CIN | AAV-6284 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | 189 A,Onkar Nagar S.O, DELHI NEW DELHI, Delhi, India - 110035 |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP operates predominantly in Punjab and has established a solid reputation concerning its legal standing in the real estate sector. With only 2 recorded complaints and an impressive record of winning both cases, the builder demonstrates a commitment to resolving disputes effectively and efficiently.
Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP was involved in 2 legal cases concerning issues related to their project, Florence Park. In both instances, the complaints were dismissed as withdrawn after parties reached settlements.
Both cases share a common theme: disputes appear to be resolved amicably, resulting in no losses for the builder, reinforcing Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP's credibility. In examining these cases, it is evident that potential issues may have been navigated to mutual satisfaction without adverse impacts on the builder's overall record.
Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP appears to operate with a commendable level of integrity, addressing concerns formally raised by clients while preventing significant legal repercussions. The outcome of both legal cases suggests a propensity for resolving conflicts amicably, contributing positively to their image as a builder in Punjab.
If considering a purchase from Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP, potential buyers should:
In conclusion, Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP stands out as a builder in Punjab worth considering. With a strong track record of successful resolutions in disputes and an emphasis on project quality, they provide both reliability and reassurance for potential homebuyers.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. The cases primarily revolved around allegations related to the project Florence Park, where complainants brought forward various claims of dissatisfaction. However, the outcomes showed the builders' capacity to navigate through these disputes effectively.
Upon grouping the different kinds of cases, two primary themes emerge: withdrawal of complaints and disputes related to project quality. The recurring nature of these complaints suggests a pattern where buyers, perhaps after further discussions, chose to withdraw their grievances, indicative of either a lack of merit in their claims or a resolution achieved outside the courtroom. Additionally, the nature of these disputes points to buyers' perceptions or expectations possibly clashing with the realities of project deliverables.
The reasons behind the builder frequently bringing these cases to court seem tied to contesting accusations of wrongdoing and disputing claims that could tarnish their reputation. It reflects a proactive stance on the builder's part to clear their name and uphold the project's integrity. Such cases are often triggered by buyers' hesitance or misunderstandings concerning project developments, leading to tensions and subsequent disputes.
In examining the reasons for the builder's success in these cases, various factors stand out. Primarily, the opposing parties appeared to lack sufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, resulting in complaints being dismissed. This reveals the importance of due diligence and careful examination before pursuing legal action. Furthermore, there may have been non-compliance with established legal, regulatory requirements on the complainants' part, suggesting that not all allegations carry the weight of merit.
This analysis not only highlights the builder’s track record in defending itself successfully but also underscores the dynamics within the real estate market. It signals to potential buyers that while legitimate disputes exist, there is also the risk of facing unfounded accusations that could lead to unnecessary litigation. The results of these cases showcase Shri Vishnu Facilities Management LLP as an entity capable of effectively countering false or exaggerated claims from buyers or other parties.
In conclusion, potential buyers are advised to approach claims with a discerning eye and to seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation. Understanding the context and background of disputes can provide valuable insights, and much like in the cases analyzed, there might be more to the story than what meets the eye. Knowledge is power, and informed decisions are vital in safeguarding one's investment in the real estate market.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!