SHRI SHRI HARI DEVELOPERS

Introduction

When it comes to selecting a reliable builder for your property needs, understanding their track record is crucial. Shri Shri Hari Developers, based in Gujarat, has attracted attention due to their recent legal challenges. This blog aims to dissect the available information regarding this builder, analyzing their performance in legal matters and offering insights for potential buyers.

Builder Overview

Name: Shri Shri Hari Developers
State of Operation: Gujarat
Number of Complaints: 1
Cases Won: 0
Cases Lost: 1

Legal Case Details

Shri Shri Hari Developers recently faced a legal challenge involving complaints about their operational conduct. Here’s a summary of the case:

1. Cases filed against the builder where the builder won: 1 case
   - Respondent Claim: The builder claimed inability to file the quarterly report on time due to a dispute with their consultant.
   - Final Verdict: The authority imposed a penalty of Rs. 25,000 on the builder for not filing the quarterly report on time.

Analysis of Legal Performance

Patterns in Lost Cases

Although the builder has only recorded one legal loss, it reflects unfavorably on their operational transparency and accountability. The case they lost emphasizes compliance issues, as the penalty was related to not filing reports on time, indicating potential organizational shortcomings in managing project documentation or consultant agreements.

Patterns in Won Cases

The single win did not favor the builder either; rather, it was a situation in which the authority placed a penalty on them. This suggests that while they might not have lost outrightly in terms of project delivery, their operational practices around timely reporting led to regulatory scrutiny and accountability measures.

Conclusion

Based on the provided data, Shri Shri Hari Developers has a challenging path ahead regarding their reputation in the market. Although they have engaged in legal disputes with minimal outcomes favoring them, the implications of not meeting compliance standards can be detrimental to potential customers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

- Research Thoroughly: Ensure you conduct in-depth research on any builder before making a decision. Look for reviews, testimonials, and any other available legal insights.- Ask About Compliance: Don't hesitate to inquire about the builder’s compliance with local regulations and documentation processes.- Request Past Projects: Check out past projects by Shri Shri Hari Developers to assess their quality and timeliness in completion.- Seek Professional Advice: Consulting with a real estate advisor or legal expert can provide valuable insights into the builder's operational standards.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

1. Verify Credentials: Always ensure that the builder is registered and has the necessary licenses to operate.
2. Look Into Financial Stability: Assess the financial health of the builder, as a stable builder is less likely to face delays or legal issues.
3. Understand Warranty Terms: Look for builders who offer substantial warranties on their projects, as this indicates their confidence in the quality of work.
4. Monitor Communication: Good communication is a sign of a reliable builder. Prefer builders who are responsive and transparent about project details.

In summary, while Shri Shri Hari Developers operates within Gujarat, potential buyers must proceed with caution given the builder's recent legal challenges. Prioritizing thorough evaluation and due diligence will enhance the chances of a satisfactory property investment.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Shri Hari Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into regulatory compliance issues and delay-related disputes.

The first type of cases involves regulatory compliance issues, particularly concerning the timely filing of quarterly reports. In one notable instance, the builder was penalized for failing to submit such a report on schedule. The defense presented by the builder attributed the delay to a dispute with their consultant, which highlights a common pattern in these cases: the tendency to blame external factors for non-compliance rather than acknowledging systemic issues within their operations.

Delay-related disputes constitute another significant theme in the cases against the builder. While the specifics of project delays were not detailed in the summary, the imposition of penalties suggests that the builder faced challenges in meeting regulatory deadlines, which could pertain to either project completion timelines or reporting requirements.

The reasons people brought cases to court primarily revolved around contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and delays. The builder's defense often revolved around disputed responsibilities, as seen in the case where they attributed their failure to file a report to a consultant dispute. This pattern indicates a lack of clear communication or defined roles in the builder's operations, which could be a common trigger for litigation.

The builder lost these cases predominantly due to insufficient evidence to support their defenses. In the reported case, the builder's reason for the delayed filing did not mitigate the fact that they failed to comply with a regulatory requirement. Furthermore, the builder's reliance on external factors to justify their actions signals a potential misunderstanding of their obligations under the law. Overall, the cases suggest that Shri Shri Hari Developers could improve its standing by emphasizing regulatory compliance and taking responsibility for project management decisions.