No Logo Available

SHRI SIDDHI VINAYAK DEVELOPERS

3.9/5 (30 cases analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Shri Siddhi Vinayak Developers, a notable player in the Indian real estate market, has been involved in multiple legal challenges in recent years. With operations primarily in Madhya Pradesh and Gujarat, the builder has experienced a significant number of complaints and legal battles. This blog post will delve into the detailed performance of Shri Siddhi Vinayak Developers, analyzing the patterns in their legal disputes, and providing essential insights for potential buyers.

Overview of Complaints and Legal Outcomes

Shri Siddhi Vinayak Developers has faced a total of 30 complaints, out of which they have won 2 cases and lost 28 cases. Such numbers indicate an imbalance in legal outcomes and suggest potential concerns about the builder's practices and project execution.

Legal Case Against the Builder

  • Cases Filed and Lost by the Builder (3 Cases):
    • In these cases, the builder primarily defended themselves against accusations related to project registration …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Refund Disputes Non-Compliance with Regulatory Requirements Penalties for Project Delays Amenities and Facilities Disputes

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Siddhi Vinayak Developers, where the builder lost, revealed significant insights into their business practices and the challenges faced by their clients. The cases can be broadly categorized into several themes, highlighting the common grievances of the complainants.

The majority of the cases revolve around Delayed Possession Claims, where buyers reported that the builder had failed to provide possession of their properties despite receiving full payment. This was often coupled with a lack of communication regarding project timelines and expectations, leading to frustration and loss of trust from buyers.

Refund Disputes also emerged as a frequent theme, with many complainants seeking refunds due to the builder's inability to deliver properties on time or at all. In some instances, buyers had paid substantial amounts, only to find themselves without a property or a clear resolution on their investment. The builder's responses often lacked substantial …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Regulatory Non-compliance Penalties for Late Reporting Disputes over Project Registration

The analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Siddhi Vinayak Developers, which it lost reveals several critical insights into the regulatory and operational challenges faced by the company.

Firstly, the cases can be grouped into three primary themes: regulatory non-compliance, penalties for late reporting, and disputes over project registration. Each of these areas encapsulates the core issues that led to the builder's legal disputes.

  1. Regulatory Non-compliance: This theme highlights instances where the builder was found in violation of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). In one of the cases, the authority imposed a penalty for booking and selling units without proper registration, illustrating a significant lapse in following regulatory mandates.
  2. Penalties for Late Reporting: Multiple cases emphasized the builder's failure to submit financial reports and audit documentation on time. The imposition of fines for these delays indicates a possible systemic issue within the builder's …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delayed Possession Claims Non-compliance with Sales Documentation Completeness of Provided Facilities Project Delivery as per Agreement

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, which the builder won, revealed the following information. The cases outlined can be grouped under several common themes, shedding light on the types of disputes that often arise in the real estate sector.

  1. Delayed Possession Claims: A significant portion of cases involves claims by buyers regarding delayed possession of their property. In these cases, the complainants alleged that the builder had failed to hand over property as per the agreed schedule. However, the builder successfully defended itself by demonstrating compliance with the previously established timelines and contract provisions.
  2. Non-compliance with Sales Documentation: Some buyers raised issues about not receiving necessary sales documents after making payments. The builder was able to prove that the required documentation was provided within stipulated timelines, thus resolving these disputes in favor of the builder.
  3. Completeness of Provided Facilities: Complaints also emerged over …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Individual case details available for subscribers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review