CIN | U45400KA2016PTC085337 |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | No. 31, 2nd Main Road, T. Chowdaiah Road, Sadashivanagar, Bengaluru Bangalore KA 560080 IN |
Company Status | Private |
Overall Case Outcomes
Introduction
In the growing world of real estate, the credibility of a builder holds significant weight in determining the purchasing decisions of potential buyers. SHRIPROP DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, operating mainly in Karnataka, is a builder that has faced its share of legal challenges. This blog post delves into the builder's history of complaints and legal cases, assessing their impact on potential buyers.
Overview of Complaints and Legal Cases
SHRIPROP DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED has been involved in a total of 4 complaints, with an equal split in the outcome of these legal cases—2 won and 2 lost. It’s essential to analyze the details of these cases to understand the context of the builder's dealings.
Cases Filed Against the Builder
- Case Lost (1 Case): In one notable case, a complainant alleged that the builder would not complete and hand over the apartment on time and sought a refund of the booking …
Cases Lost by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
Analysis of the cases filed against Shriprop Developers Private Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolve around two topics: refund claims and settlement disputes.
The refund claims often involve plaintiffs seeking to recover their booking amounts due to various grievances with the project. For instance, the plaintiff in the first case sought a refund of the booking amount, citing insufficient evidence to support his claim. This indicates a common theme where plaintiffs feel aggrieved due to a lack of transparency or fulfillment of promises made by the builder.
Settlement disputes represent another significant category of cases against the builder. In these scenarios, the builder and the plaintiff may have reached an agreement, but the terms of the settlement become a point of contention. The second case exemplifies this, where the builder claimed where the complainant had agreed to settle the dispute and …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Filing)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, which it won, revealed the following information. These cases predominantly revolved around claims for the return of money given by the plaintiff to the defendant. While there was no significant defense presented by the opposing parties in the available summaries, the outcomes illustrate a recurring theme where the builder successfully settled disputes through compromise and received due amounts, indicating a focus on resolving conflicts rather than prolonged litigation.
Common themes identified include 'Claims for Return of Money' where the builder defended against requests for repayment, and 'Disputes Related to Project Delays' where project timelines and responsibilities were often contested. The builder overall sought to reaffirm its standing on financial agreements and resolve misunderstandings related to payments.
The reasons the builder commonly brought these cases to court appear to be rooted in defending against unwarranted claims—specifically, disputes arising from potential misunderstandings with …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Cases Won by Builder (When Defending)
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Common Topics
An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, SHRIPROP DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, which the builder won, revealed the following information. These cases primarily revolved around two major themes: Delayed Possession Claims and Refund and Settlement Agreements.
In the case summarized, the complainant raised concerns regarding the potential delay in the completion and handover of their apartment, seeking a refund of the booking amount due to these alleged delays. The builder, however, responded by stating that the matter was settled amicably with a refund, indicating the lack of necessity for further legal proceedings. This reflects a common scenario where buyers, anxious about their investments, file disputes possibly driven by anxiety over timelines rather than a failure on the part of the builder.
Examining the case, it is evident that grievances were primarily centered on claims of delayed possession, with buyers often fearing that their investments would not …
Individual case details available for subscribers.
Builder Reviews
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!
Submit Your Review
Interested in buying from SHRIPROP DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED?
Leave your details – our team will call you back within 5 minutes.