SHRI SUBH INFRASTRUCTURE

Introduction

In the ever-evolving real estate market, the reputation of builders can significantly influence potential buyers' decisions. One such builder is Shri Subh Infrastructure, known primarily for its projects in Gujarat. However, the legal landscape surrounding this builder warrants a careful examination of its operations and customer service. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's legal issues, analyze case outcomes, and provide valuable tips for prospective buyers.

Legal Overview of Shri Subh Infrastructure

Shri Subh Infrastructure has received one complaint, resulting in a legal case against the builder. The numbers speak for themselves: 0 cases won and 1 case lost. This stark outcome raises questions about the builder's operational integrity and commitment to fulfilling contractual obligations.

Case Analysis

The sole legal battle involved an appellant who claimed to have paid Rs. 23,50,000 for a flat. Despite complete payment, the appellant alleged that the possession of the flat was not granted, which led to legal recourse. The builder contended that the payment had not been made in full and cited non-compliance with the agreement's terms. Ultimately, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (GERRA) ruled in favor of the appellant, mandating the builder to reimburse the full amount alongside interest.

Patterns in Legal Cases

• Pattern in Lost Cases: The only case lost by Shri Subh Infrastructure reveals a common factor: incomplete or non-compliant transactions regarding payment and possession. The appellant's claim centered on a payment that the builder disputed, highlighting a potential issue in communication or record-keeping regarding payment statuses.
• Observation in Won Cases: As the data indicates, the builder has not won any cases, suggesting a consistent pattern of being unable to substantiate their claims when legal matters arise. This is a red flag for potential buyers, indicative of broader systemic issues within their operations.

Conclusion

Based on the information available, Shri Subh Infrastructure presents a concerning picture for prospective buyers. The single complaint leading to a lost case raises doubts about their business practices, especially in financial dealings and customer service. Potential buyers must weigh these factors carefully before making a purchasing decision.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Conduct Thorough Research: Investigate the builder’s track record, including any legal disputes and their resolutions.
2. Insist on Documentation: Ensure all agreements are clear and documented, specifying payment timelines and possession dates.
3. Seek References: Talk to current and past customers to gauge their experiences with the builder.
4. Consult Legal Experts: If considering a purchase, consulting a legal expert familiar with real estate can provide guidance on potential risks.

General Tips for Choosing Any Builder

• Reputation Matters: Always prioritize builders known for their reliability and transparency.
• Visit Completed Projects: Before buying, if possible, visit completed projects to assess build quality and adherence to timelines.
• Look for Transparency: Choose builders who are open about their processes, timelines, and any potential issues.
• Evaluate Financial Stability: Ensure the builder is financially sound, which can reduce the likelihood of project delays or unfinished work.

In conclusion, while Shri Subh Infrastructure operates within Gujarat's real estate market, their legal challenges urge potential buyers to proceed with caution and equip themselves with the necessary knowledge to navigate their purchases wisely.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Subh Infrastructure, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The disputes primarily center around three topics: delayed possession claims, payment disputes, and non-compliance with agreement terms.

Many of the cases involve claims from buyers who allege that they were not provided possession of their flats despite having made full payments. For instance, in one significant case, a buyer claimed that after paying Rs. 23,50,000 for a flat, the builder failed to deliver possession, citing non-receipt of full payment and the buyer’s non-compliance with the agreement terms. However, the Gujarat Real Estate Regulatory Authority (GERRA) ruled in favor of the buyer, ordering the builder to return the payment along with interest.

A common trigger for these legal disputes is the builder's inability to fulfill their commitments, particularly concerning possession timelines. Buyers often contest what they perceive as arbitrary claims by the builder that they have not adhered to payment schedules or other contractual obligations.

The builder’s losses in these cases typically stem from insufficient evidence to support their counterclaims, along with a failure to acknowledge the regulatory requirements that govern real estate transactions. The GERRA verdicts indicate a systemic issue where the builder may not be operating in alignment with the agreed-upon terms or industry regulations, leading to repeated failures in legal proceedings.

Overall, these findings highlight the importance for potential buyers to exercise diligence when engaging with Shri Subh Infrastructure. It is crucial to carefully review contract terms, assess the builder's reputation, and consider the outcomes of previous legal disputes before making significant financial commitments.