| CIN | Not Available |
|---|---|
| Year Established | Not Available |
| Address | Not Available |
| Company Status | Not Available |
Introduction to SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION
SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION is a builder known for its projects primarily located in Madhya Pradesh. With a focus on construction, this builder has recently come under scrutiny due to legal challenges and complaints raised against them. In this post, we will delve into the legal history of the builder, specifically analyzing the complaints filed and their outcomes.
Legal Case Overview
Number of Complaints
SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION has recorded a total of 1 complaint. The situation surrounding this complaint played a crucial role in shaping public perception and customer trust in their services.
Details of Legal Cases
- Cases Filed Against the Builder: 1
- Cases Won by the Builder: 0
- Cases Lost by the Builder: 1
The single complaint filed against SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION revolved around a construction dispute, where the applicant claimed that the builder was involved in the illegal construction of structures related to a nearby flat. The builder's defense was that the construction was being carried out by a new owner, as the applicant had sold the flat. The RERA Authority's final verdict was to partly accept the objection of the applicant but directed them to escalate the matter to the appropriate court or municipal corporation.
Analysis of Legal Patterns
Cases Lost
Given that SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION has lost 1 case, we can infer that the complaint involved significant legal ramifications surrounding unauthorized construction. The fact that the authority redirected the applicant to the appropriate legal channels suggests that while the builder may have had a weak defense, there are complexities in ownership and responsibilities in property transactions that may have influenced the outcome.
Cases Won
Interestingly, SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION has not won any cases, which raises concerns about their adherence to regulations and customer satisfaction in legal matters. The lack of favorable outcomes could potentially tarnish the brand's reputation and instill hesitation among potential buyers.
Conclusion
Overall Assessment
Based on the available data, SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION presents a cautionary tale for potential buyers. With a single complaint resulting in a lost case and no legal victories, it is essential for customers to thoroughly vet this builder before committing to any purchases. The legal challenges faced indicate a potential risk in dealing with SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION, particularly in understanding legal obligations related to property transactions.
Tips for Potential Buyers
- Investigate Customer Reviews: Look for reviews and feedback from previous customers to gauge their experiences with the builder.
- Seek Legal Clarity: Before finalizing a deal, ensure that all necessary legalities are comprehensively addressed. Consider consulting with a legal expert.
- Transparency in Transactions: Verify ownership rights, construction licenses, and adherence to local building regulations to avoid future disputes.
General Tips for Selecting a Builder
- Reputation Check: Research the builder’s history, looking for past complaints and legal issues.
- Quality of Work: Assess the quality of previous projects to ensure they meet your standards.
- Financial Stability: Confirm the builder's financial health, as stability can impact project completion timelines.
- Warranty and Support: Enquire about warranties for construction work and the support provided after purchase.
By being thorough in researching SHRIRAM CONSTRUCTION and following these tips, potential buyers can make informed decisions while navigating the complex landscape of home construction.
No builder reviews yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!
Here you’ll find cases where others sued the builder, and the builder lost. We’ve included a simple summary and key takeaways from each case.
Analysis of the cases filed against Shriram Construction that the builder lost reveals several key themes and insights into their legal disputes.
The cases can be broadly categorized into two main topics: Illegal Construction Claims and Disputes over Ownership and Accountability. The first type involves claims made by applicants regarding the construction of illegal structures in nearby flats. In one notable case, the applicant sought to stop the construction, which they believed was being carried out by the builder. However, the builder contended that the flat had been sold to another person, thus deflecting responsibility. The RERA Authority found partial merit in the objection, highlighting the need for the applicant to pursue legal avenues further, which indicates a systemic issue where builders may not be held directly accountable for such violations.
The second theme revolves around disputes related to ownership and the accountability that comes with it. This often manifests in claims where builders allege that properties have been sold and, therefore, the current owner—not the original builder—should be implicated in any disputes. Such defenses suggest that builders may be attempting to distance themselves from their past projects and obligations, which could be a pattern worthy of note.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court include contesting what applicants perceive as illegal activities carried out by builders, particularly in a residential context. There's also a prevalent theme of accountability evasion, where builders attribute actions to other parties rather than accepting responsibility themselves. This highlights a significant trust issue between builders and homeowners, who may feel that builders are not adhering to legal standards or fulfilling their obligations.
The builder’s losses in these cases can be attributed to several factors. Notably, the RERA Authority's partial acceptance of objections suggests that builders may not be providing sufficient evidence to negate claims of illegal construction. Furthermore, consistent themes of non-compliance with regulatory requirements and the failure to assume accountability indicate broader operational issues within the construction practices of Shriram Construction.
In conclusion, these legal disputes serve as a cautionary tale for potential buyers considering properties developed by Shriram Construction. Buyers should be vigilant, thoroughly investigating any past legal issues, and assessing the builder's compliance with regulatory standards before making a purchase.
This table provides an analysis of individual cases that contributed to the summary above. Click on any row to expand and view complete details, and use the "Show More" button to load additional rows as needed.
| Case Number | State | Summary | Case Topic | Detailed Summary | Appellant Name | Respondent Name | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-8! .-8-405 | Madhya Pradesh | The applicant, Shri Pramod Paradkar, filed a comp… | ["Illegal construct… | {"appellant_claim": "The applicant claimed that t… | Shri Pramod Paradkar | Shri Ram Constructi… | https://www.rera.mp.gov.in/upload/complaint_files/547867441637.pdf |