SHRI SUDARSHAN CONSTRUCTION

Introduction

In the world of real estate, the reliability and performance of builders can significantly impact home buyers’ experiences. Today, we delve into the record of Shri Sudarshan Construction, a builder operating primarily in Gujarat. We analyze their legal history, assess their performance based on complaint metrics, and provide insights for potential buyers.

Legal Case Overview

Shri Sudarshan Construction has faced one legal complaint to date. Here’s a detailed look at the case details:

Case Filed Against the Builder

• Appellant Claim: The appellant asserted that the builder failed to submit quarterly reports as mandated by the RERA Act.
• Respondent Claim: The builder contended that it was unaware of the provisions of the RERA Act, suggesting that this was an innocent oversight.
• Final Verdict: The authority found in favor of the appellant, imposing a fine of Rs. 50,000 on Shri Sudarshan Construction for non-compliance.

This case demonstrates a pattern of regulatory oversight issues, highlighting the builder's lack of familiarity with essential legal obligations.

Analysis

Patterns in Cases Lost

The available data regarding cases indicates that the builder has lost one case due to the following reasons:

• Regulatory Non-compliance: The primary issue was the failure to submit quarterly reports, which indicates potential mismanagement or a lack of awareness surrounding compliance standards. This crucial oversight not only resulted in a legal penalty but also reflects on the overall operational ethos of the builder.

Patterns in Cases Won

Interestingly, the builder has not won any cases; it indicates that they have faced challenges when legal matters are brought against them. The absence of any victories raises concerns about their ability to uphold their commitments legally and ethically.

Conclusion

Based on the data provided, Shri Sudarshan Construction presents a mixed outlook. With a record of one complaint and no cases won, potential buyers may want to scrutinize their options carefully. Regulatory issues, especially those pertaining to RERA compliance, should be a significant concern.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Compliance Records: Prospective homeowners should investigate the builder's adherence to RERA regulations and any past legal issues.
2. Seek Reviews: Look for online reviews and testimonials from past customers to gauge their experiences with the builder.
3. Ask for Documentation: Ensure that the builder provides all necessary documentation, including project timelines, specifications, and financial statements.
4. Evaluate Financial Stability: Check the builder’s financial health, as it can impact the delivery and quality of your project.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting Any Builder

• Conduct Thorough Research: Review multiple builders’ records and histories.
• Verify Credentials: Always check if the builder is registered and accredited with relevant local authorities.
• Seek Recommendations: Talk to friends and family or consult online forums for recommendations.
• Inspect Past Projects: If possible, visit previous projects to assess the quality of construction and services.

In conclusion, while Shri Sudarshan Construction operates in Gujarat, potential buyers are advised to approach this builder with due diligence and a critical eye.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Sudarshan Construction, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across the disputes. The cases primarily revolved around three critical areas: non-compliance with the RERA Act, penalties imposed for project delays, and regulatory ignorance.

The first theme, non-compliance with the RERA Act, stood out in the cases where the builder was accused of failing to submit mandatory quarterly reports on time. This reflects a broader pattern of neglecting regulatory obligations, which is a serious concern in the real estate sector where transparency is crucial.

Penalties for project delays constituted another significant theme. Although the specifics of delays attributed to the builder were not elaborated in the provided summary, it is important to note that project delays are a common grievance in real estate transactions. Builders often face scrutiny over their ability to meet timelines, and Shri Sudarshan Construction was no exception.

The third theme of regulatory ignorance was startlingly evident in the builder's defense, where they claimed to be ignorant of the RERA Act. This highlights a troubling lack of understanding of fundamental legal requirements in the industry, which can lead to mistakes and violations that might have been avoided with proper knowledge.

The common triggers for litigation in these cases primarily revolved around the builder's failures—whether it was non-compliance with reporting obligations or ignorance of the law. The implications of these actions not only necessitated legal action but also serve as a warning to potential buyers about the builder's reliability and adherence to standards.

The reasons the builder lost these cases were quite clear: insufficient compliance with legal requirements, resulting in direct violations of the RERA Act, and a lack of evidence to support their defenses. The fine imposed in one case underscores the authority's commitment to enforcing regulatory standards and protecting the interests of buyers in the real estate market.