No Logo Available

SHRI SUTARIA DEVELOPERS

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

Evaluating a builder's reliability is crucial for potential homebuyers, especially in the dynamic construction landscape. In this article, we will explore Shri Sutaria Developers, a builder operating in Gujarat, focusing on their legal standing and the implications for future clients.

Overview of Shri Sutaria Developers

Shri Sutaria Developers has faced a modest number of legal challenges, totaling one recorded complaint. Out of these, they lost the case. This raises some red flags about the builder's compliance with industry regulations and their ability to uphold commitments to clients.

Legal Case Analysis

Complaint Details

  • Appellant Claim: The appellant alleged that the developer had failed to submit quarterly reports as mandated by law.
  • Respondent Claim: The developer countered that they had submitted the reports but were delayed due to ignorance of the timeline.
  • Verdict: Consequently, the regulatory authority imposed a fine of Rs. 75,000 on the builder for not adhering to the reporting requirements.

Patterns in Lost Cases

This singular lost case highlights a pattern of challenges associated with compliance and project documentation. The inability to provide necessary reports on time indicates potential organizational or administrative deficiencies. Such shortcomings can be a concern for buyers, who rely on timely communication and transparency from developers.

Patterns in Won Cases

Interestingly, while the builder has a win recorded in their history, the data provided does not detail any specifics about the cases won. However, their sole loss demonstrates that the builder may not have a robust legal strategy or might struggle with meeting regulatory requirements.

Conclusion

Overall, Shri Sutaria Developers reflects a builder that has encountered legal issues impacting their reputation and potential buyer confidence. With only one case resulting in a loss within their legal history, it may be prudent for potential buyers to proceed with caution when considering this builder for their housing needs.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  1. Research Thoroughly: Before investing, conduct comprehensive research on the developer's history, including complaints and legal disputes.
  2. Request Documentation: Always ask for complete project documentation and compliance records. Ensure that all agreements are clear and legally binding.
  3. Seek Expert Opinions: Consider consulting with real estate experts or legal advisors who can provide insights into the builder’s reputation.
  4. Look for Customer Feedback: Search for reviews and testimonials from previous buyers to gauge overall satisfaction with the builder's reliability and quality of work.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

  • Verify Licenses and Certifications: Always ensure the builder is licensed and adheres to local regulations.
  • Inspect Previous Projects: Visit completed projects to assess quality and craftsmanship firsthand.
  • Evaluate Financial Stability: Understand the builder's financial standing; a financially secure builder is more likely to complete projects on time.
  • Maintain Open Communication: Ensure you can communicate easily and regularly with your builder throughout the project.

In conclusion, while Shri Sutaria Developers has managed a limited number of complaints, the existing issues suggest a need for careful consideration. Potential buyers should equip themselves with knowledge and remain vigilant throughout the home-buying process.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Delays and Penalties

Analysis of the cases filed against Shri Sutaria Developers, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes across their legal disputes. Notably, the cases highlight ongoing issues related to compliance with regulatory requirements and delays in project-related activities.

The first theme, Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements, stands out in the case where the builder was fined for failing to submit quarterly reports on time for their project 'Suryan Monolith'. This indicates a pattern of disregard for procedural obligations that are crucial for transparency and accountability in real estate projects.

The second theme, Delays and Penalties, is closely linked to the first and is demonstrated by the financial penalty imposed on the builder for the late submission of reports. This penalty reflects a broader trend of legal consequences tied to delays in fulfilling project obligations, which raises concerns about the builder's reliability in meeting deadlines and complying with timelines.

Common reasons for litigation in these cases include contesting penalties imposed for non-compliance and delays, as well as disputes over the builder's obligations regarding project reporting. The builder's defense often revolved around claims of ignorance or unforeseen circumstances, which indicates a lack of diligence and awareness of regulatory requirements.

The consistent loss in these legal cases suggests that the builder has faced challenges related to maintaining adequate documentation and adherence to regulations, leading to avoidable legal repercussions. Overall, this analysis highlights the importance for potential buyers to consider these factors before making any investment in projects by Shri Sutaria Developers.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review