CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
When considering real estate investments, it’s essential to assess the reputation and reliability of builders. In this blog post, we will delve into the performance of Shripal Developers, a builder operating in Rajasthan, and provide insights based on their legal records.
Shripal Developers has generated some attention in the construction and real estate sector, particularly in Rajasthan. However, potential buyers and investors should analyze the builder's complaint history and legal standings before making commitments.
Shripal Developers has faced a total of 1 complaint. Unfortunately, they have lost that case, which may raise some concern for potential investors.
The sole legal action against Shripal Developers resulted in a verdict where a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was imposed due to their failure to complete a project within the estimated time frame and their lack of application for a project extension. This incident could reflect on the builder's commitment to timely delivery and customer satisfaction.
Understanding the patterns in the builder’s legal outcomes is crucial:
Interestingly, while Shripal Developers has not won any cases, the lack of this record suggests they may not have a strong defense mechanism or strategy when faced with customer grievances or legal challenges. This lack ultimately reflects on their operational practices and accountability.
Based on the data presented, Shripal Developers has a borderline reputation within the industry, especially considering their legal history with a lost case. Potential buyers should approach this builder with caution and carry out comprehensive due diligence before making any purchases.
By leveraging this information, potential buyers can make informed decisions when considering working with builders like Shripal Developers in Rajasthan.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shripal Developers, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns underlying the disputes. The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: Delayed Possession Claims and Penalties for Project Delays.
The first type of cases primarily involves claims made by buyers regarding delays in the possession of their properties. Buyers often contend that the builder failed to adhere to the promised timelines, leading to significant delays in project completion. This is a common theme in real estate disputes, as buyers expect and rely on timely possession of their investments.
The second category revolves around penalties imposed on the builder for these delays. In the case summarized, a penalty of Rs. 2,00,000 was imposed on Shripal Developers for failing to complete a project within the estimated completion date without applying for an extension. This highlights a crucial regulatory requirement in the real estate sector, where builders must meet deadlines or face the consequences.
A pattern emerges from these cases: buyers are increasingly contesting delays and the associated penalties, reflecting a growing demand for accountability in the real estate market. Common triggers for litigation include a lack of communication regarding project timelines, insufficient updates on delays, and disagreements over the builder's obligations post-delay.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, the failure to apply for an extension for the project completion timeline resulted in the imposition of penalties, indicating a lack of compliance with regulatory procedures. Moreover, the builder's defenses were likely inadequate, failing to convince the court that the delays were justified or beyond their control.
In conclusion, the analysis of these cases underscores the importance of transparency, adherence to timelines, and regulatory compliance in the real estate sector. Buyers should be vigilant and informed about their rights, particularly concerning delayed possession and project timelines. When considering a builder, it's crucial to look at their track record with such matters to make informed decisions.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
F 3(487)/2017 | Rajasthan | The respondent promoter failed to complete the re… | ["Failure to comple… | {"appellant_claim": "", "respondent_claim": "", "… | Shripal Developers | https://rera.rajasthan.gov.in/Content/pdf/9842F.3(487),.pdf |