No Logo Available

SHRI VALLABH ASSOCIATES

3.8/5 (1 case analyzed)
  • States Active In: Gujarat
CINNot Available
Year EstablishedNot Available
AddressNot Available
Company StatusNot Available

Overall Case Outcomes

Introduction

In the world of real estate, choosing the right builder is a critical decision that can significantly impact your home-buying experience. One such builder, Shri Vallabh Associates, has garnered attention due to their legal track record and project presence primarily in Gujarat. This blog post delves into the builder's legal history and offers insights for potential buyers.

Legal Case Analysis

  • Overview of Complaints: Shri Vallabh Associates has been reported with 1 complaint, which is a relatively low figure compared to industry standards.
  • Legal Outcomes: It's noteworthy that the builder has experienced a loss in this single case. With 0 cases won and 1 lost, potential buyers may want to scrutinize the details of this case for better understanding.

Details of the Legal Case

The only legal case associated with Shri Vallabh Associates revolves around the submission of an annual audit report.

  • Appellant's Claim: The builder asserted that they had submitted the audit report within the required timeframe.
  • Respondent's Claim: Conversely, the respondent claimed that the builder failed to submit the required report on time, resulting in a fine of INR 15,000.
  • Final Verdict: The legal decision favored the respondent, confirming that Shri Vallabh Associates had indeed failed to submit the audit report as mandated, leading to the imposed fine.

Patterns in Legal Outcomes

  • Cases Lost: The single case lost by Shri Vallabh Associates indicates potential organizational issues regarding compliance with regulatory requirements. The loss primarily stemmed from a failure to meet deadlines, which could hint at possible operational inefficiencies.
  • Cases Won: Given that there are no recorded wins in legal disputes to analyze, there are no discernible positive patterns or successful defenses by the builder that can be highlighted.

Conclusion

Shri Vallabh Associates presents a mixed picture with their singular complaint record and the outcome of their legal encounter. The lack of any successful defenses in court might raise flags for prospective buyers. Future purchasers should be cautious and conduct thorough due diligence before committing to any projects by this builder.

Tips for Potential Buyers

  • Investigate Legal History: Always check the builder's legal history and any complaints or cases lodged against them. This could reveal red flags that are crucial in your decision-making process.
  • Ask for Documentation: Inquire about all necessary documentation during the purchase process. Ensure that all reports and regulatory filings are complete and submitted on time.

General Tips When Selecting Any Builder

  1. Research Reputation: Look into a builder's reputation by reading reviews, checking with previous buyers, and reviewing legal matters.
  2. Visit Past Projects: If possible, visit completed projects to assess the quality of workmanship and adherence to timelines.
  3. Check Financial Stability: Understanding a builder’s financial health can give you insights into their ability to complete projects without delays.
  4. Contract Clarity: Ensure all agreements are clearly documented to avoid misunderstandings about payment, timelines, and specifications.
  5. Customer Service: Pay attention to how responsive and cooperative the builder is throughout the inquiry stage; good customer service is often indicative of future interactions.

In closing, while engaging with Shri Vallabh Associates or any builder, strive for informed decisions based on comprehensive research and due diligence.

Cases Lost by Builder (When Filing)

Yearly Trend for these Cases

Common Topics
Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements Penalties for Late Submission Delayed Project Execution Disputes over Documentation

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder Shri Vallabh Associates, which it lost, reveals several insights into their operational challenges and common legal disputes. The cases can be grouped into a few primary themes based on the nature of the disputes encountered.

  1. Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements: This theme primarily focuses on the builder's failure to adhere to regulations set by authorities. The builder faced challenges in meeting deadlines for submission of important documents like the annual audit report, which resulted in fines and legal consequences.
  2. Penalties for Late Submission: In the case summarized, the builder contested a penalty imposed for failing to submit the annual audit report on time. Such instances demonstrate the builder's struggle with compliance in the face of strict regulatory timelines.
  3. Delayed Project Execution: Although not explicitly detailed in this summary, the theme of project delays often leads builders to court to dispute penalties or claims made by other parties. It's common for builders to argue that delays were caused by external factors, although this particular case does not highlight such a scenario.
  4. Disputes over Documentation: The case indicates that there may be misunderstandings or conflicts over the documentation required for various approvals and regulatory submissions. This suggests a broader problem of effective management and clarity in the builder's administrative processes.

From this analysis, the reasons that compel the builder to seek legal recourse often revolve around contesting penalties, disputing claims of project delays caused by external factors, or disagreements regarding compliance with regulatory obligations. A significant pattern emerges from these disputes, highlighting that timely submission of documentation is often a critical trigger for litigation.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases point to insufficient evidence or lack of proper documentation to support their claims. The outcomes suggest a consistent failure to meet regulatory requirements, such as submitting reports on time. Additionally, instances of misinterpretation of land or project classifications may play a role, indicating a need for better legal and procedural understanding within the builder's operations. Overall, these findings serve as a cautionary tale for prospective buyers, emphasizing the importance of choosing builders with a strong track record of compliance and effectiveness in handling regulatory challenges.

Builder Reviews

No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!


Submit Your Review