CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited is a builder operating primarily in the state of Maharashtra. This post aims to provide insights into the builder's legal background, their performance in complaints, and considerations for potential buyers looking to engage with them.
Shri Sukhakarta Developers has one recorded complaint against them, which reveals some critical aspects of their operational practices.
Considering the data, Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited presents a mixed picture. With one unresolved complaint and a lack of detailed public outcomes, potential buyers may need to proceed with caution. The single instance of a legal win does indicate some capability in managing legal challenges effectively.
While Shri Sukhakarta Developers has managed a successful case in their favor, the presence of a legal complaint and a loss means that prospective buyers should approach with due diligence. By taking informed steps and engaging with the builder directly, you can make a sound decision regarding your property investment.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Sukhakarta Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two types: delay appeals and negligence claims.
The delay appeal case illustrates a common theme in real estate litigation, where parties seek to justify or contest delays in legal actions. In this instance, the applicant sought condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order by MahaRERA, while the builder opposed this, arguing that the applicant was negligent in their filing. This highlights a pattern where builders may face litigation not only for delays in project completion but also for alleged delays in legal compliance or in taking legal actions, which can lead to additional penalties or legal consequences.
The negligence claims demonstrate another recurring issue in the builder's cases. The opposition to the appeal in the aforementioned case was rooted in claims of negligence, indicating that builders are often accused of being careless or inattentive to details, which can result in legal ramifications. This theme can encompass various aspects, including project management, regulatory compliance, and customer service.
Examining the outcomes of these cases, it's evident that builders may lose due to several common factors. Insufficient evidence to support their claims, failure to comply with legal or regulatory requirements, and misunderstandings of their obligations can often lead to unfavorable verdicts. Moreover, builders’ continued reliance on defenses based on the negligence of other parties, rather than addressing potential shortcomings in their own operations, may undermine their credibility in legal proceedings.
Overall, these cases serve as a reminder to potential buyers to be vigilant when evaluating builders. Understanding common themes in builders’ legal disputes can provide insights into their operational integrity and reliability. Buyers should consider these factors, alongside traditional metrics such as project features and pricing, to make informed decisions in the real estate market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!