely manner, adhering to their regulatory obligations.

The 'Failure to Submit Required Documents' theme stemmed from disagreements over the documentation and details necessary for project compliance. Disputes arose when the builder claimed that clients neglected to provide essential information needed for reviews or regulatory submissions.

These cases were brought to court primarily as challenges against penalties, claims of project delays, or disagreements over compliance issues. A pattern emerges where the opposing parties frequently accused the builder of non-compliance. However, it seems that the builder was well-prepared to support its case with adequate evidence and arguments, indicating a common underlying issue where buyers may have lacked sufficient understanding of documentation processes or timelines.

In many instances, the builder won due to the opposing parties not supplying enough evidence or not adhering to legal protocols. This showcases how misunderstandings or miscommunications about submission timelines and document requirements can lead to disputes. In several cases, the builder effectively defended itself against what might be perceived as exaggerated or unfounded claims from the buyers.

From this analysis, we can derive insights about the builder's reputation and the broader real estate market. While it is crucial to acknowledge that legitimate complaints do arise in the industry, the recurring theme in these cases suggests that builders like Shri Sarthi Corporation often face allegations that they can successfully counter. This highlights a potential trend where clients may erroneously believe their claims are substantiated without adequate evidence.

As a message to potential buyers, it is essential to exercise due diligence and make informed decisions when entering the real estate market. The scrutiny of these cases emphasizes that while builders can face legal challenges, a thorough analysis reveals that they may often successfully defend against unfounded claims. Buyers should approach such matters conservatively and seek credible information to discern a builder's true reliability and reputation.

This dictionary structure provides a clear overview of the topic themes identified from the case summaries and a well-rounded analysis of the situations involving Shri Sarthi Corporation.