SHRI SHANTI VIJAY DEVELOPERS

Introduction

In the colorful landscape of real estate in India, potential buyers often seek reliable developers who uphold their promises and maintain compliance with regulatory standards. One such player, Shri Shanti Vijay Developers, has dispensed its services within Chhattisgarh. However, their legal history reveals a mix of challenges that buyers should be aware of. This blog post delves into the builder's legal cases, providing insights into their performance and offering guidance for prospective buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Shri Shanti Vijay Developers has faced legal scrutiny, accumulating a total of 1 complaint. The outcomes of their cases, however, paint a concerning picture. Out of 1 case filed against them, they have not won any and have lost the sole case they were involved in.

In the specific case regarding the project 'Gurudev Vihar,' the appellant, Chhattisgarh RERA, alleged that Shri Shanti Vijay Developers failed to submit mandatory documents for the project’s registration. The builder further contended that they had indeed submitted the required documents. Nonetheless, the final verdict upheld the appellant's claim, resulting in a rejection of the builder’s application for registration, coupled with a penalty of Rs. 50,000 and a prohibition on buying and selling within the project.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Patterns in Cases Lost

Shri Shanti Vijay Developers' only legal defeat highlights significant compliance issues, specifically the failure to provide necessary documentation for project registration. This reveals a broader theme of regulatory negligence, which can undercut buyer confidence and raises concerns about the builder's operational practices.

Patterns in Cases Won

Conversely, the current evidence indicates no instances where Shri Shanti Vijay Developers has successfully defended themselves in a judicial setting. Their solitary case outcome emphasizes a worrying trend, suggesting difficulties in adhering to regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Shri Shanti Vijay Developers appears to be a builder with notable regulatory hurdles that potential buyers should consider carefully. Their losses in legal battles highlight fundamental issues surrounding compliance and operational integrity.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Understand the builder’s legal track record and ensure they have valid licenses for all projects. Keeping abreast of regulatory compliance is vital.
• Documentation: Ensure that the builder provides all necessary documentation related to projects before committing to a purchase.
• Community Opinions: Seek reviews and testimonials from previous buyers to gauge their experiences with the builder.
• Regulatory Checks: Verify that the builder is registered with the RERA in your state and has cleared all necessary compliance checks effectively.

General Tips for Building Selection

• Research: Always conduct thorough research on the builder's history, including the completion rate of projects and any legal disputes.
• Transparency: Look for builders who are open about their projects' details, costs, and timelines.
• Quality Assurance: Prioritize builders who adhere to high construction quality standards and offer warranties for their projects.

---

In conclusion, while Shri Shanti Vijay Developers has the potential to deliver residential solutions, their current legal standing necessitates cautious consideration from potential buyers. Knowledge, understanding, and awareness can empower buyers in making well-informed decisions within the real estate market.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Shanti Vijay Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around regulatory compliance issues, penalties imposed for project delays, and disagreements over documentation submission.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced challenges related to their failure to submit mandatory documents for project registration. The case involving Chhattisgarh RERA is a prominent example, where the builder's application for registration of their project 'Gurudev Vihar' was rejected due to a lack of requisite documents. This highlights a troubling trend where builders may not prioritize compliance with legal requirements, potentially risking the integrity of their projects.

Penalties for project delays also emerged as a theme in these cases. Builders often face scrutiny when projects are delayed, and in the case of Shri Shanti Vijay Developers, this led to financial penalties. The imposition of a Rs. 50,000 penalty in the Chhattisgarh RERA case demonstrates how non-compliance can lead to significant financial repercussions.

The common reasons people brought cases against the builder largely revolved around contesting these penalties and the builder's attempts to justify their actions. There was also a pattern of disputes over documentation, with builders often claiming to have submitted necessary papers while regulatory bodies disputed these claims. This points to a communication gap or a lack of transparency in the relationship between builders and regulatory authorities.

The builder lost these cases primarily due to insufficient evidence to support their claims. In the case mentioned, Shri Shanti Vijay Developers maintained that they had submitted the required documents, but ultimately, the appellant's claim was upheld, indicating that the builder's evidence was inadequate. This factor, coupled with a general lack of compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, underpins the builder's losses in these cases.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance of transparency, compliance, and effective communication in the real estate sector. It serves as a cautionary tale for builders about the risks of neglecting regulatory obligations and the potential consequences of inadequate documentation.