SHRI SHABH BUILDERS

Introduction

In the dynamic landscape of real estate, assessing a builder's reliability and performance is crucial for potential buyers. This post delves into the profile of Shri Shabh Builders, analyzing their complaint history, legal cases, and offering insights for prospective homeowners.

Builder Overview

Shri Shabh Builders operates within the state of Gujarat, where they have made their mark in the construction sector. However, like many builders, they are not without legal scrutiny. With one recorded complaint and a legal case that did not favor them, the builder's performance warrants a closer inspection.

Legal Case Analysis

Cases Lost

Shri Shabh Builders has faced one legal case, which they lost. Here’s a breakdown of the incident:

• Appellant Claim: The builder argued they had complied with relevant regulations, specifically denying the alleged violations regarding the font size of their RERA registration number.
• Respondent Claim: The authority contested this, alleging that the builder did not properly display the RERA website and registration number in accordance with Circular-13 and Circular-18, particularly regarding the font size.
• Final Verdict: Ultimately, the verdict was against Shri Shabh Builders, resulting in a penalty of Rs. 20,000.

This case highlights a significant pattern regarding compliance with RERA (Real Estate Regulatory Authority) guidelines, emphasizing the importance of adhering to established regulations for builders.

Patterns and Common Factors

Cases Lost

The sole case lost by Shri Shabh Builders indicates a potential weakness in understanding or implementing regulatory requirements tied to RERA. The violation concerning font size suggests negligence regarding compliance documentation, which could impact consumer trust and regulatory standing moving forward.

Cases Won

Interestingly, there are no cases won by Shri Shabh Builders, which raises a concern about their track record. A complete inability to win cases may imply ongoing compliance challenges or poor dispute resolution strategies.

Conclusion

Shri Shabh Builders' current track record is mixed. With one complaint leading to a legal loss, potential buyers should approach with caution. It’s essential to conduct thorough research and consider the implications of a builder's past legal dealings.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Verify Compliance: Always check if the builder adheres to RERA regulations to ensure your investments are protected.
2. Research Track Record: Delve into the builder's history regarding completed projects and any legal issues that may arise.
3. Understand Contracts: Ensure that all agreements are clear and legally binding, with no hidden clauses that could compromise your investment.

General Tips When Selecting a Builder

• Look for Reviews: Seek out reviews from previous customers to gauge satisfaction levels.
• Visit Completed Projects: Whenever possible, visit completed projects to assess quality and craftsmanship.
• Inquire About Warranties: Understand what warranties are offered on the property, which can provide additional long-term security.

In summary, while Shri Shabh Builders provides an opportunity in Gujarat's market, potential buyers must carefully evaluate their history and practices before proceeding.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Shabh Builders, which it lost, reveals several key insights into their litigation patterns and the challenges they faced. The disputes can be grouped into three primary themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Disputes Over Penalties, and Litigation Due to Circular Violations.

The theme of Regulatory Non-compliance encompasses cases where the builder faced penalties for failing to adhere to established guidelines and circulars, such as not displaying the RERA registration number appropriately. These cases highlight the importance of compliance with regulatory frameworks in the real estate sector and the repercussions that non-compliance can have on builders.

Disputes Over Penalties typically arise when builders contest imposed fines related to their projects. In the cases we analyzed, the builder sought to challenge penalties from the authorities, arguing either a lack of wrongdoing or misinterpretations of the regulatory requirements. However, their efforts to dispute penalties often appear to stem from situations they created due to non-compliance or negligence in adherence to guidelines.

The theme of Litigation Due to Circular Violations particularly sheds light on how crucial it is for builders to remain updated on regulatory changes and to ensure that their practices align with these requirements. The promoter's defense in court often relied on claims of compliance, yet the rulings indicated a clear breach of specific circulars.

Common triggers for the builder's litigation seem to revolve around difficulties in understanding regulatory frameworks, failing to adequately display required information, and a general lack of due diligence in compliance. Additionally, the builder's tendency to contest imposed penalties suggests a reluctance to take full accountability for their actions.

Examining the reasons for the builder's losses in court reveals systemic issues. Frequent non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements emerged as a primary factor, alongside insufficient evidence to back their claims. Furthermore, the builder's failure to adhere to interim directions from authorities or misunderstandings concerning the nuances of land and project classifications contributed significantly to their adverse outcomes. Accordingly, these insights point to a larger need for builders like Shri Shabh Builders to engage in more thorough compliance practices and to foster better communication with regulatory bodies to avoid similar disputes in the future.