No Logo Available

SHRI SUKHAKARTA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Maharashtra
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in the state of Maharashtra. This post aims to provide insights into the builder's legal background, their performance in complaints, and considerations for potential buyers looking to engage with them.

Legal Background

Shri Sukhakarta Developers has one recorded complaint against them, which reveals some critical aspects of their operational practices.

Analysis of Legal Cases

  • Cases Won: The builder has had one case where they successfully sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a decision made by MahaRERA. The tribunal allowed this application, indicating that there was a legal pathway available that favored the builder in this instance.
  • Cases Lost: The builder has lost one case associated with a complaint. The details regarding this loss have not been disclosed, but it highlights that while the builder has some favorable outcomes in legal matters, they also have challenges that potential buyers should consider.

Patterns in Legal Cases

  1. Common Factors in Cases Lost: Given the limited information, we cannot identify specific factors leading to the loss as the details surrounding the case have not been elaborated upon.
  2. Common Factors in Cases Won: The successful appeal regarding delay reflects a strategic use of legal provisions; however, this does not inherently speak to the quality of construction or business practices but rather to navigating procedural aspects of legal frameworks successfully.

Overall Assessment

Considering the data, Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited presents a mixed picture. With one unresolved complaint and a lack of detailed public outcomes, potential buyers may need to proceed with caution. The single instance of a legal win does indicate some capability in managing legal challenges effectively.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Look into customer reviews, additional complaints, and overall reputation within Maharashtra.
  2. Ask Questions: Inquire about the specifics of their projects, timelines, and any legal issues that may not be publicly available.
  3. Legal Review: Consult with a legal advisor about any contracts or agreements to ensure they protect your interests.

General Tips for Buying from Any Builder

  • Check Registration: Ensure the builder is registered with relevant regulatory bodies (like MahaRERA).
  • Visit Completed Projects: Take the time to see previous projects that the builder has completed to assess quality firsthand.
  • Understand Payment Terms: Familiarize yourself with the payment schedule laid out by the builder and any financial implications of delays.

Conclusion

While Shri Sukhakarta Developers has managed a successful case in their favor, the presence of a legal complaint and a loss means that prospective buyers should approach with due diligence. By taking informed steps and engaging with the builder directly, you can make a sound decision regarding your property investment.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Delay Appeals Negligence Claims

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: delay appeals and negligence claims.

The delay appeal case illustrates a common theme in real estate litigation, where parties seek to justify or contest delays in legal actions. In this instance, the applicant sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order by MahaRERA, while the builder opposed this, arguing that the applicant was negligent in their filing. This highlights a pattern where builders may face litigation not only for delays in project completion but also for alleged delays in legal compliance or in taking legal actions, which can lead to additional penalties or legal consequences.

The negligence claims demonstrate another recurring issue in the builder's cases. The opposition to the appeal in the aforementioned case was rooted in claims of negligence, indicating that builders are often accused of being careless or inattentive to details, which can result in legal ramifications. This theme can encompass various aspects, including project management, regulatory compliance, and customer service.

Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that builders may lose due to several common factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of their obligations can often lead to unfavorable verdicts. Moreover, builders’ continued reliance on defenses based on the negligence of other parties, rather than addressing potential shortcomings in their own operations, may undermine their credibility in legal proceedings.

Overall, these cases serve as a reminder to potential buyers to be vigilant when evaluating builders. Understanding common themes in builders’ legal disputes can provide insights into their operational integrity and reliability. Buyers should consider these factors, alongside traditional metrics such as project features and pricing, to make informed decisions in the real estate market.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review