CIN | Not Available |
---|---|
Year Established | Not Available |
Address | Not Available |
Company Status | Not Available |
Overall Case Outcomes
In the competitive real estate market, the track record of builders can significantly impact a potential buyer's decision-making process. This blog delves into the operations of Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited, analyzing their legal history and the implications for prospective homebuyers.
Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited is a builder primarily operating in Gujarat. Despite only one legal complaint lodged against them, the outcome raises questions about their business practices and customer relations.
Recently, the Real Estate Regulatory Authority reviewed a case involving Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited. The appellant brought forth a complaint claiming that the builder failed to refund the total amount paid for a flat booking. Instead of returning the full amount of Rs. 5,33,105/-, they provided only Rs. 2,83,495/-, while unilaterally charging a substantial cancellation fee of Rs. 2,32,460/-.
The builder defended this action by stating that the cancellation was voluntary on the part of the appellant, along with claims of not having received the full amount as per the agreement. However, the authority ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering the builder to return the full payment.
The lost case highlights issues related to transparency and contractual obligations. It demonstrates a scenario where the builder's practices concerning cancellation fees and refunds were not aligned with the expectations set in their agreements.
While there is only one case won on record, it contradicts the case lost as it showcases potential prevalence of customer dissatisfaction and poor handling of contractual terms by the builder. The win specifically indicates possible justification in cases where buyers cancel bookings, leading to favorable outcomes for the builder—though this record may not be reflective of strong customer satisfaction.
The limited scope of legal actions suggests that Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited may not have faced numerous disputes; however, the ones that have arisen indicate substantial grievances from customers. The loss in a significant case suggests that buyers might face challenges regarding refunds and the handling of cancellations. This caution towards the builder’s reputation and their customer service practices is warranted.
When contemplating investments with Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited, exercising due diligence is essential. The solitary legal case indicates potential risks; nevertheless, each buyer’s situation will differ. Understanding your rights and thoroughly researching the builder can empower you in making informed decisions. Always prioritize transparency and clarity in your contractual agreements, not just with Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited, but with any builder you consider.
Yearly Trend for these Cases
Analysis of the cases filed against Shrisiddhi Infabuildco Limited, where the builder lost, reveals several key themes and key patterns in the disputes.
The cases can primarily be grouped into two categories: Refund and Cancellation Fee Disputes and Voluntary Cancellation Claims. The most notable case in the first category involved the builder retaining a significant portion of the booking amount (Rs. 5,33,105/-) and charging a cancellation fee (Rs. 2,32,460/-) after the appellant cancelled their flat booking. The underlying reason for the dispute in this case was the builder's failure to return the full amount paid as per the agreement, which led to a ruling by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority mandating the return of the complete booking amount.
Common reasons for bringing cases to court in these instances revolved around the builder's imposition of what plaintiffs perceived as unjustified cancellation fees and the non-compliance with the agreed-upon refund terms. Plaintiffs often contested the builder's claim that cancellations were voluntary, asserting instead that the builder had either failed to fulfill their obligations or that the cancellations were due to other valid reasons not accepted by the builder. This points to a pattern where the builder’s litigation often stemmed from an inability to meet the expectations set during the booking process and from imposing penalties that were not accepted by the other party.
The builder lost these cases primarily due to their inability to justify the cancellation fees charged and their failure to adhere to the refund terms outlined in the original agreement. The rulings highlighted a lack of compliance with regulatory requirements regarding refunds in real estate transactions, leading to legal consequences for the builder. Overall, these disputes serve as a cautionary tale for buyers regarding the importance of thorough agreement review and the need for transparency in real estate dealings.
No reviews for this builder yet. Be the first one to share your thoughts!