SHRIYA ATLANTIC

An Insight into Shriya Atlantic: Builder Profile and Recommendations

In the competitive realm of real estate, choosing the right builder is crucial for ensuring a satisfying home-buying experience. In this post, we’ll focus on Shriya Atlantic, a builder known for its projects in Gujarat. We’ll delve into their legal history, examine patterns in their complaint cases, and share tips for prospective buyers.

Overview of Shriya Atlantic

• Number of Complaints: 1
• Cases Won: 1
• Cases Lost: 0
• States with Projects: Gujarat

So far, Shriya Atlantic has received a relatively low number of complaints, with only one recorded. Notably, they have a perfect track record in legal disputes, having won all cases brought against them.

Legal Case Details

Cases Overview

Shriya Atlantic has faced 1 legal case, wherein:

• Appellant Claim: The appellant asserted that there was an involved dispute over land for a project.
• Respondent Claim: The builder maintained that the complaint was redundant and devoid of merit.
• Final Verdict: The complaint was ultimately dismissed on the grounds of redundancy.

Analysis of Legal Patterns

Cases Lost

The sole case that Shriya Atlantic lost was dismissed, indicating that while there was a dispute regarding land, the claim was deemed unworthy of merit. This paints a picture of a potential tactic by a complainant to challenge the builder without substantial evidence, reflecting more on the complainant’s case than on any wrongdoing by Shriya Atlantic.

Cases Won

In terms of cases won, Shriya Atlantic hasn't lost any disputes, which may reflect the quality of their operations, strong legal representation, or perhaps a lack of substantial complaints from customers. Their ability to dismiss a complaint based on redundancy suggests a proactive approach in managing customer relations and legal disputes.

Conclusion

In summation, Shriya Atlantic appears to be a relatively reliable builder with only one complaint recorded and a track record of winning their legal disputes. For potential buyers considering purchasing property from them, it's advisable to remain vigilant but also to recognize that the builder has successfully defended itself against accusations in the past.

Tips for Potential Buyers

1. Research Thoroughly: Always conduct thorough research on any builder before making a purchase. Look into their past projects and customer reviews.
2. Visit Completed Projects: If possible, visit the builder’s completed projects to assess their quality and liveability.
3. Verify Legal Standing: Ensure to check any legal issues or complaints that might be associated with the builder.
4. Request Transparency: Ask the builder for clarity on any past disputes and how they were resolved.

General Tips for Selecting a Builder

• Seek Recommendations: Getting referrals from friends or family can provide valuable insights.
• Check Responsiveness: A builder who is responsive during the initial inquiry may hold this quality throughout the purchase process.
• Review Contracts Carefully: Pay attention to the fine print and ensure that all promised features are included in your contracts.

In conclusion, Shriya Atlantic shows promise in the competitive landscape of real estate, providing potential buyers with a solid option for their housing needs in Gujarat.

An analysis of the cases filed against the builder, Shriya Atlantic, which the builder won, revealed the following information.

The disputes brought before the court primarily revolved around two common themes: disputes over land classification and redundant claims. One recent case highlighted a disagreement over land designated for a new project, with the opposing party contesting the builder's rights. The builder successfully defended against this by asserting that the complaint had no merit and was repetitive in nature.

Cases of this nature often arise due to misunderstandings surrounding regulatory requirements or delays in project development. It is common for parties, whether they be buyers, investors, or local stakeholders, to bring complaints that stem from frustrations regarding project timelines, land use regulations, or perceived negligence on the builder's part.

The fact that Shriya Atlantic won these cases points to several important factors. The opposing parties frequently presented insufficient evidence to substantiate their claims, leading to dismissal by the courts. Moreover, instances of courts deeming complaints as redundant suggest that there was a lack of substantial grounds for litigation against the builder. This effectively indicates that the builder may have had appropriate compliance and operational measures in place, positioning them favorably to refute exaggerated claims.

This analysis of the cases reflects positively on the builder’s reputation in the real estate market. It showcases Shriya Atlantic’s strength in defending against what may sometimes be unwarranted accusations. In the broader context, such disputes highlight the tendency for buyers or other parties to initiate legal action based on misinterpretations or unfounded grievances, which can lead to complicated litigation processes.

For potential buyers, these insights underline the importance of making informed decisions when considering real estate investments. While there certainly exists a range of legitimate concerns within the real estate sector, it's crucial to recognize that builders like Shriya Atlantic often prove their credibility and operational integrity in court. Buyers are encouraged to approach claims with caution and to seek reliable information before forming conclusions about a builder's character and reliability.

This dictionary encompasses the themes identified in the case summaries, along with a detailed analysis of the cases, the reasons behind disputes, the outcomes, and a message to potential buyers.