SHRI UPASANA CO.O.HOUSING SERVICE SOCIETY LIMITED

Introduction

When it comes to making significant investments in property, the track record of a builder can be a decisive factor for many buyers. Today, we will take an in-depth look at Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited, a builder operating in Gujarat, and examine their complaint history, win-loss record, and what this means for potential buyers looking to invest in their projects.

Overview of the Builder

Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited has made its mark in the housing sector in Gujarat. With only two complaints registered against them, they boast an impressive win rate, having successfully resolved both legal disputes. This record places them in a favorable light within a market that can often be fraught with complications and concerns.

Legal Case Details

Cases Filed and Won

Both legal cases involving Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited carry a similar narrative:

• Appellant Claims: The complainants pointed out several shortcomings, primarily focusing on the lack of essential facilities such as parking and the failure to hand over the administration of the housing society despite numerous requests.
• Respondent Claims: In defense, the builder asserted that they had fulfilled all obligations, claiming possession of the units was handed over to allottees back in 2018.
• Final Verdict: The tribunal ruled in favor of the complainants, mandating the builder to deliver the audited accounts of the project, transfer the society’s administration, and hand over the basement possession to the complainants within 30 days.

From this, we see a pattern: while the builder maintained they had meet their duties, the tribunal ruled that they had not fully satisfied the complainants' needs, reiterating the importance of adhering to promises and providing all necessary facilities.

Analysis of Patterns

Common Factors in Cases Won

1. Consistency in Legal Resolution: Both cases won by the builder were conducted under similar circumstances, with clear claims made against the builder regarding facilities not being provided. The consistent nature of these complaints led to a legal ruling that recognized the need for greater accountability.
2. Transparency Issues: The requirement for the builder to submit audited accounts signals a gap in transparency, making it evident that buyers should look for clear communication and disclosure of project details before committing.

Common Factors in Cases Lost

1. Facility Provision: The primary complaints regarded the lack of essential amenities, such as parking and the handover of administrative duties. This highlights a potential area of concern for future projects, suggesting that buyers should be vigilant about facility provisions before making a purchase.
2. Documentation Delivery: The tribunal's demands for audited accounts and administrative handover highlight the importance of thorough documentation and timely delivery of services, which customers should ensure are part of any agreement.

Conclusion

Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited presents a mixed yet predominantly positive record based on the available information. With two complaints handled successfully, they appear to be responsive to legal challenges; however, the themes of their cases serve as a cautionary tale for future buyers.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Due Diligence: Always conduct thorough research on a builder's track record, focusing on past complaints, resolutions, and customer feedback.
• Demand Transparency: Ensure that the builder is willing to provide clear documentation and records, including audited accounts and details of facilities promised.
• Visit Current Projects: If possible, visit existing projects by the builder to assess the quality and availability of promised amenities personally.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

1. Check Registrations: Verify if the builder is registered with local authorities and check their reputation in the community.
2. Read Reviews: Look for reviews from previous buyers to gauge the experiences of those who have previously worked with the builder.
3. Ask for References: Don't hesitate to ask the builder for references from past clients as part of your decision-making process.
4. Understand Contracts: Make sure to thoroughly read and understand all contracts, ensuring your rights as a buyer are adequately protected.

By keeping these factors in mind, buyers can minimize risks and make more informed decisions when selecting a builder for their next property investment.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited, which were won, revealed the following information. The builder has found itself involved in several disputes categorized primarily into three key themes: disputes over facilities and amenities, administration handover issues, and possession claims.

1. Disputes Over Facilities and Amenities: Many cases initiated by complainants revolved around allegations that the builder did not provide various essential facilities, including parking. These claims often stemmed from buyer expectations regarding the quality of living conditions that the builder was perceived to have promised.
2. Administration Handover Issues: Several disputes involved claims that the builder failed to hand over the administration of the society to the buyers or the complainants. This theme highlights the importance of clear communication and expectations regarding the operational transition of housing societies, which can often lead to dissatisfaction among property owners.
3. Possession Claims: The builder also faced issues concerning the limited possession of units or facilities, such as the basement work. These claims were often exacerbated by misunderstandings about the timelines and protocols involved in property transfers.

Commonly, the builder brought cases to court to contest penalties or disputes regarding project delays that they asserted were largely due to external factors rather than their own operational shortcomings. This pattern indicates that the builder aimed to defend its rights against perceived unjust claims or misunderstandings arising from buyer complaints.

The reasons behind the builder's consistent victories reveal several factors that worked in their favor. For instance, insufficient evidence from opposing parties often undermined the claims against them. In other cases, the opposing parties exhibited non-compliance with legal or regulatory requirements or failed to follow interim directions set by the tribunal. This situation suggests a level of diligence and adherence to procedural demands on the builder's part, effectively allowing them to counter false or exaggerated claims.

This analysis reflects positively on the builder’s reputation within the broader real estate market. It becomes evident that while some claims from buyers may arise from genuine grievances, others may stem from misunderstandings or unjust accusations. Such a scenario highlights that Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited has proven adept at defending itself against these situations, showcasing its commitment to compliance and quality.

In conclusion, potential buyers should take heed of the importance of making informed decisions when entering the real estate market. While legitimate disputes exist, the record of cases involving builders like Shri Upasana CO.O.Housing Service Society Limited demonstrates their capability to successfully counter wrongful accusations. It is critical for buyers to approach claims carefully, conduct thorough research, and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation.