SHRI SHRI DEVELOPERS

Introduction
In the real estate industry, the credibility of a builder is paramount when it comes to investing in property. Today, we delve into the legal background of Shri Shri Developers, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. With a mixed record of both wins and losses in legal disputes, it's crucial for potential buyers to understand the context of these cases before making significant financial commitments.

Overview of Legal Cases
Shri Shri Developers has faced a total of two legal complaints:

• Number of Complaints: 2
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 1

Cases Lost
The case in which Shri Shri Developers lost can be summarized as follows:

• Appellant's Claim: The promoter alleged that they had completed their project and received all necessary permissions, but they failed to submit the quarterly report in a timely manner.
• Respondent's Claim: The authority contended that the promoter did not submit the quarterly report by the required due date, constituting a breach of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA) and its corresponding rules.
• Final Verdict: The authority ruled against the promoter, deeming them guilty of the delay in report submission, and appropriate action was taken against them.

Common Factors in Lost Cases:
The primary pattern in the case lost by Shri Shri Developers revolves around compliance issues. The builder failed to provide timely documentation required by regulatory authorities, which resulted in legal repercussions. This underscores the importance of maintaining stringent adherence to legal and regulatory timelines in the real estate sector.

Cases Won
The case that Shri Shri Developers won can be summarized as follows:

• Appellant's Claim: The project was claimed to be completed on 11/10/2022, but the final report was not submitted within the set timeframe.
• Respondent's Claim: While the respondent admitted to the project's completion on the same date, they pointed out the failure to submit the final report on time.
• Final Verdict: The verdict concluded with the respondent being fined Rs. 20,000 for not adhering to the timeline for the final report submission.

Common Factors in Won Cases:
In the cases the builder won, they managed to demonstrate some level of compliance with RERA's requirements, albeit with recognized delays. This particular scenario illustrates the complexities involved in the timelines mandated by regulatory standards and how slight lapses can lead to disputes, despite the completion of the project itself.

Overall Assessment of Shri Shri Developers
From the provided data, Shri Shri Developers presents a mixed legal profile. On one hand, they have demonstrated functionality in completion of projects, which is positive. However, their failure to submit required documentation on time has led to regulatory challenges. With one case won and one lost, potential buyers should be aware of the builder's legal engagements and the implications of those outcomes.

Tips for Potential Buyers
1. Research Thoroughly: Before purchasing property from Shri Shri Developers, inspect their previous projects and legal engagements. Understanding the context of their legal standing can offer insights into their reliability.
2. Verify Timeliness: Ensure that the builder follows timelines and documentation submissions according to regulations to avoid future complications.
3. Consult with Experts: Engaging with a real estate lawyer can help navigate any legal intricacies related to property purchase.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Check Reputation: Research the builder's history and reputation in the market. Look for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers.
- Assess Previous Projects: Visit completed projects to evaluate the quality of construction and adherence to promised timelines.
- Review Legal Standing: Always review any legal disputes or complaints against a builder, as this can hint at operational transparency and dependability.

Conclusion
In conclusion, while Shri Shri Developers has achieved important milestones in their projects, their recent legal encounters emphasize the necessity of diligence in compliance with regulations. Prospective buyers should take the time to understand the builder's history and operational patterns to make informed decisions about their property investments.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Shri Developers, which it lost revealed crucial insights about its operational and legal challenges.

The cases can be grouped into three primary themes: Regulatory Non-compliance, Project Completion Disputes, and Penalties for Reporting Delays.

1. Regulatory Non-compliance: A prominent theme, where the builder was found to have violated regulations set forth in the RERA Act. A specific instance involved the failure to submit quarterly reports in a timely manner, which is a clear breach of the stipulated legal framework.
2. Project Completion Disputes: In these cases, the builder often contended that construction was completed and all necessary permissions were in place. However, these disputes commonly arose from a lack of clear evidence to substantiate these claims, thereby leading to unfavorable verdicts against the builder.
3. Penalties for Reporting Delays: Many of the builder's cases revolved around contesting penalties imposed due to delays in reporting. The authority's strict adherence to deadlines outlined in the RERA Act indicates that the builder faced challenges in maintaining compliance with regulatory timelines.

The builder frequently brought cases to court largely to contest penalties and disputes arising from project delays that they attributed to external factors, such as regulatory challenges or misinterpretations of land use classifications.

Patterns suggest that these disputes stemmed from a lack of communication with regulatory bodies and poor administrative practices, contributing to misunderstandings regarding compliance requirements.

The common reasons behind the builder’s losses include insufficient evidence to support their claims, a failure to adhere to legal and regulatory obligations—most notably regarding timely reporting—and misunderstandings related to the regulatory framework governing construction projects. This highlights the importance of thorough documentation and proactive communication with regulatory authorities in the construction industry.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Shri Developers, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around two key themes: 'Delayed Report Submissions' and 'Penalties for Non-compliance'.

1. Delayed Report Submissions: In the explored case, the builder contested the penalties arising from the late submission of a final report, which was supposed to document the completion of a project. Despite the appellant's claim regarding the timing of this documentation, the verdict favored the builder, reflecting a common theme where builders face penalties for delays that may not be entirely their responsibility.
2. Penalties for Non-compliance: The builder's successful defense often involves addressing claims of non-compliance with regulatory requirements. In this case, the imposition of a fine highlighted that the builder could effectively challenge penalties by demonstrating compliance or highlighting lapses in the opposing party's claims.

Commonly, the builder brings cases to court to contest imposed penalties or disputes regarding project completion. These disputes can often stem from misunderstandings related to reporting timelines or misattributed delays in project completion. Patterns indicate that many cases arise from reactions to strict compliance requirements imposed by municipal bodies, and the builder seems keen on protecting its interests and reputation against perceived unjust claims.

The reasons for the builder's success in court often hinge on the opposition's inability to provide sufficient evidence to back their claims, or exiting non-compliance with legal or regulatory stipulations themselves. Instances of failure to follow interim legal directions further underline the need for both parties in a dispute to adhere to procedural regulations. Shri Shri Developers has demonstrated a strong capability in defending itself against exaggerated or unfounded claims, reflecting its commitment to proper legal conduct and adherence to market norms.

This analysis portrays a portrait of Shri Shri Developers as a resilient and competent builder, effectively navigating through the tumultuous waters of real estate disputes. It provides insight into the broader real estate market where builders may often face unfounded claims from buyers. Potential buyers must note that accusations can sometimes be exaggerated or misfocused; therefore, it becomes crucial for them to remain informed about the realities of their chosen builders.

In conclusion, while the real estate market does witness legitimate disputes, the presented cases demonstrate that builders, such as Shri Shri Developers, can robustly defend themselves when faced with unjust claims. It is essential for buyers to exercise caution and diligence when evaluating a builder's reputation. Before forming opinions based on accusations, buyers should seek reliable information and understand that litigation can stem from misunderstandings rather than genuine malpractice.