Analysis of the cases filed against Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, where the builder lost, revealed several key themes and patterns. The cases primarily revolved around three common topics: delayed possession claims, failure to refund, and entitlement disputes.

Many of the complaints made by the homeowners revolved around the builder's failure to deliver apartments despite multiple payments being made. This points to a significant issue with transparency and adherence to timelines in the builder's operations. The repeated failures to provide possession on schedule created a series of cases all classified under the theme of delayed possession claims.

Closely tied to the issue of delayed possession was the complaint of failure to refund amounts paid by the homeowners. In several instances, the builder was unable to return the funds invested by buyers, which further aggravated the grievances and led to legal actions. The builder's defense often revolved around their claim that buyers were not entitled to refunds or possession, yet the legal verdicts consistently favored the homeowners, indicating a fundamental misunderstanding of contractual obligations by the builder.

The entitlement disputes stemmed from the builder's position that buyers were not entitled to either the promised apartments or their money back. However, the West Bengal Real Estate Regulatory Authority ruled against the builder in multiple cases, mandating refunds along with interest. This trend shows that the builder's claims of non-entitlement were not only rejected by the homeowners but also by the governing regulatory body, highlighting a significant legal and ethical failure on the builder's part.

The common reasons for the builder's losses in these cases include a lack of adherence to their contractual obligations, failure to provide timely refunds or possession, and an inability to fulfill the expectations set during the purchase agreements. The builder's repeated claims of entitlement disputes indicate a systemic issue where they may have either misinterpreted legal standards or willfully disregarded them, leading to numerous legal setbacks.

Overall, this analysis underscores the importance for potential buyers to exercise caution when engaging with Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited. It is crucial to scrutinize contract terms, maintain transparency, and be aware of legal rights in dealings with this builder, given their evident history of legal disputes and losses.

An analysis of the cases filed by the builder, Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited, which it won, revealed the following information. The disputes primarily revolved around Project Registration Disputes and Regulatory Compliance Issues.

In the specific case examined, the builder sought to register a project that was ready for registration, contesting the respondent's claim that pending cases before the High Court prevented such registration. This highlights a common theme wherein builders often feel hindered by external legal challenges that they believe unjustly delay their project timelines.

The cases indicate that the builder frequently brought litigation to contest delays or restrictions placed by regulatory bodies or other parties. A pattern emerges where the builder disputes penalties or claims related to non-compliance as a measure to protect their interests. These disputes often arise when there are misunderstandings about the legal or operational status of a project, indicating a complex interplay between builders and regulatory entities.

The outcomes of these cases in favor of the builder often stem from the insufficiency of evidence provided by the respondent or failure on their part to comply with legal directives. The verdicts suggest that misunderstandings regarding land classification, project registration, or ongoing legal matters can lead to disputes, which the builder has successfully navigated.

This analysis conveys a broader message about the reputation of Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited in the real estate market. It implies that while disputes may arise, buyers should be cautious in their accusations, as legitimate builders may face unwarranted challenges. This situation reflects a reality where builders can effectively defend themselves against false or exaggerated claims, which ultimately protects their business integrity.

For potential buyers, this underscores the importance of making informed decisions in the real estate market. While legitimate disputes do occur, the successful defense of builders like Shristi Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited shows that many claims may not hold water under scrutiny. Buyers are urged to approach claims carefully and seek reliable information before forming opinions about a builder's reputation and reliability.