SHRISTI INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED

Introduction

Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited has been active in the real estate sector of India, predominantly operating in the states of Assam and West Bengal. However, the company’s track record in legal disputes raises questions about its reliability and commitment to customer satisfaction. In this blog post, we will delve into the builder's legal battles, evaluating the outcomes of cases filed against them and their own legal endeavors.

Overview of Legal Cases

The builder has faced a total of 6 complaints, winning 1 case and losing 5. This, on the surface, paints a concerning picture about their customer service and project management. Let's analyze the details of these cases to identify any discernible patterns.

Cases Won by the Builder

1. Outcome Overview: The sole case that the builder won involved a dispute over the registration of a project. The builder appealed to a tribunal after their project registration was …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

Analysis of the cases filed against Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around three common topics: delayed possession claims, failure to refund, and entitlement disputes.

Many of the complaints made by the homeowners revolved around the builder's failure to deliver apartments despite multiple payments being made. This points to a significant issue with transparency and adherence to timelines in the builder's operations. The repeated failures to provide possession on schedule created a series of cases all classified under the theme of delayed possession claims.

Closely tied to the issue of delayed possession was the complaint of failure to refund amounts paid by the homeowners. In several instances, the builder was unable to return the funds invested by buyers, which further aggravated the grievances and led to legal actions. The builder's defense often revolved around their claim that …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around Project Registration Disputes and Regulatory Compliance Issues.

In the specific case examined, the builder sought to register a project that was ready for registration, contesting the respondent's claim that pending cases before the High Court prevented such registration. This highlights a common theme wherein builders often feel hindered by external legal challenges that they believe unjustly delay their project timelines.

The cases indicate that the builder frequently brought litigation to contest delays or restrictions placed by regulatory bodies or other parties. A pattern emerges where the builder disputes penalties or claims related to non-compliance as a measure to protect their interests. These disputes often arise when there are misunderstandings about the legal or operational status of a project, indicating a complex interplay between builders …

Unlock Full Report & Analysis