SHRIJI BAPA BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED

Introduction

Purchasing property is a significant investment, and selecting the right builder can greatly influence your experience. One such builder in Gujarat is Shriji Bapa Buildcon Private Limited. This blog provides an overview of the builder's track record based on legal cases, complaints, and the outcomes of these cases.

Company Overview

Name: Shriji Bapa Buildcon Private Limited States with Projects: Gujarat

Legal Case Summary

Total Complaints: 2 Cases Won: 1 Cases Lost: 1

Breakdown of Legal Cases

1. Case Won by the Builder
   • Claim by Appellant: Shriji Bapa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. asserted that it had submitted the annual audit report for the financial year 2017-18.
   • Claim by Respondent: GUJRERA asserted that the builder failed to submit the report, leading to a show-cause notice.
   • Final Verdict: The builder was exempted from penalties due to the circumstance regarding the report submission.
2. Case Filed Against the Builder (Won by the Builder)
   • Claim by Appellant: A respondent accused the builder of not submitting quarterly reports on time, claiming a violation of the RERA Act.
   • Claim by Respondent: The builder argued a lack of awareness about the law, emphasizing no intent to violate it.
   • Final Verdict: The authority imposed a fine on the respondent for their claims rather than on the builder, indicating the builder's possible adherence to regulations.

Analysis of Case Patterns

Cases Lost

- Patterns: The single case lost by Shriji Bapa Buildcon reflects a scenario where documentation submission was contested. Such issues may arise in the communication or understanding of regulatory requirements, emphasizing the importance for builders to maintain thorough records.

Cases Won

- Patterns: The builder's successful outcomes suggest competence in legal defenses, specifically regarding report submissions and responses to regulatory bodies. The cases indicate that while the builder was challenged, they effectively navigated the legal landscape, ultimately resulting in favorable outcomes.

Conclusion

Based on the available data, Shriji Bapa Buildcon Private Limited has displayed resilience in legal matters, with a 50% success rate in cases. Although they have faced complaints, their ability to win a case strengthens the perception of their commitment to regulatory compliance.

Tips for Potential Buyers

- Research Thoroughly: Before purchasing, review the builder's track record in terms of complaints and legal matters. - Request Documentation: Ensure that all required reports and documents are provided by the builder and verify their authenticity. - Ask for References: Speak to previous buyers to understand their experiences with the builder.

General Tips for Buyers When Selecting a Builder

- Check for Certifications: Always ensure that the builder is registered with local authorities and adheres to RERA regulations.- Evaluate Project Quality: Visit ongoing and completed projects to assess construction quality and design.- Understand Terms and Conditions: Carefully read the terms in your contractual agreement to avoid misunderstandings.

By taking these steps, potential buyers can make informed decisions when selecting a builder and mitigate risks associated with real estate investments.

Analysis of the cases filed against Shriji Bapa Buildcon Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes across the disputes. The cases highlight ongoing issues primarily in two areas: regulatory compliance and delayed reporting/transparency.

In terms of regulatory compliance, the builder faced legal action due to a violation of the RERA Act by failing to submit quarterly reports on time. This reflects a broader pattern of non-compliance with statutory requirements, which is a common theme in real estate disputes. The builder's defense—that they were not aware of the law—indicates a significant lack of understanding of their obligations under the RERA Act, which could potentially lead to further legal issues down the line.

The delayed reporting and transparency theme is closely tied to the compliance issues, as the late submission of reports hampers the ability of buyers and regulators to ascertain the project's status effectively. This transparency is crucial in maintaining trust and adherence to legal frameworks in the real estate sector.

The common trigger for the builder's litigation in these cases was the imposition of penalties for non-compliance, highlighting the legal risks associated with unawareness of regulatory requirements. The builder's loss in these cases can be attributed primarily to their insufficient defense, which centered on a lack of knowledge about the law rather than valid reasons for the delay or non-compliance.

Overall, these cases underscore the importance for builders to familiarize themselves with the RERA Act and other relevant legislation to avoid legal repercussions. Buyers should take note of these issues as they represent significant concerns about the builder's reliability and transparency.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shriji Bapa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd., which it won, revealed the following information. The builder's disputes can primarily be categorized into three themes: Regulatory Compliance Disputes, Claims of Non-submission of Reports, and Penalties and Responses to Show-cause Notices.

In the context of Regulatory Compliance Disputes, the builder faced issues regarding the acceptance of their annual audit report for the financial year 2017-18.

The situation arose when GUJRERA claimed the report had not been submitted, resulting in a show-cause notice issued to the appellant.

This highlights a common type of case where builders find themselves contesting claims regarding compliance with regulatory requirements.

The primary reason for bringing this case to court was to contest the penalty that was imposed due to the alleged non-compliance with the submission of regulatory documents.

It reveals a pattern where builders are often in contentious battles over paperwork and regulatory responsibilities, sometimes due to misunderstandings or miscommunications.

Shriji Bapa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. was successful in this case primarily due to the lack of sufficient evidence from the respondent, GUJRERA.

The court found that the builder had indeed submitted the annual audit report, which secured an exemption from the penalty.

This demonstrates that the builder effectively defended itself against what could be interpreted as an exaggerated claim, showcasing their diligence and adherence to compliance when appropriate.

The analysis of these cases suggests a particular trend in the real estate market where builders may face unfounded claims from other parties, including regulatory bodies.

Moreover, it reveals the potential for conflict between builders and buyers or authorities, annually spurred by miscommunication or misinterpretation of laws pertaining to real estate.

This concludes that Shriji Bapa Buildcon Private Limited has established a robust track record in the courts, proving their ability to handle legal challenges efficiently.

For potential buyers, this serves as an important takeaway: while the real estate market can indeed harbor legitimate disputes, it is crucial to approach claims against builders with discernment.

There is a possibility that builders may be wrongfully accused, and the ability of companies like Shriji Bapa Buildcon to successfully defend against such claims underscores the necessity for buyers to seek reliable information and make informed decisions before forming opinions about a builder’s reputation.

This dictionary provides a structured overview of the themes in the cases brought by Shriji Bapa Buildcon Pvt. Ltd. and a detailed analysis encapsulated in the overall summary.