SHRI VENKATESH SHARDA INFRACON

Understanding Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon: A Builder's Legal Journey

When it comes to choosing a builder, understanding their legal history can play a crucial role in making an informed decision. Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon is a builder operating primarily in Maharashtra. Though the company has faced some challenges, the outcome of their legal encounters paints a picture worth examining. In this blog, we will delve into the details of the builder's legal cases, analyze any recurring themes in their disputes, and offer tips for prospective buyers.

Legal Background

Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon has encountered a total of 3 complaints, all of which have been resolved in favor of the builder, leading to a perfect win record of 3 cases won and 0 cases lost. Each of these cases revolved around similar claims regarding the provision of adequate parking spaces and driveways.

Analysis of Cases Won

All three cases won by Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon involved complaints from appellants regarding insufficient parking provisions and operational driveways, which they claimed caused significant inconvenience. In the builder's defense, they consistently maintained that the parking spaces and driveways were in accordance with the sanctioned plans and regulations. The final verdict in each case set aside the specific directions posed in prior orders, allowing the appellant to pursue resolution through the appropriate authorities for any grievances concerning parking spaces.

This pattern indicates a strong alignment of the builder's practices with the sanctioned regulations, demonstrating their commitment to following legal procedures and compliance in their project implementations. It also indicates that issues raised by buyers may often stem from misinterpretations or misunderstandings of what was approved versus what was delivered.

Overall Assessment

Based on the available data, Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon appears to maintain a strong legal standing, with no cases lost and a solid defense against claims of non-compliance. However, the consistent nature of the complaints regarding parking could suggest a need for future buyers to carefully assess any project documentation and specifications related to parking and shared spaces prior to finalizing their purchase.

Tips for Potential Buyers

• Conduct Due Diligence: Always research the builder's past projects, including community feedback and any legal issues that may have arisen.
• Clarify Specifications: Before making a commitment, ensure all building plans detail aspects such as parking and common areas. Clear documentation can help mitigate future disputes.
• Seek Legal Advice: If you're uncertain about any agreements or terms outlined by the builder, consider consulting a legal professional with experience in real estate.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Review Finished Projects: Visit completed projects by the builder to see the standards of construction and compliance first-hand.
• Communication is Key: Open lines of communication with the builder can lead to an overall better experience. Always feel free to ask questions and seek clarifications.
• Check for Reviews and Complaints: Online platforms and real estate forums can provide valuable insights into other buyers' experiences with a particular builder.

In conclusion, Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon appears to be a reliable choice based on their legal performance. However, as a potential buyer, always remember to conduct thorough research and understand all aspects of the purchasing process to safeguard your investment.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The builder, Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon, primarily faced disputes revolving around parking space compliance and driveway regulations. The recurring claim from appellants centered on the alleged failure to provide adequate parking spaces and properly designed driveways, which they argued caused significant inconvenience.

The builder’s common reasons for bringing these cases to court included contesting claims related to insufficiently provided parking facilities as detailed in the sanctioned plans and regulations. These legal challenges often arose due to disagreements over actual provisions versus what was expected or understood by the buyers within the developmental context.

Upon reviewing the summaries of these cases, a pattern emerges wherein the builder frequently won due to the opposing parties’ failure to present sufficient evidence backing their claims. The courts acknowledged that the builder adhered to the sanctioned plans and building regulations, which ultimately supported its defense. Moreover, the ability of the builder to effectively challenge exaggerated or unfounded claims presented by buyers demonstrates its commitment to regulatory compliance and quality construction.

This trend highlights important insights into the builder's reputation and the broader real estate market. Buyers occasionally raise false accusations, leading to unnecessary legal disputes. Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon, showcased as a builder with a robust track record, successfully defends against these unjust claims, reinforcing its credibility in the marketplace.

Potential buyers should remain vigilant and informed. While some disputes in the real estate sector are legitimate, this analysis suggests builders like Shri Venkatesh Sharda Infracon can often effectively combat unfounded allegations. It is crucial for buyers to carefully assess claims and seek accurate information before jumping to conclusions regarding a builder’s reputation.