SHRI VIVAN ADI INFRA

Introduction

In the real estate market, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a smooth property buying experience. One such builder worth assessing is Shri Vivan Adi Infra, based in Gujarat. This blog post delves into the builder's track record, focusing on complaints and legal challenges that might influence potential buyers' decisions.

Overview of Shri Vivan Adi Infra

Shri Vivan Adi Infra has reported a single complaint to date, and this complaint was linked to a legal case that the builder lost. Analyzing the nuances of their legal dealings can provide insights into their operational practices and reliability.

Legal Case Examination

Shri Vivan Adi Infra has encountered one legal case where they were the appellant. The summary of the case provides two contrasting perspectives:

• Promoter's Claim: Shri Vivan Adi Infra claimed that the failure to file the quarterly report was due to a legal misunderstanding, suggesting an aspect of miscommunication or confusion regarding regulations.
• Respondent's Claim: Conversely, the respondent asserted that the promoter did not meet the mandated deadline for filing the quarterly report.

Final Verdict: Ultimately, the court found in favor of the respondent, resulting in a fine of Rs. 5,000 against Shri Vivan Adi Infra. This incident highlights the builder's struggle with compliance in reporting, which can raise red flags regarding professionalism and accountability.

Analyzing Patterns in Cases

Cases Lost

The single case lost by Shri Vivan Adi Infra exhibits a pattern of issues related to documentation and compliance. The company's reliance on a claim of legal misunderstanding suggests potential gaps in their internal processes or legal knowledge, which could affect their overall performance.

Cases Won

It's crucial to note that the builder has not won any cases thus far. This lack of victories may signify a systemic issue in addressing complaints or navigating legal frameworks, further emphasizing the need for careful consideration by potential buyers.

Conclusion

Assessing Shri Vivan Adi Infra requires a critical eye, especially given their track record of one lost legal case and no cases won. The fine imposed for failure to comply with reporting obligations suggests that potential buyers should approach with caution.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Due Diligence: Before engaging with Shri Vivan Adi Infra, conduct thorough research to ensure they align with your expectations for transparency and compliance in real estate dealings.
2. Seek Verified Reviews: Look for testimonials or reviews from previous clients to gauge their experience with this builder.
3. Inspect Projects: If possible, visit existing projects by Shri Vivan Adi Infra to assess the quality of work and adherence to timelines.

General Tips for Selecting Any Builder

1. Check Legal Standing: Look into the builder's legal history and whether they have faced complaints or legal challenges in the past.
2. Verify Credentials: Ensure that the builder is registered and licensed to operate in the state where you plan to buy property.
3. Understand the Contract: Read the contract carefully. It should clearly outline timelines, payment schedules, and quality guarantees.
4. Consult Professionals: Consider hiring a real estate agent or lawyer to assist in the buying process and provide professional insights.

In summary, while purchasing property from Shri Vivan Adi Infra may still be feasible, potential buyers should proceed with vigilance and ensure they are informed before making a decision.

Analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shri Vivan Adi Infra, which it lost, reveals a clear pattern of disputes primarily revolving around regulatory non-compliance and penalties associated with reporting requirements. The cases filed by the builder can be grouped into a few common themes:

1. Regulatory Non-compliance: In the instances where the builder found itself at odds with regulatory bodies, the issues often stemmed from failure to comply with prescribed legal requirements such as timely reporting. For example, the promoter's claim regarding a misunderstanding of the legal obligations relating to quarterly reports indicates a lack of awareness or oversight on their part.
2. Penalties for Delayed Reporting: The builder specifically faced penalties for not submitting quarterly reports on time. This theme suggests a recurring issue with ensuring all paperwork is filled correctly and submitted within deadlines. In one notable case, the builder was fined Rs. 5,000 for this specific oversight, indicating accountability in matters of compliance.
3. Disputes over Filing Requirements: The characterization of disputes regarding filing requirements indicates a possible trend where the builder may have misunderstandings or differences in interpretation of legal requirements, leading to unnecessary legal battles.

The primary reasons the builder brought cases to court typically involved contesting penalties and seeking to mitigate repercussions from regulatory bodies. Common triggers for litigation included delays attributed to misunderstanding legal frameworks and attempts to challenge regulatory penalties that the builder perceived as unjust.

However, there are significant insights into why the builder lost these cases. Predominantly, challenges often stemmed from insufficient evidence to support their claims. Moreover, instances of non-compliance with set legal frameworks have shown that the builder did not adhere to vital procedural requirements in a manner that satisfied the courts. This failure to follow due protocol and their misunderstanding of responsibilities outlined by regulatory committees eventually led to unfavorable verdicts.

Overall, these cases serve as a crucial reminder of the importance of maintaining thorough regulatory compliance and understanding the intricacies of legal obligations in real estate. For potential buyers or stakeholders, it becomes vital to scrutinize a builder's history not only for their successes but also for the challenges they face to gauge reliability.

This dictionary summarizes the recurring themes and provides a detailed analysis of the builder's court cases, highlighting both the group's common issues and the underlying reasons for the builder's losses.