CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the realm of real estate, selecting a trustworthy builder is of utmost importance. One such builder, Shri Shubhanrabh Homes, known for its presence in Gujarat, has garnered some attention recently. This blog post aims to detail the builder’s performance, complaints, legal challenges, and provide insights for potential buyers considering investing in properties by this builder.
Shri Shubhanrabh Homes has faced its fair share of challenges, particularly in the legal domain. As of now, there is one recorded complaint against the builder. Here’s a breakdown of the case:
Based on the available data, Shri Shubhanrabh Homes presents a mixed picture. With only one complaint on record and a legal loss associated with non-compliance, potential buyers should approach with cautious optimism. It stands to reason that while the builder has operational experience in Gujarat, there are significant implications regarding its reliability regarding compliance and customer satisfaction.
If you're considering purchasing a property from Shri Shubhanrabh Homes, consider the following tips:
In conclusion, potentia buyers should tread carefully with Shri Shubhanrabh Homes based on the current legal scenario. Conduct thorough research, engage in diligent conversations, and prioritize compliance and quality to safeguard your investment. By following these strategies, homebuyers can significantly enhance their chances of a positive purchasing experience.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
The analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shri Shubhanrabh Homes, which it lost, reveals a pattern centered around regulatory non-compliance and penalties for failure to complete necessary documentation. One prominent theme is the frequent failure of the builder to submit mandatory reports required under the RERA Act, indicating a lack of adherence to regulatory standards that govern the construction and real estate industries.
The cases can be grouped under three common themes. First, there are instances of regulatory non-compliance, where the builder failed to meet critical legal obligations. Second, the penalty disputes often arise from the builder's claims of having completed projects, yet failing to provide requisite documentation, leading to penalties being imposed by regulatory authorities. Lastly, disputes related to project timelines highlight the builder's attempt to contest claims regarding project delays, suggesting an ongoing struggle to align practical completion with contractual obligations.
When examining the reasons the builder brought these cases to court, it becomes evident that there was a consistent effort to contest penalties imposed due to non-compliance and disputes regarding project delays that the builder attributed to external factors or misunderstandings about obligations. However, these litigations point to a recurring theme: an inadequacy in complying with the stipulated regulations and requirements that govern the real estate sector.
The loss of these cases can primarily be attributed to several key factors, including the builder's failure to provide sufficient evidence or documentation in their favor, fell short of meeting legal or regulatory requirements, and a failure to adhere to interim directions from authorities. The case summary indicates that misunderstandings about project classification and regulatory norms also played a significant role in the builder's unsuccessful litigation attempts. Overall, it suggests that potential buyers should proceed with caution regarding builders who have a history of disputes and regulatory non-compliance, as it might lead to complications during their own transaction processes.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!